Statement of Principles concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease No. 84 of 2011

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2011L01441 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 84 of 2011

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 34 of 2006, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that retinal vascular occlusive disease and death from retinal vascular occlusive disease can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 84 of 2011 concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, retinal vascular occlusive disease or death from retinal vascular occlusive disease is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 November 2008 concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

 

  • revising factor 6(h) concerning 'being obese';
  • extending factor 6(l) concerning 'retinal vein occlusion only', to include 'angle-closure glaucoma', 'being dehydrated' and 'paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria';
  • deleting factor 6(m) concerning 'being dehydrated' as it is now covered by factor 6(l);
  • renumbering factor 6(n) as 6(m) concerning 'retinal arterial occlusion only', and extending the factor to include 'giant cell arteritis, polyarteritis nodosa or Takayasu's arteritis' and 'ipsilateral carotid arterial disease';
  • new factor 6(n) concerning 'combined oral contraceptive pill';
  • new factor 6(o) concerning 'a haematological disorder';
  • new factor 6(p) concerning 'vasculitis';
  • new factor 6(q) concerning 'microscopic polyangiitis';
  • new factor 6(r) concerning 'thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease)';
  • new factor 6(s) concerning 'systemic lupus erythematosus';
  • new factor 6(t) concerning 'a disease from the specified list';
  • new factor 6(u) concerning 'migraine';
  • new factor 6(v) concerning 'ocular or orbital infection';
  • new factor 6(w) concerning 'a lesion of the tissues within the orbit, of the optic nerve, or within the eye';
  • new factor 6(x) concerning 'an ipsilateral neoplasm';
  • new factor 6(y) concerning 'a vascular abnormality';
  • new definitions of 'a disease from the specified list', 'a haematological disorder from the specified list of haematological disorders that are associated with a hypercoagulable state', 'ocular or orbital infection' and 'paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'a drug from the specified list', 'a potential source of embolus to the eye' and 'ICD-10-AM code'  in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to retinal vascular occlusive disease in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 November 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to retinal vascular occlusive disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 November 2008.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 84 of 2011, under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, addresses the issue of retinal vascular occlusive disease (RVOD) and its potential link to particular kinds of military service. This instrument was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) and replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 34 of 2006 concerning RVOD. The Authority determined this new instrument based on available medical-scientific evidence, establishing a Statement of Principles to assist in assessing claims for compensation under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This legislative instrument outlines the factors that must exist and be related to specific types of military service for RVOD or death from RVOD to be considered connected to service circumstances. The Authority’s determination follows an investigation notified in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 November 2008, where it examined the sound medical-scientific evidence, leading to several modifications in the Statement of Principles, including the addition of new factors and revisions to definitions.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 84 of 2011 under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) pertains to retinal vascular occlusive disease and its connection to particular kinds of military service. This Instrument replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 34 of 2006 and sets out the Statement of Principles that must be met for a claim to be accepted under both the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The Act applies to veterans who served in eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service as defined by the respective acts. The scope extends to claims for compensation related to injuries, diseases, or deaths occurring on or after 1 July 2004. The Instrument delineates the specific factors, including new and revised medical conditions, that need to be present and related to military service for a claim to be substantiated on the balance of probabilities. This revision reflects an extensive review of the medical-scientific evidence available and aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the connection between retinal vascular occlusive disease and military service.

Key Provisions

The key provision of this Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument is the determination of a Statement of Principles concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease (subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA)). This Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to certain kinds of service, before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, retinal vascular occlusive disease or death from retinal vascular occlusive disease is connected with the circumstances of that service (paragraph 4). This Statement of Principles effectively replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 34 of 2006 (paragraph 2). The Authority has revised the Statement of Principles to incorporate new medical-scientific evidence, including new factors such as combined oral contraceptive pill use, haematological disorders, vasculitis, and others (paragraph 6). The obligations imposed by this Act primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority, which must determine Statements of Principles that outline the circumstances under which particular medical conditions can be related to service. The Authority is responsible for ensuring that these Statements of Principles are based on sound medical-scientific evidence and that they reflect the most current understanding of the relevant medical conditions (paragraph 2). Additionally, the Authority must advertise its intention to investigate a particular condition and invite submissions from relevant organisations and individuals (paragraph 8). For claimants, the obligation is to provide evidence that their condition meets the criteria set out in the relevant Statement of Principles in order to be eligible for compensation under the VEA or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) (paragraph 3). The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach within its text. However, breaches of related provisions in the VEA or MRCA, such as providing false or misleading information in a claim for compensation, could result in criminal or civil penalties. Under section 265 of the VEA, a person who knowingly or recklessly makes a false or misleading statement in a claim for compensation can be fined up to 5,000 penalty units or imprisoned for up to five years, or both. Additionally, under section 327 of the MRCA, a person who is found to have made a false statement in relation to a claim for compensation may be liable for civil penalties, including the payment of costs and damages.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.