Statement of Principles concerning Paget disease of bone (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 62 of 2023)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2023L00892 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

PAGET DISEASE OF BONE

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 62 OF 2023)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning Paget disease of bone (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 62 of 2023).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 49 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L00255) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning Paget disease of bone.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that Paget disease of bone and death from Paget disease of bone can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning Paget disease of bone (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 62 of 2023).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting Paget disease of bone or death from Paget disease of bone, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022 concerning Paget disease of bone in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'Paget disease of bone' in subsection 7(2);
  • including ICD-10-AM codes for 'Paget disease of bone' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning inability to obtain appropriate clinical management of Paget disease of bone before the clinical worsening of Paget disease of bone.

 

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to Paget disease of bone in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to Paget disease of bone as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 62 of 2023

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Paget disease of bone

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have Paget disease of bone;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting Paget disease of bone with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 49 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning Paget disease of bone which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Paget disease of bone (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 62 of 2023) was introduced to address the need for a comprehensive and up-to-date set of criteria to determine the eligibility of veterans for benefits related to Paget disease of bone under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). Enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under the authority granted by the VEA, the Statement of Principles aims to ensure that the qualifying conditions for benefits are based on sound medical-scientific evidence and are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. This legislative instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles No. 49 of 2015, incorporating the latest evidence and adopting a revised format for consistency. The policy objective is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims by clarifying the factors that must exist to raise a reasonable hypothesis connecting Paget disease of bone to particular kinds of service rendered by veterans. The Statement of Principles sets out the minimum factors that must exist and be related to specific types of service, such as operational service or warlike service, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting Paget disease of bone with the circumstances of that service. By doing so, it aims to promote human rights such as the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Authority has determined that this instrument is compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from any rights and promotes the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Paget disease of bone (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 62 of 2023) applies to veterans and current or former Defence Force members who have Paget disease of bone and are seeking medical treatment and compensation under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislation outlines the factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting Paget disease of bone with particular kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service, as well as warlike and non-warlike service. The instrument has been determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA and replaces Instrument No. 49 of 2020, reflecting the latest available sound medical-scientific evidence. The Instrument is designed to facilitate claims and assessments by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, as well as reviews by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, promoting rights such as the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning Paget disease of bone (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 62 of 2023) primarily sets out the circumstances under which Paget disease of bone or death from this condition can be reasonably hypothesised to be related to specific kinds of service rendered by a person. These kinds of service include operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). These provisions are detailed in sections 5 and 6 of the Statement of Principles. The Statement of Principles imposes obligations on parties such as the Repatriation Medical Authority, the Repatriation Commission, and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. It requires these entities to consider the principles when assessing claims for medical treatment and compensation related to Paget disease of bone. Claimants are also required to provide evidence that connects their condition to their service in accordance with the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles. Additionally, the Authority must ensure that the determination of the Statement of Principles is based on sound medical-scientific evidence, as mandated by subsection 196B(2) of the VEA. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Statement of Principles may result in civil consequences for claimants, such as the denial of claims for medical treatment and compensation if the required connections to service cannot be substantiated. The Statement of Principles does not explicitly detail criminal penalties, but breaches of the associated Acts (VEA and MRCA) can result in penalties, including fines and imprisonment, as stipulated in sections 282 and 283 of the VEA and sections 311 and 312 of the MRCA. Additionally, the Repatriation Medical Authority and the relevant Commissions may face administrative and judicial review if their decisions are found to be inconsistent with the Statement of Principles.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.