Statement of Principles concerning porphyria cutanea tarda (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 69 of 2021)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2021L00615 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

PORPHYRIA CUTANEA TARDA

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 69 OF 2021)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning porphyria cutanea tarda (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 69 of 2021).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 43 of 2012 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2012L01357) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning porphyria cutanea tarda.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that porphyria cutanea tarda and death from porphyria cutanea tarda can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning porphyria cutanea tarda (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 69 of 2021).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting porphyria cutanea tarda or death from porphyria cutanea tarda, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 October 2019 concerning porphyria cutanea tarda in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'porphyria cutanea tarda' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(1) and 9(13) concerning consuming alcohol, for males;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(2) and 9(14) concerning consuming alcohol, for females;
  • new factors in subsections 9(3) and 9(15) concerning having alcohol use disorder;
  • new factors in subsections 9(4) and 9(16) concerning having cirrhosis of the liver or steatohepatitis;
  • new factors in subsections 9(5) and 9(17) concerning having chronic renal failure;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(6) and 9(18) concerning having hepatic iron overload, by the inclusion of a note;
  • new factors in subsections 9(7) and 9(19) concerning having a viral infection from the specified list of viral infections;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(8) and 9(20) concerning taking a drug from the specified list of drugs;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(9) and 9(21) concerning taking a drug;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(10) and 9(22) concerning inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a chemical agent contaminated by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin (TCDD);
  • new factors in subsections 9(11) and 9(23) concerning ingesting food contaminated with hexachlorobenzene;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(12) and 9(24) concerning having smoked tobacco products;
  • deleting the factors concerning having a liver disease from the specified list, as these are now covered by the factors in:
  • subsections 9(4) and 9(16) concerning having cirrhosis of the liver or steatohepatitis; and
  • subsections 9(7) and 9(19) concerning having a viral infection from the specified list of viral infections;
  • deleting the factors concerning undergoing haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, as these are now covered by the factors in subsections 9(5) and 9(17) concerning having chronic renal failure;
  • deleting the factors concerning being infected with human immunodeficiency virus, as these are now covered by the factors in subsections 9(7) and 9(19) concerning having a viral infection from the specified list of viral infections;
  • deleting the factors concerning taking a course of oral oestrogen therapy, as these are now covered by the factors in subsections 9(8) and 9(20) concerning taking a drug from the specified list of drugs;
  • deleting the factors concerning having exposure to a halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon as specified, as these are now partially covered by the factors in subsections 9(11) and 9(23) concerning ingesting food contaminated with hexachlorobenzene;
  • deleting the factors concerning having the affected area of skin exposed to sunlight or ultraviolet light;
  • deleting the factors concerning having a porphyrin-generating hepatocellular tumour;
  • new definitions of 'chronic renal failure', 'inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a chemical gent contaminated by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin (TCDD)', 'MRCA', 'specified list of drugs', 'specified list of viral infections' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'cigarettes per day or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products', 'iron overload' and 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from the specified list', 'a halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon from the specified list', 'alcohol', 'a liver disease from the specified list', 'a specified chemical agent', 'having exposure as specified to a chemical agent contaminated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin (TCDD)', 'having exposure to a halogenated aromatic hydrocarbon' and 'porphyrin-generating hepatocellular tumour'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to porphyria cutanea tarda in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 October 2019, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 3 March 2021, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to having a porphyrin-generating hepatocellular tumour at the time of the clinical onset of porphyria cutanea tarda, having the affected area of skin exposed to sunlight or ultraviolet light within the five days before the clinical onset of porphyria cutanea tarda, having a porphyrin-generating hepatocellular tumour at the time of the clinical worsening of porphyria cutanea tarda and having the affected area of skin exposed to sunlight or ultraviolet light within the five days before the clinical worsening of porphyria cutanea tarda.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  Minor changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to porphyria cutanea tarda as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 October 2019.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority’s website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 69 of 2021

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Porphyria cutanea tarda

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have porphyria cutanea tarda;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting porphyria cutanea tarda with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 43 of 2012; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning porphyria cutanea tarda which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning porphyria cutanea tarda (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 69 of 2021) was enacted to provide clarity and guidance on the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting porphyria cutanea tarda with service rendered by a person, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Statement of Principles replaces the previous Instrument No. 43 of 2012 and incorporates updates based on the latest sound medical-scientific evidence. The purpose of the Statement of Principles is to facilitate claims under the relevant Acts by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have porphyria cutanea tarda. The Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must be present and related to specified kinds of service before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting the condition with the service. The Repatriation Medical Authority, which is the enacting body, determined this Statement of Principles in accordance with subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. The policy objective of this legislative instrument is to ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, and to facilitate the assessment and determination of social security benefits, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and Defence Force members.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning porphyria cutanea tarda (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 69 of 2021) applies to eligible veterans and current or former members of the Defence Force who may be suffering from porphyria cutanea tarda, a condition that has been reasonably hypothesised to be connected to specific kinds of service. This Statement of Principles is applicable under both the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, thus encompassing operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the former, and warlike and non-warlike service under the latter. It aims to provide clarity and assistance in the assessment and determination of claims related to this condition. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, as it pertains to veterans and Defence Force members throughout Australia. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the Statement of Principles itself, although the availability of benefits under the VEA and MRCA may be subject to certain eligibility criteria and conditions. The determination of this Statement of Principles finalises an investigation concerning porphyria cutanea tarda, and while the Act itself does not extend or restrict application through subordinate instruments, the Repatriation Medical Authority may develop further guidelines or policies to assist in its implementation.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning porphyria cutanea tarda (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 69 of 2021) under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) sets out the minimum factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to connect porphyria cutanea tarda, or death from porphyria cutanea tarda, with the service rendered by a person (section 9). These factors must be related to specific types of service such as operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service (section 5). The factors include, but are not limited to, consumption of alcohol, alcohol use disorder, liver conditions, chronic renal failure, viral infections, drug intake, exposure to certain chemical agents, and ingestion of contaminated food (section 9). The parties governed by this Act, primarily the Repatriation Medical Authority, are obligated to apply these principles in determining claims under the VEA and MRCA. Claimants must present evidence that satisfies the outlined factors to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting their porphyria cutanea tarda to their service (section 5). The Repatriation Commission and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must assess these claims based on the sound medical-scientific evidence provided and the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles. Breach of the provisions set out in this legislation could lead to a variety of consequences. However, the Explanatory Statement does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance. Given the nature of the legislation, any failure to adhere to these principles in the determination and assessment of claims could potentially lead to disputes and appeals, with the outcomes being reviewed by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The determination of penalties or consequences for non-compliance would likely be governed by the broader provisions of the VEA and MRCA.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Licensing & Registration
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.