Statement of Principles concerning peripheral neuropathy No. 41 of 2005

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2005L04128 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES NO. 41 of 2005

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (‘the Authority’), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (‘the VEA’) revokes Instrument No. 79 of 2001 of 12 September 2001 and Instrument No. 13 of 2003 of 7 April 2003, each of which was determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning peripheral neuropathy.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that peripheral neuropathy and death from peripheral neuropathy can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined, pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA, Statement of Principles concerning peripheral neuropathy No. 41 of 2005. This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             Pursuant to the provisions of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (‘the MRCA’), claims for pension under the VEA or compensation under the MRCA are determined by the Repatriation Commission or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting peripheral neuropathy or death from peripheral neuropathy, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from the investigation concerning peripheral neuropathy, notified in the Government Notices Gazettes of 20 August 2003 and 14 July 2004 by the Authority, in accordance with section 196G of the VEA. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The title and format of this new Instrument has been varied, including a new titling clause 1, headnote to clause 2 and the renumbering of subsequent clauses. These changes have been introduced in order to assist users in locating the appropriate Instrument when searching the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

7.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments. Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • changing the definition of ‘peripheral neuropathy’ in clause 3;
  • a new factor 6(b) relating to alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse;
  • a new factor 6(g) relating to having an inflammatory connective tissue disease;
  • rewording factor 6(h) relating to having an infection, stipulating that that infection can be viral, bacterial or protozoal;
  • rewording factor 6(i) relating to electrical or thermal burns so that the factor applies to all types of peripheral neuropathy meeting the definition in clause 3;
  • deleting the factors applying to brachial plexopathy and lumbosacral plexopathy (no longer coming within the definition in clause 3);
  • deleting the factors applying to Guillain-Barre syndrome (no longer coming within the definition in clause 3);
  • rewording factor 6(j) relating to a critical illness requiring mechanical ventilation support so that the factor applies to all types of peripheral neuropathy meeting the definition in clause 3;
  • rewording factor 6(k) relating to inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a chemical agent so that the factor applies to all types of peripheral neuropathy meeting the definition in clause 3;
  • a new factor 6(l) relating to inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a volatile substance;
  • a new factor 6(m) relating to inhalant abuse or inhalant dependence;
  • a new factor 6(n) relating to inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a chemical agent contaminated by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-dioxin (TCDD);
  • a new factor 6(o) relating to inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with methyl bromide;
  • a new factor 6(p) relating to having an episode of acute cholinergic poisoning from exposure to an organophosphorus ester or a carbamate pesticide;
  • rewording factor 6(q) relating to being poisoned with an organic toxin;
  • rewording factor 6(r) relating to being poisoned with a specified metal;
  • rewording factors 6(t) and (u) relating to being treated with a drug so that the factors apply to all types of peripheral neuropathy meeting the definition in clause 3;
  • rewording factors 6(v) relating to being treated with cisplatin so that the factor applies to all types of peripheral neuropathy meeting the definition in clause 3;
  • deleting the factor relating to nonfreezing cold injury;
  • deleting the definitions in clause 9 of ‘a course of therapeutic radiation’, ‘a haematological or lymphoproliferative disorder from the specified list’, ‘a systemic disease from the specified list’, ‘a systemic vasculitis from the specified list’, ‘alcohol (contained within alcoholic drinks)’, ‘an infection from the specified list’, ‘frostbite’, ‘heavy metal poisoning’, ‘ICD-10-AM code’, ‘mixed sensory motor polyneuropathy’, ‘mononeuritis multiplex’, ‘motor polyneuropathy’, ‘nonfreezing cold injury’, ‘one of the chemical agents in the specified list’, ‘one of the drugs from List1’, ‘one of the drugs from list 2’, ‘one of the metals specified in the list’, ‘one of the pesticides specified in the list’, ‘organophosphorus pesticide poisoning’, ‘plexopathy’, ‘polyneuropathy’, ‘sensory polyneuropathy’ and ‘suffering from a nutritional deficiency from the specified list’;
  • revising the definition of ‘relevant service’ in clause 9;
  • including new definitions in clause 9 of ‘a critical illness’, a drug from Specified List 1’, ‘a drug from Specified List 2’, ‘a haematological or lymphoproliferative disorder’, ‘a nutritional deficiency’, ‘a specified chemical’, ‘a specified metal’, ‘a systemic disease’, ‘a systemic vasculitis’, ‘a viral, bacterial or protozoal infection’, ‘a volatile substance’, ‘acute cholinergic poisoning’, ‘alcohol’, ‘an inflammatory connective tissue disease’, ‘an organic toxin’, ‘an organophosphorus ester’, ‘inhalant abuse or inhalant dependence’ and ‘inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a chemical agent contaminated by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-dioxin (TCDD)’; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

8.             Further changes to the format and wording of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

9.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to peripheral neuropathy in the Government Notices Gazettes of 20 August 2003, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.

