Statement of Principles concerning periodontitis No. 48 of 2013

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2013L01122 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 48 of 2013

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 2 of 2002, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning periodontitis.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that periodontitis and death from periodontitis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 48 of 2013 concerning periodontitis.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service and British nuclear test defence service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, periodontitis or death from periodontitis is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 June 2010 concerning periodontitis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'periodontitis' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(n) concerning 'gingivitis';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(o) concerning 'smoking';
  • revising factors 6(c) & 6(p) concerning 'diabetes mellitus';
  • revising factors 6(d) & 6(q) concerning 'a nutritional deficiency';
  • revising factors 6(e) & 6(r) concerning 'human immunodeficiency virus';
  • revising factor 6(f) concerning 'osseointegrated implant or dental prosthesis', for clinical onset only;
  • revising factors 6(g) & 6(t) concerning 'trauma';
  • new factors 6(h) & 6(u) concerning 'an oral piercing';
  • new factors 6(i) & 6(v) concerning 'chronic renal disease';
  • new factors 6(j) & 6(w) concerning 'neutropaenia, agranulocytosis or leukaemia';
  • new factors 6(k) & 6(x) concerning 'being obese';
  • new factors 6(l) & 6(y) concerning 'alcohol';
  • new factors 6(m) & 6(z) concerning 'rheumatoid arthritis';
  • deleting factors concerning 'dental pulp disease' as these factors are now included in new Statements of Principles concerning 'periodontal abscess';
  • revising factor 6(s) concerning 'a foreign body', for clinical worsening only;
  • new definitions of 'a foreign body', 'a nutritional deficiency', 'an oral piercing', 'alcohol', 'being obese', 'pack-years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products' and 'trauma to the affected region of the periodontium' in clause 9;
  • revising the definitions of 'ICD-10-AM code' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting the definitions of 'cigarettes per day or the equivalent thereof, in other tobacco products', 'periodontal abscess' and 'suffering from a severe nutritional deficiency'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to periodontitis in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 June 2010, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

 

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to periodontitis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 June 2010.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 48 of 2013

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Periodontitis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have periodontitis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, periodontitis is connected with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 4 of the Explanatory Notes;
  • replaces Instrument No. 2 of 2002; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning periodontitis which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; and
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 48 of 2013 was enacted to address the problem of establishing a clear connection between periodontitis and specific kinds of service under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This legislation was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority in response to a need to provide more precise and medically-grounded criteria for linking periodontitis with service, thereby ensuring that veterans and Defence Force members receive appropriate medical treatment and compensation. The primary policy objective of this instrument is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims for periodontitis by specifying the circumstances under which such claims can be supported by sound medical-scientific evidence. This legislative instrument aims to replace the previously revoked Instrument No. 2 of 2002 with updated criteria that reflect the latest medical understanding of periodontitis, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, and that they promote the human rights of veterans and their dependents.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 48 of 2013, which pertains to periodontitis under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, applies to eligible veterans, current and former members of the Defence Force, and their dependents who may have contracted periodontitis as a result of their service. This instrument outlines the specific service-related factors that must exist for periodontitis or death from periodontitis to be considered connected to the service rendered. It applies to various kinds of service including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service. The instrument has a national reach within Australia, as it pertains to federal legislation. The Authority has revoked the previous Statement of Principles (Instrument No. 2 of 2002) and replaced it with this new instrument, which reflects updated medical-scientific evidence. There are no specific exclusions mentioned in the document, but the instrument is designed to ensure that only those meeting the specified criteria will be eligible for compensation or medical treatment. The Authority may extend or restrict the application of this instrument through subordinate instruments as needed.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 48 of 2013 (the Instrument) is a legislative instrument issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It replaces Instrument No. 2 of 2002 concerning periodontitis and outlines the factors necessary to determine a connection between periodontitis and certain kinds of service. The Instrument establishes a Statement of Principles which identifies the factors that must exist to conclude that periodontitis or death from periodontitis is connected with eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service (sections 4 and 6). The Authority is required to determine such Statements of Principles under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA. These Statements of Principles assist claimants in making claims and the Repatriation Commission in assessing those claims under the VEA and the MRCA (section 2). They also facilitate the review of decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The Instrument imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Claimants must provide evidence that satisfies the factors set out in the Statement of Principles to establish a connection between periodontitis and their service. The Repatriation Commission must assess claims based on the factors outlined in the Instrument. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal must review decisions made by the Repatriation Commission in accordance with the criteria specified in the Instrument. The Authority is required to ensure that the Instrument is compatible with human rights and to provide a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights (section 9). Breaches of the requirements set out in the Instrument may have legal consequences. While the Instrument itself does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for non-compliance, it is integral to the broader legislative framework under the VEA and the MRCA. Non-compliance with the provisions of the VEA or the MRCA, including failing to provide necessary evidence or making false claims, may result in civil or criminal penalties. Under the VEA, penalties for fraud or misrepresentation can include fines and imprisonment. Under the MRCA, penalties for making false or misleading statements can also include fines and imprisonment. The exact penalties depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as outlined in the respective Acts.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.