Statement of Principles concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease No. 83 of 2011

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2011L01440 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 83 of 2011

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 33 of 2006, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that retinal vascular occlusive disease and death from retinal vascular occlusive disease can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 83 of 2011 concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting retinal vascular occlusive disease or death from retinal vascular occlusive disease, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 November 2008 concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

 

  • revising factor 6(h) concerning 'being obese';
  • extending factor 6(l) concerning 'retinal vein occlusion only', to include 'angle-closure glaucoma', 'being dehydrated' and 'paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria';
  • deleting factor 6(m) concerning' being dehydrated' as it is now covered by factor 6(l);
  • renumbering factor 6(n) as 6(m) concerning 'retinal arterial occlusion only', and extending the factor to include 'giant cell arteritis, polyarteritis nodosa or Takayasu's arteritis' and 'ipsilateral carotid arterial disease';
  • new factor 6(n) concerning 'combined oral contraceptive pill';
  • new factor 6(o) concerning 'a haematological disorder';
  • new factor 6(p) concerning 'vasculitis';
  • new factor 6(q) concerning 'microscopic polyangiitis';
  • new factor 6(r) concerning 'thromboangiitis obliterans (Buerger's disease)';
  • new factor 6(s) concerning 'systemic lupus erythematosus';
  • new factor 6(t) concerning 'a disease from the specified list';
  • new factor 6(u) concerning 'migraine';
  • new factor 6(v) concerning 'ocular or orbital infection';
  • new factor 6(w) concerning 'a lesion of the tissues within the orbit, of the optic nerve, or within the eye';
  • new factor 6(x) concerning 'an ipsilateral neoplasm';
  • new factor 6(y) concerning 'a vascular abnormality';
  • new factor 6(z) concerning 'an acute hypotensive episode';
  • new factor 6(aa) concerning 'prolonged external pressure to the eyeball';
  • new definitions of 'a disease from the specified list', 'a haematological disorder from the specified list of haematological disorders that are associated with a hypercoagulable state', 'an acute hypotensive episode', 'ocular or orbital infection', 'paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria' and 'prolonged external pressure to the eyeball' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'a drug from the specified list', 'a potential source of embolus to the eye' and 'ICD-10-AM code'  in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to retinal vascular occlusive disease in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 November 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to retinal vascular occlusive disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 November 2008.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 83 of 2011, published under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, addresses the medical condition of retinal vascular occlusive disease. This legislative instrument was enacted to provide updated guidance on the connection between retinal vascular occlusive disease and specific military service, following a comprehensive review of medical-scientific evidence. The Repatriation Medical Authority, acting under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, revoked the previous Instrument No. 33 of 2006 and introduced this new instrument to reflect the latest understanding of the condition. The objective is to ensure that claims for compensation related to retinal vascular occlusive disease are assessed in line with the most current medical evidence, thereby providing fair and accurate compensation to affected veterans.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 83 of 2011 under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 outlines the Statement of Principles concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease, replacing the previously revoked Instrument No. 33 of 2006. This legislation applies to individuals who have served in various capacities, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service, and aims to determine the eligibility of veterans for compensation related to retinal vascular occlusive disease or death from such conditions. The Statement of Principles specifies the medical and service-related factors that must exist to establish a connection between the disease and the service rendered, thereby facilitating the assessment of compensation claims. The Instrument affects those who have sustained or contracted service injuries or diseases on or after 1 July 2004, as the determination of such claims is governed by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. The legislation's scope is national, as it applies across Australia, and it is administered by the Repatriation Medical Authority, which has the authority to determine Statements of Principles under the VEA. The Instrument includes several amendments and additions to factors and definitions related to retinal vascular occlusive disease, clarifying the criteria for compensation claims.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislation concern the revocation and replacement of a previous Instrument concerning retinal vascular occlusive disease (subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, or VEA). Specifically, Instrument No. 33 of 2006 is revoked and replaced with Instrument No. 83 of 2011, which contains a new Statement of Principles. This new Statement of Principles outlines the conditions that must be met to establish a connection between retinal vascular occlusive disease and various types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, and hazardous service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (or MRCA). The obligations imposed by this Act primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority, which must determine whether a reasonable hypothesis exists that links retinal vascular occlusive disease or death from this disease to specific types of service. The Authority must base its determination on sound medical-scientific evidence, and it must follow a process that includes advertising its intention to investigate in the Government Notices Gazette, inviting submissions from relevant parties, and considering any submissions received. The Statement of Principles must be determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA, as clarified by this Instrument. There are no explicit offences, penalties, or consequences for breach mentioned in the text. However, it is implied that failure to comply with the process or requirements outlined in the VEA and the MRCA could lead to legal challenges or disputes regarding the validity of claims for compensation related to retinal vascular occlusive disease. The maximum penalties for any offences related to the administration of these Acts would be determined by the relevant legislation and would not necessarily be specified in this explanatory statement.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Prohibited Conduct
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.