Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 107 of 2022)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2022L01381 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 107 OF 2022)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 107 of 2022).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 107 of 2022).

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that portal vein thrombosis and death from portal vein thrombosis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined this Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting portal vein thrombosis or death from portal vein thrombosis, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             The Repatriation Commission, Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, Veterans' Review Board or Administrative Appeals Tribunal cannot accept any claim for pension; or a claim for liability or compensation relating to portal vein thrombosis or death from portal vein thrombosis that was lodged on or after 1 June 1994 in the case of the VEA, or 1 July 2004 in the case of the MRCA respectively, unless this Statement of Principles upholds that claim (subsection 120A(3) of the VEA or subsection 338(3) of the MRCA).

7.             This new Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 October 2021 concerning portal vein thrombosis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence available to the Authority.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to portal vein thrombosis in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 October 2021, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  Two submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this new Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to portal vein thrombosis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 October 2021.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 107 of 2022

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Portal vein thrombosis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have portal vein thrombosis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal; and
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting portal vein thrombosis with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement.

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 107 of 2022) was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This legislative instrument aims to address the gap in the recognition of portal vein thrombosis as a condition potentially related to certain types of military service, thereby ensuring that eligible veterans and service personnel can claim medical treatment and compensation for this condition. The Authority determined this statement of principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence linking portal vein thrombosis to specific kinds of service. The instrument outlines the minimum factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to connect portal vein thrombosis with service, facilitating claims and assessments under the respective Acts and ensuring compliance with human rights standards. The Statement of Principles sets out the essential factors that must be related to particular kinds of military service, including operational, hazardous, peacekeeping, and British nuclear test defence service, before it can be concluded that portal vein thrombosis or death from this condition is reasonably connected to service. This legislative instrument aids in the assessment and review of claims for pension, liability, or compensation related to portal vein thrombosis, ensuring that such claims lodged after the specified dates are assessed in accordance with this new instrument. The Repatriation Medical Authority conducted an investigation, inviting submissions from relevant stakeholders, to determine these principles, finalising the investigation as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 107 of 2022) applies to veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependants who are seeking compensation or benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Statement of Principles outlines the minimum medical-scientific factors that must be present for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting portal vein thrombosis or death from portal vein thrombosis to specific kinds of service. These include operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence services under the VEA, and warlike and non-warlike services under the MRCA. This legislative instrument is applicable nationally in Australia and aims to ensure that claims for compensation or benefits related to portal vein thrombosis are assessed based on sound medical-scientific evidence. The determination of this Statement of Principles ensures that any claim for pension, or a claim for liability or compensation relating to portal vein thrombosis or death from portal vein thrombosis lodged on or after 1 June 1994 under the VEA, or 1 July 2004 under the MRCA, can only be accepted if upheld by this Statement of Principles. The legislation does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but rather relies on the soundness of the medical-scientific evidence connecting the service to the condition. The application and interpretation of this Statement of Principles may be further elaborated through subordinate instruments, which would provide more detailed guidelines and criteria for assessing claims.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 107 of 2022) (the Instrument) sets out the circumstances in which portal vein thrombosis and death from portal vein thrombosis can be related to particular kinds of military service, as determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) (section 2). This is to facilitate claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) (section 4). The Instrument outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting portal vein thrombosis with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person (section 5). The Instrument applies to claims lodged on or after 1 June 1994 in the case of the VEA, or 1 July 2004 in the case of the MRCA (section 6). The Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to portal vein thrombosis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 12 October 2021 (section 10). The Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (section 9). The Instrument does not derogate from any human rights and promotes a number of human rights (section 4). The Statement of Principles imposes obligations on the parties it governs, including the Repatriation Medical Authority, the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The Repatriation Medical Authority must determine the Statement of Principles concerning portal vein thrombosis based on sound medical-scientific evidence, as outlined in subsection 196B(2) of the VEA. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must assess claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, based on the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are responsible for reviewing decisions made by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, respectively. There are no offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach of the Statement of Principles. However, claims for pension, or claims for liability or compensation relating to portal vein thrombosis or death from portal vein thrombosis that were lodged on or after 1 June 1994 in the case of the VEA, or 1 July 2004 in the case of the MRCA respectively, cannot be accepted unless the Statement of Principles upholds that claim (subsection 120A(3) of the VEA or subsection 338(3) of the MRCA). The Statement of Principles provides guidance on the circumstances in which portal vein thrombosis and death from portal vein thrombosis can be related to particular kinds of military service, and the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the condition with the service. Any claim that does not meet the criteria outlined in the Statement of Principles will not be accepted for assessment or review.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Health Law
Instrument
Explanatory Statement
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.