Statement of Principles concerning renal stone disease No. 66 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L02305 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 66 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) revokes:

(i)            Instrument No. 179 of 1995 determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning nephrolithiasis and death from nephrolithiasis; and

(ii)         Instrument No. 181 of 1995 determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning ureteric calculus and death from ureteric calculus.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that renal stone disease and death from renal stone disease can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 66 of 2010 concerning renal stone disease.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, renal stone disease or death from renal stone disease is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new Instrument results from investigations notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007 concerning nephrolithiasis and ureteric calculus in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigations involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • changing the name of the Instrument to 'renal stone disease';
  • new definition of 'renal stone disease' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(j) concerning 'chronic urinary tract infection with urease-producing bacteria for magnesium ammonium phosphate stones only';
  • revising factor 6(k) concerning 'acquired narrowing or acquired obstruction of the affected ureter or the affected renal calyx';
  • revising factor 6(o) concerning 'ileal resection or ileal bypass surgery';
  • revising factor 6(t) concerning 'being treated with a drug or a drug from a class of drugs';
  • revising factor 6(u) concerning 'urinary diversion procedure';
  • new factor 6(a) concerning 'primary hyperparathyroidism';
  • new factor 6(b) concerning 'hyperthyroidism';
  • new factor 6(c) concerning 'a malignant neoplasm';
  • new factor 6(d) concerning 'gout';
  • new factor 6(e) concerning 'a myeloproliferative disorder';
  • new factor 6(f) concerning 'haemolytic anaemia';
  • new factor 6(g) concerning 'chemotherapy-induced tumour lysis';
  • new factor 6(h) concerning 'diarrhoea';
  • new factor 6(i) concerning 'hypokalaemia';
  • new factor 6(l) concerning 'inflammatory bowel disease';
  • new factor 6(m) concerning 'chronic pancreatitis';
  • new factor 6(n) concerning 'biliary cirrhosis';
  • new factor 6(p) concerning 'Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery';
  • new factor 6(q) concerning 'type 2 diabetes mellitus';
  • new factor 6(r) concerning 'sarcoidosis';
  • new factor 6(s) concerning 'Sjogren’s syndrome';
  • new factor 6(v) concerning 'neurogenic bladder dysfunction';
  • new factor 6(w) concerning 'paraplegia or quadriplegia';
  • new factor 6(x) concerning 'being bed-bound';
  • new factor 6(y) concerning 'being obese';
  • new factor 6(z) concerning 'a heat-stressed, dehydrating environment and  inadequate fluid intake';
  • new factor 6(aa) concerning 'renal transplantation';
  • new factor 6(bb) concerning 'spaceflight';
  • deleting onset factors concerning 'hypercalcaemia', 'Type 1 renal tubular acidosis', 'cystinuria', 'caliceal diverticulum', 'retrocaval ureter', 'horseshoe kidney', 'nephrolithiasis' and 'polycystic kidney disease';
  • previous factors concerning 'hypercalciuria', 'hyperoxaluria', 'hyperuricaemia' and 'hyperuricosuria' are now redundant as they are covered by new factors contained within the Instrument;
  • new definitions of 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from the specified list', 'bed-bound', 'being obese', 'death from renal stone disease', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'inadequate fluid intake', 'relevant service', 'terminal event' and 'urease-producing bacteria' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'caliceal diverticulum', 'cystinuria', 'horseshoe kidney', 'hypercalcaemia', 'hypercalciuria', 'hyperoxaluria', 'hyperuricaemia', 'hyperuricosuria', 'ICD code', 'ileal resection', 'nephrolithiasis', 'other drugs known to play a role in calculogenesis in the urinary tract', 'polycystic kidney disease', 'retrocaval ureter', 'Type 1 renal tubular acidosis', 'ureteral obstruction', 'ureteric calculus', 'ureteropelvic junction obstruction' and 'urinary tract infection involving the bacterial enzyme urease'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake investigations in relation to nephrolithiasis and ureteric calculus in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007, and circulated a copy of the notices of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  Two submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigations.

 

9.             On 3 June 2010, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to hypercalcaemia, Type 1 renal tubular acidosis, cystinuria, caliceal diverticulum, retrocaval ureter, horseshoe kidney, polycystic kidney disease and nephrolithiasis. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

10.         The determining of this new Instrument finalises the investigations in relation to nephrolithiasis and ureteric calculus as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007.

 


11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 66 of 2010, under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), revokes previous instruments concerning nephrolithiasis and ureteric calculus and replaces them with a new Statement of Principles concerning renal stone disease. The Authority's determination is based on updated medical-scientific evidence indicating a probable link between renal stone disease and specific service circumstances. This new Instrument serves to formalise the connection between renal stone disease and particular kinds of service, including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service, as defined by the VEA and MRCA. The Authority sought and considered submissions during its investigations and has now finalised the new Statement of Principles, clarifying the criteria for acceptance of liability for service-related renal stone disease. The new Instrument incorporates revised definitions, factors, and other changes to reflect current medical understanding and legislative requirements.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 66 of 2010, concerning renal stone disease, applies to veterans and service personnel under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislation outlines the circumstances under which renal stone disease and death from renal stone disease can be related to particular kinds of service, including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service. The Instrument replaces the previously revoked Statements of Principles concerning nephrolithiasis and ureteric calculus, providing updated medical-scientific evidence and revised factors for determining the connection between renal stone disease and service. The new Instrument was determined following investigations and submissions received by the Authority. The Instrument's scope extends to the Commonwealth of Australia and is applicable to all veterans and service personnel who meet the specified criteria for renal stone disease related to their service. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds in this Instrument, and its application is not extended or restricted through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) has revoked two previous instruments: Instrument No. 179 of 1995 concerning nephrolithiasis and death from nephrolithiasis, and Instrument No. 181 of 1995 concerning ureteric calculus and death from ureteric calculus. This revocation is based on the Authority’s assessment that, with the available medical-scientific evidence, it is more probable than not that renal stone disease and death from renal stone disease can be related to certain types of service. To address this, the Authority has issued a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 66 of 2010, concerning renal stone disease, which supersedes the revoked instruments. The new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 66 of 2010, outlines the conditions under which renal stone disease or death from renal stone disease can be considered connected to eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service. For such a connection to be established, specific factors must exist and be related to the service rendered by the individual. The instrument details these factors, including conditions such as primary hyperparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism, malignant neoplasm, gout, and various other medical conditions and treatments that can contribute to renal stone disease. The instrument also incorporates new definitions and deletes previous factors that are now considered redundant or insufficiently supported by medical-scientific evidence. The Authority's obligations include determining the Statement of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence and ensuring that the instrument reflects the latest format and definitions. The process involved advertising the intention to undertake investigations in the Government Notices Gazette, inviting submissions from relevant organisations and individuals, and considering any received submissions. The Authority also provided an opportunity for organisations to make representations on the proposed instrument before its final determination. The new instrument clarifies that it applies for both the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), which governs claims for compensation commencing on 1 July 2004. Failure to comply with the provisions of the VEA and the MRCA can lead to civil or criminal consequences. For instance, providing false or misleading information in claims for compensation may result in penalties under the MRCA. The exact penalties are not specified in the explanatory notes but typically include fines and potential legal action. Additionally, the Authority can revoke or amend the Statement of Principles if new evidence or circumstances warrant such action, ensuring that the criteria for compensation remain aligned with the latest medical-scientific understanding.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.