Statement of Principles concerning osteoporosis No. 98 of 2014

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2014L01388 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 98 of 2014

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 29 of 2006, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning osteoporosis.
  2. The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that osteoporosis and death from osteoporosis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 98 of 2014 concerning osteoporosis.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.
  3. The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.
  4. The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting osteoporosis or death from osteoporosis, with the circumstances of that service.

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 November 2011 concerning osteoporosis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

  • revising the definition of 'osteoporosis' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(f) & 6(ee) concerning 'a drug from the specified list';
  • revising factors 6(h) & 6(gg) concerning ' a specified autoimmune disorder';
  • new factors 6(i) & 6(hh) concerning 'a specified medical condition';
  • revising factors 6(j) & 6(ii) concerning 'myeloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma or systemic mastocytosis';
  • revising factors 6(k) & 6(jj) concerning 'solid organ, stem cell or bone marrow transplantation';
  • revising factors 6(l) & 6(kk) concerning 'a specified gastrointestinal disease';
  • new factors 6(n) & 6(mm) concerning 'depressive disorder or schizophrenia';
  • revising factors 6(o) & 6(nn) concerning 'being immobile';
  • revising factors 6(p) & 6(oo) concerning 'a BMI of less than 20';
  • new factors 6(q) & 6(pp) concerning 'losing ten percent or more of body weight';
  • revising factors 6(r) & 6(qq) concerning 'an inability to undertake physical activity';
  • revising factors 6(s) & 6(rr) concerning 'average daily calcium';
  • revising factors 6(t) & 6(ss) concerning 'vitamin D deficiency';
  • revising factors 6(v) & 6(uu) concerning 'severe vitamin C deficiency';
  • revising factors 6(w) & 6(vv) concerning 'cadmium';
  • new factors 6(y) & 6(xx) concerning 'being pregnant', for a minimal trauma fracture only;
  • new definitions of 'a minimal trauma fracture', 'a specified medical condition', 'being immobile', 'DSM-5' and 'severe vitamin C deficiency' in clause 9;
  • revising the definitions of 'a drug from the specified list', 'a specified autoimmune disorder', 'a specified endocrine abnormality', 'anorexia nervosa', 'chronic renal failure', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'pack-years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products', 'relevant service' and 'systemic mastocytosis' in clause 9;
  • deleting the definitions of 'a severe vitamin C deficiency' and 'acquired vitamin D deficiency'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

7.             This Instrument incorporates by reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association, 2013.  A copy of this document is available from the offices of the Repatriation Medical Authority, Level 8, Bank of Queensland Building, 259 Queen St, Brisbane Queensland 4000, by contacting the Registrar on telephone (07) 3815 9404.

8.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

9.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to osteoporosis in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 November 2011, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to osteoporosis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 November 2011.

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 98 of 2014

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Osteoporosis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have osteoporosis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting osteoporosis with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 4 of the Explanatory Notes;
  • replaces Instrument No. 29 of 2006; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning osteoporosis which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; and
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 98 of 2014, which was enacted under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, was introduced to address the issue of osteoporosis related to military service. The instrument, determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority, replaces the previous Instrument No. 29 of 2006 and revises the medical-scientific evidence concerning osteoporosis. The purpose of this instrument is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims by eligible individuals who have osteoporosis due to their service, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and their dependents. The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 98 of 2014 was determined in accordance with subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, aiming to improve the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the Act and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It outlines the factors that must exist to connect osteoporosis with the circumstances of eligible service and incorporates the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, promoting the rights to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 98 of 2014, concerning osteoporosis, is determined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Instrument applies to veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and other persons such as their dependents, who are seeking compensation or medical treatment related to osteoporosis. The scope of this Act is to establish a Statement of Principles that outlines the minimum factors that must exist to connect osteoporosis with certain kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service. This Instrument replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 29 of 2006 and incorporates revisions based on the latest sound medical-scientific evidence. It applies nationally across Australia, and its provisions are compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised in international instruments. The Authority may extend or restrict the application of this Instrument through subordinate instruments, but such actions are not elaborated upon in the provided text.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 98 of 2014, concerning osteoporosis, are found in clauses 3 to 6 and clause 9. Clause 3 provides a revised definition of 'osteoporosis', while clauses 4 to 6 detail the factors that must exist, and must be related to specific kinds of service, before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting osteoporosis or death from osteoporosis with the circumstances of that service. Clause 9 includes new and revised definitions relevant to the determination of osteoporosis claims. This Instrument replaces the revoked Instrument No. 29 of 2006 and incorporates by reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The Repatriation Medical Authority imposes obligations on the parties and entities it governs by setting out the minimum factors required for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised concerning the connection between osteoporosis and specific kinds of service. The Instrument also requires that claims for compensation be determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in accordance with the Statements of Principles issued by the Authority. The Authority is responsible for assessing the sound medical-scientific evidence available and ensuring that the criteria for determining eligibility for benefits are transparent, proportionate, and reasonable. The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 98 of 2014 does not explicitly state any specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach. However, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 and the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, which the Instrument governs, do include provisions for penalties and consequences for breaches of their respective requirements. Under these Acts, penalties for fraud or misrepresentation in claims can include fines, imprisonment, or both. The maximum penalties can vary depending on the nature and severity of the offence, as well as jurisdictional differences. It is important for parties to adhere to the requirements set out in these Acts to avoid potential legal repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.