Statement of Principles concerning obstructive and reflux nephropathy No. 31 of 2011

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2011L00767 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 31 of 2011

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 87 of 1996, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning obstructive nephropathy.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that obstructive and reflux nephropathy and death from obstructive and reflux nephropathy can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 31 of 2011 concerning obstructive and reflux nephropathy.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting obstructive and reflux nephropathy or death from obstructive and reflux nephropathy, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008 concerning obstructive nephropathy in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • changing the name of the Instrument to 'obstructive and reflux nephropathy';
  • new definition of 'obstructive and reflux nephropathy' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(f) concerning 'obstruction of the ureter or renal calyx';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(g) concerning 'obstruction of the bladder outlet or urethra';
  • new factors 6(c) & 6(h) concerning 'a renal or ureteric transplant';
  • new factors 6(d) & 6(i) concerning 'functional obstruction of the ureter or renal calyx';
  • new factors 6(e) & 6(j) concerning 'being treated with a drug from a class of drugs';
  • new definitions of 'a drug from a class of drugs in the specified list', 'death from obstructive and reflux nephropathy', 'functional obstruction of the ureter or renal calyx', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'obstruction of the bladder outlet or urethra', 'obstruction of the ureter or renal calyx' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • revising definition of 'relevant service'  in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'ICD code', 'obstruction of the bladder outlet', 'obstruction of the urethra' and 'obstruction of the renal pelvicalyceal system or ureter'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to obstructive nephropathy in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to obstructive nephropathy as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 31 of 2011, enacted in 2011, addresses the medical condition of obstructive and reflux nephropathy and death from these conditions among veterans and service personnel. This legislation was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority, under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, to provide a comprehensive Statement of Principles that replaces the previous revoked Instrument No. 87 of 1996. The Authority's determination is based on sound medical-scientific evidence linking these conditions to specific types of military service. The primary policy objective is to ensure that claims for compensation related to obstructive and reflux nephropathy, particularly those sustained or contracted on or after 1 July 2004, are assessed using the latest and most scientifically sound criteria. This instrument aims to streamline the process for veterans seeking compensation by clarifying the factors that must be established to support a claim, thereby facilitating more accurate and efficient assessments of their entitlements.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 31 of 2011, concerning obstructive and reflux nephropathy, applies to veterans and service personnel who have rendered specific types of service, namely operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, or non-warlike service, as defined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Instrument, which replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 87 of 1996, outlines the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting obstructive and reflux nephropathy or death from these conditions with the circumstances of their service. The Instrument determines the criteria for compensation claims for injuries or diseases related to service on or after 1 July 2004, with decisions made by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in accordance with the Statements of Principles issued by the Authority. The Instrument's application is national, and it extends its reach through the determination of specific service-related factors and medical conditions, clarifying the connection between these conditions and the service rendered. Any changes or further specifications to the Instrument are made through subordinate instruments as necessary.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA), under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), has revoked Instrument No. 87 of 1996 concerning obstructive nephropathy and replaced it with Instrument No. 31 of 2011, focusing on obstructive and reflux nephropathy (sections 2 and 3). This new instrument outlines the Statement of Principles for linking obstructive and reflux nephropathy, or death from these conditions, to specific types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service (section 4). The changes to this instrument reflect updated medical-scientific evidence and the adoption of a revised format, including new definitions and factors related to the condition (sections 5 and 6). Notably, the instrument now includes factors related to treatments and obstructions previously not covered, such as renal or ureteric transplants and functional obstructions (section 6). The obligations imposed by this Act primarily concern the provision of medical evidence and the determination of liability for service-related injuries or diseases. The RMA is tasked with evaluating medical-scientific evidence to establish a link between the specified service and the condition of obstructive and reflux nephropathy (section 7). The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must determine claims for compensation in accordance with the Statements of Principles issued by the RMA, especially for injuries or diseases sustained on or after 1 July 2004 (section 3). Claimants are required to provide evidence that meets the minimum factors set out in the Statement of Principles to substantiate their claims (section 4). Breaches of the provisions set out in the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) can lead to significant legal consequences. While the explanatory notes do not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties, general provisions within the VEA and MRCA address breaches. Under these Acts, unauthorised claims for compensation may be subject to scrutiny and potential penalties, including the recovery of wrongly paid compensation. Additionally, knowingly providing false or misleading information can result in criminal charges, with penalties including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offence and jurisdictional laws (sections 319 and 320 of the MRCA). The precise penalties would be determined in the context of the applicable criminal law provisions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.