Statement of Principles concerning plantar fasciitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 82 of 2023)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2023L01134 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

PLANTAR FASCIITIS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 82 OF 2023)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning plantar fasciitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 82 of 2023).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 51 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L00257) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning plantar fasciitis.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that plantar fasciitis and death from plantar fasciitis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning plantar fasciitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 82 of 2023).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting plantar fasciitis or death from plantar fasciitis, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022 concerning plantar fasciitis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'plantar fasciitis' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning having trauma;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning running or jogging;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning undertaking exercise;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning increasing the frequency, duration or intensity of weight bearing activity;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning being overweight or obese;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(10) concerning wearing footwear with inadequate cushioning;
  • revising the definitions of 'systemic arthritic disease' and 'other crystal-induced arthropathy' in Schedule 1  Dictionary.
  • new definitions of 'being overweight or obese', 'BMI', 'clinical onset', 'MRCA', and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'being obese', 'hard surface' and 'inappropriate footwear'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to plantar fasciitis in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to plantar fasciitis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 82 of 2023

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Plantar fasciitis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have plantar fasciitis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting plantar fasciitis with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 51 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning plantar fasciitis which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning plantar fasciitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 82 of 2023) was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, to address the sound medical-scientific evidence indicating a link between plantar fasciitis and certain types of military service. This legislative instrument replaces Instrument No. 51 of 2015, reflecting advancements in medical-scientific evidence since its inception. It aims to facilitate claims for medical treatment and compensation for veterans and current or former Defence Force members suffering from plantar fasciitis, by delineating the minimum conditions that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting the condition with the service rendered. The Statement of Principles applies to both the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting human rights such as the right to social security and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Authority's determination of this Statement of Principles follows an investigation initiated in May 2022, which involved an examination of the latest available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning plantar fasciitis. The Statement of Principles outlines the factors necessary for connecting plantar fasciitis with service, including trauma, running or jogging, and inadequate footwear, among others. It is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from any rights and promotes the rights of veterans, Defence Force members, and their dependents, ensuring that these rights are exercised without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning plantar fasciitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 82 of 2023) applies to veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents who may be eligible for benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Act outlines the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to specific types of service, before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting plantar fasciitis or death from plantar fasciitis with the circumstances of that service. The Act covers operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. The instrument is applicable across Australia, as it is determined under the Commonwealth legislation. The determination of this instrument is complemented by various definitions and revisions concerning plantar fasciitis, trauma, exercise, weight-bearing activities, and other related factors. It is noteworthy that this instrument replaces Instrument No. 51 of 2015, reflecting the latest medical-scientific evidence available. The application of the Act extends through subordinate instruments, which facilitate the assessment and determination of social security benefits, compensation, and treatment related to plantar fasciitis. These instruments are designed to ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, and that they do not derogate from any human rights. Instead, they promote various human rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, and the rights of persons with disabilities, without discrimination of any kind. The Act is compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning plantar fasciitis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 82 of 2023) (the Instrument) outlines the specific factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting plantar fasciitis to particular types of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), and warlike and non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Instrument is intended to guide the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in their assessments of claims, as well as to facilitate reviews by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The Instrument specifies that certain factors, such as trauma, running or jogging, exercise, increased weight-bearing activity, being overweight or obese, and wearing footwear with inadequate cushioning, must be related to the service in question to establish a link to plantar fasciitis. The Instrument imposes obligations on the parties it governs, namely the Repatriation Medical Authority, the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, the Veterans' Review Board, and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The Repatriation Medical Authority is responsible for determining the Statement of Principles and ensuring its compatibility with human rights. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must use the Statement of Principles in their assessments of claims, while the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are tasked with reviewing decisions made under the VEA and the MRCA respectively. Breaches of the obligations set out in the Instrument may lead to civil or criminal consequences. The specific consequences for breach are not detailed in the Explanatory Statement, but given the nature of the legislation, it is likely that non-compliance could result in legal action, penalties, or other administrative measures. The maximum penalties for offences under the VEA and the MRCA may vary depending on the specific breach and the jurisdiction in which it occurs. It is important for all parties to adhere to the requirements of the Instrument to avoid potential legal repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.