 

10.         Following the commencement of the MRCA, the Authority published a “Further Notice of Investigations” in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 July 2004, extending the closing date for submissions in relation to the above mentioned investigation until 10 September 2004. The Authority again invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA (who include persons eligible to make a claim under the MRCA), as well as the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and any person having expertise in the field.

 

11.         Two submissions were received and considered by the Authority during the investigation.

 

12.         On 15 August 2005, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed instrument, the medical-scientific evidence considered by the Authority and drawing attention to the varied definition of peripheral neuropathy and the non-inclusion of factors relating to plexopathy or Guillain-Barre syndrome in the proposed new instrument. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No representations were received.

 

13.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to peripheral neuropathy which was advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 20 August 2003 and 14 July 2004.

 

14.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Statement of Principles No. 41 of 2005, enacted under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, addresses the problem of establishing a link between peripheral neuropathy and certain kinds of service rendered by veterans and service personnel. The enactment by the Repatriation Medical Authority seeks to rectify the gap in existing statements of principles concerning peripheral neuropathy, replacing previous instruments to provide a more comprehensive and updated framework for assessing claims related to peripheral neuropathy. The policy objective is to ensure that claims for pensions or compensation are adjudicated based on sound medical-scientific evidence, considering the relationship between peripheral neuropathy and specific service types. This legislative update aims to provide clarity and consistency in the evaluation of such claims, thereby supporting affected veterans and service personnel more effectively.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Statement of Principles No. 41 of 2005, issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, pertains to peripheral neuropathy and its connection to certain types of military service. This instrument applies to individuals who have served in operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, or non-warlike services and who may be claiming pension or compensation related to peripheral neuropathy. It serves to outline the factors that must exist to establish a connection between the condition and the service rendered, such as the presence of specific diseases, exposure to chemical agents, or certain types of infections. The new instrument replaces previous statements concerning peripheral neuropathy and introduces updated definitions and factors, reflecting the latest medical-scientific evidence. The Authority's determination process involved extensive consultation and consideration of submissions, ensuring the instrument is comprehensive and accurate. The instrument's application is national in scope, affecting veterans and service personnel across Australia, and its provisions are enforced by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) has issued Statement of Principles No. 41 of 2005 concerning peripheral neuropathy, which revokes previous instruments issued in 2001 and 2003 (section 2). This new statement outlines the medical-scientific evidence linking peripheral neuropathy to certain types of military service and specifies the factors necessary for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised that peripheral neuropathy or death from peripheral neuropathy is related to these service circumstances (section 4). The key provisions of this Statement of Principles (section 4) require the existence of specific factors related to operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service, among other things, to establish a link between the condition and the service rendered (section 4). The new statement incorporates several modifications, including changes to the definition of 'peripheral neuropathy', the addition of new factors such as alcohol dependence or abuse, inflammatory connective tissue disease, and exposure to various chemical agents, and the deletion of factors related to plexopathy and Guillain-Barre syndrome (section 6). The obligations imposed by this Statement of Principles (section 4) include ensuring that all claims for pension under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) or compensation under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) are determined by the Repatriation Commission or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in accordance with the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles (section 3). This means that the existence of the specified factors related to the service must be established as a minimum to support a claim. There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences outlined in the Statement of Principles itself. However, breaches of the provisions of the VEA or the MRCA in the context of these claims could result in legal consequences, such as fines or imprisonment for providing false or misleading information, under sections 127 and 127A of the VEA and sections 16 and 17 of the MRCA, respectively. The maximum penalties for these offences include fines of up to $66,000 or imprisonment for up to five years under the VEA and fines of up to $55,000 or imprisonment for up to two years under the MRCA. These penalties apply to any individual or entity that knowingly or recklessly provides false or misleading information in the context of a claim.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.