Statement of Principles concerning Merkel cell carcinoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 80 of 2024)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2024L01331 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

MERKEL CELL CARCINOMA

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 80 OF 2024)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning Merkel cell carcinoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 80 of 2024).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 7 of 2016 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2016L00239) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning non-melanotic malignant neoplasm of the skin.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that Merkel cell carcinoma and death from Merkel cell carcinoma can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning Merkel cell carcinoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 80 of 2024).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting Merkel cell carcinoma or death from Merkel cell carcinoma, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023 concerning non-melanotic malignant neoplasm of the skin in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'Merkel cell carcinoma' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising ICD-10-AM codes for 'Merkel cell carcinoma' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning having sunlight exposure to unprotected skin;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning having PUVA therapy;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning being infected with human immunodeficiency virus;
  • revising factor in subsection 9(5) concerning undergoing solid organ (excluding corneal transplant) or bone marrow transplantation;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning having non-Hodgkin lymphoma;
  • new factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having mature B-cell lymphoid leukaemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma; and
  • new definition of 'latitude equivalent hours' in Schedule 1 – Dictionary; and
  • revising the definitions of 'PUVA therapy' and 'unprotected skin' in Schedule 1  Dictionary.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to non-melanotic malignant neoplasm of the skin in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

  1.              This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to non-melanotic malignant neoplasm of the skin as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023.

 

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 80 of 2024

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Merkel cell carcinoma

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have Merkel cell carcinoma;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting Merkel cell carcinoma with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 7 of 2016; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning Merkel cell carcinoma which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Merkel cell carcinoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 80 of 2024) was introduced to address the need for updated guidelines concerning Merkel cell carcinoma, a rare but serious form of skin cancer, and its connection to military service. This legislative instrument, enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, aims to ensure that veterans and current or former defence force members who have developed Merkel cell carcinoma can claim appropriate medical treatment and compensation. The Authority determined the Statement of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence indicating a link between Merkel cell carcinoma and specific types of military service. This updated instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles, reflecting advancements in medical-scientific understanding of the condition since its initial determination. The primary purpose of this legislative instrument is to facilitate the assessment of claims for compensation and medical treatment related to Merkel cell carcinoma under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It outlines the minimum factors that must be present and related to specific types of military service for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised that Merkel cell carcinoma was caused by or related to service. This updated Statement of Principles aims to promote the human rights of veterans and their dependents by ensuring that claims are processed in a reasonable, proportionate, and transparent manner, facilitating access to social security, adequate living standards, and health care services.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Merkel cell carcinoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 80 of 2024) applies to claims made under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) by veterans and current or former Defence Force members who have been diagnosed with Merkel cell carcinoma. The principles set forth in the document are designed to facilitate the determination of eligibility for compensation and medical treatment, by establishing the necessary criteria that must be met to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking Merkel cell carcinoma with particular types of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service. The application of this Statement of Principles is not restricted by geographic or jurisdictional boundaries within Australia, as it applies across Commonwealth and state/territory jurisdictions. The determination of this instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles concerning non-melanotic malignant neoplasm of the skin, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence regarding Merkel cell carcinoma. The Authority has the power to extend or restrict the application of these principles through subordinate instruments, ensuring that the principles remain relevant and accurate in light of ongoing scientific developments.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning Merkel cell carcinoma (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 80 of 2024) outlines the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting Merkel cell carcinoma with particular kinds of military service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This includes operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service (sections 5 and 6). The Statement of Principles was determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA to replace the repealed Instrument No. 7 of 2016, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. The Act imposes obligations on claimants to provide evidence linking their Merkel cell carcinoma to their military service, and on the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission to assess these claims based on the outlined factors. The instrument also facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. It ensures that medical treatment and compensation are extended to eligible persons who have Merkel cell carcinoma by specifying the necessary circumstances, thus aiding in the assessment and determination of social security benefits and other entitlements. Any failure to comply with the requirements of the Statement of Principles could result in the denial of claims for medical treatment and compensation. Although the Statement of Principles itself does not explicitly outline offences or penalties, the VEA and MRCA provide the legal framework within which claims are assessed. Breaches of these Acts could lead to civil or criminal consequences, depending on the nature and severity of the non-compliance. However, specific penalties are not detailed within the Statement of Principles but would be governed by the broader legislative provisions of the VEA and MRCA. The Statement of Principles ensures that the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents are upheld by facilitating the assessment and determination of claims. This includes the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, without discrimination. The compatibility with human rights is affirmed, as the instrument does not derogate from any human rights and promotes several rights under international covenants and conventions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Rights & Protections
Catchwords
Merkel cell carcinoma

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.