Statement of Principles concerning photocontact dermatitis (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 83 of 2020)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2020L01384 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

PHOTOCONTACT DERMATITIS

(BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES) (NO. 83 OF 2020)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning photocontact dermatitis (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 83 of 2020).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 109 of 2011 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2011L01744) determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning photocontact dermatitis.

3.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that photocontact dermatitis and death from photocontact dermatitis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning photocontact dermatitis (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 83 of 2020).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service and British nuclear test defence service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, photocontact dermatitis or death from photocontact dermatitis is connected with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 November 2018 concerning photocontact dermatitis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'photocontact dermatitis' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(1) and 9(3) concerning having the affected area of skin exposed to light in the presence of a phototoxic agent;
  • revising the factors in subsections 9(2) and 9(4) concerning having the affected area of skin exposed to light in the presence of a photoallergen;
  • deleting the factor concerning having cutaneous exposure to the photoallergen responsible for the photocontact dermatitis and to light, for allergic photocontact dermatitis only and for clinical onset only, as this has been subsumed into the factors in subsections 9(2) and 9(4) concerning having the affected area of skin exposed to light in the presence of a photoallergen;
  • new definitions of 'light', 'MRCA' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • revising the definitions of 'photoallergen', 'phototoxic agent' and 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to photocontact dermatitis in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 November 2018, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to photocontact dermatitis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 November 2018.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority’s website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

  Email:    info@rma.gov.au

  Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 83 of 2020

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Photocontact dermatitis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have photocontact dermatitis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, photocontact dermatitis is connected with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 109 of 2011; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning photocontact dermatitis which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning photocontact dermatitis (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 83 of 2020) was enacted in 2020 to address the problem of establishing a connection between photocontact dermatitis and specific service types, thereby facilitating claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA, aiming to ensure that the assessment of claims is based on sound medical-scientific evidence. The policy objective is to provide clarity and transparency in the criteria required to link photocontact dermatitis to eligible service, thus supporting the rights of veterans and service personnel to social security, adequate living standards, and the highest attainable standard of health. This instrument replaces the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 109 of 2011 and incorporates the latest available medical-scientific evidence. It specifies the factors that must exist and be related to certain types of service, such as eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service, for photocontact dermatitis or death from it to be connected with the circumstances of that service. The Repatriation Medical Authority undertook an investigation and consultation process, advertising the investigation in the Government Notices Gazette and inviting submissions from relevant stakeholders, although none were received. The instrument is compatible with human rights as it promotes the rights of veterans and service personnel without derogating from any human rights.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning photocontact dermatitis (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 83 of 2020) applies to individuals who are making or have made claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) for conditions related to photocontact dermatitis. This legislation governs the circumstances under which such claims may be assessed and approved, particularly in relation to the connection between photocontact dermatitis and specific types of military service, including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service. The scope of this Act is national, as it is applicable across Australia, and is overseen by the Repatriation Medical Authority. The principles set out in this Instrument replace the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 109 of 2011, reflecting the most current medical-scientific evidence. This Act does not specify any exclusions or thresholds but is subject to the overarching human rights standards as outlined in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, ensuring compatibility with the rights recognised in international instruments. The application of this Act can be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments or regulations as necessary.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning photocontact dermatitis (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 83 of 2020) (the Instrument) sets out the circumstances under which photocontact dermatitis can be considered connected with eligible service. This Instrument, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), is intended to assist in the assessment and determination of claims for medical treatment and compensation by clarifying the factors that must exist before a connection can be made on the balance of probabilities. The Instrument specifies the service circumstances and factors related to photocontact dermatitis that must be considered in claims under the VEA and MRCA. The Instrument imposes obligations on claimants and the authorities responsible for assessing claims, including the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. Claimants must provide evidence that aligns with the factors outlined in the Instrument to support their claim for medical treatment and compensation. The authorities are required to assess claims based on the factors specified in the Instrument and the sound medical-scientific evidence available. The Instrument also facilitates the review of decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal by providing a clear framework for assessing claims. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined in the Instrument for non-compliance with its provisions. However, the failure to provide adequate evidence or misrepresent facts in a claim could potentially lead to the rejection of a claim, which may have implications for the claimant's entitlement to benefits. Additionally, the authorities have the discretion to refer cases of suspected fraud or misrepresentation to law enforcement agencies, which could result in criminal charges and penalties under other legislation. The Instrument reflects the latest medical-scientific evidence and is designed to ensure that claimants receive fair and consistent assessments. It promotes the human rights of veterans and Defence Force members by facilitating access to social security, adequate living standards, and healthcare services. The Instrument also ensures that claims are assessed without discrimination, thereby promoting equality and non-discrimination in the provision of benefits.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.