Statement of Principles concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 68 of 2024)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2024L01047 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

MENIERE DISEASE AND MENIERE SYNDROME

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 68 OF 2024)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 68 of 2024).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 108 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L01328) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning Meniere's disease.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome and death from Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 68 of 2024).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome or death from Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022 concerning Meniere's disease in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning having a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning having any of the following autoimmune diseases;
  • new factor in subsection 9(4) concerning having middle ear or inner ear surgery;
  • new factor in subsection 9(5) concerning taking hydroxychloroquine;
  • new factor in subsection 9(6) concerning taking amikacin, gentamicin, or tobramycin;
  • deleting factor concerning having otitis media; and
  • deleting the definition of 'specified list of autoimmune diseases'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to Meniere's disease in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 6 June 2024, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of the factor relating to having otitis media.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to Meniere's disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 68 of 2024

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 108 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 68 of 2024) was enacted to address the medical-scientific evidence linking Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome to specific types of service, thereby facilitating claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, determined this Statement of Principles to replace the previously repealed Instrument No. 108 of 2015. This new instrument aims to outline the minimum factors necessary to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome to particular kinds of service, thus ensuring that claims are assessed based on the most current medical-scientific evidence. The instrument was developed following an investigation into Meniere's disease and aims to promote the human rights of veterans and service personnel, ensuring fair and transparent access to benefits.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 68 of 2024) applies to veterans and current or former Defence Force members who are seeking compensation or benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Act facilitates claims by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome. The Statement of Principles sets out the minimum factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to particular kinds of service, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome with the circumstances of that service. The Act applies nationally across Australia, affecting all veterans and Defence Force members, regardless of the state or territory in which they reside. The Act includes exclusions and criteria that must be met for claimants to be eligible for compensation or benefits, such as the specific factors related to the service and the condition. The Repatriation Medical Authority may extend or restrict the application of the Act through subordinate instruments, ensuring that the provisions remain aligned with the latest medical-scientific evidence and legislative requirements.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 68 of 2024) outlines the key factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to connect these conditions with specific kinds of service rendered by a person, as required under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Statement of Principles (section 2) sets out the circumstances under which veterans and service personnel may be eligible for medical treatment and compensation related to Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome. The main operative sections of this instrument specify the conditions that must be met for a reasonable hypothesis to connect Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome with service rendered by a person, including operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service (section 5). The Statement of Principles also defines Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome, providing clarity on the medical conditions covered by this legislation (subsection 7(2)). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) is required to determine Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence, as mandated by subsection 196B(2) of the VEA (section 3). The Authority must ensure that the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles are relevant and based on the most current medical-scientific evidence. Furthermore, the Authority must facilitate the assessment and determination of claims by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, and support the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (section 2). These obligations ensure that the process for determining and assessing claims is transparent, evidence-based, and fair. Breach of the provisions outlined in the Statement of Principles can lead to various consequences. While the Statement of Principles itself does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the underlying Acts (VEA and MRCA) provide a framework for addressing non-compliance. Under the VEA, failure to adhere to the determinations and procedures outlined in the Statement of Principles could potentially lead to disputes and challenges in the assessment and determination of claims. The MRCA also provides mechanisms for reviewing and appealing decisions related to claims. In addition, any actions taken by the Authority that are found to be in breach of the legislative requirements could be subject to review and potential legal action. The maximum penalties for offences under the VEA and MRCA can include fines and, in some cases, imprisonment, depending on the specific breach and the jurisdiction's laws. In summary, the Statement of Principles concerning Meniere disease and Meniere syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 68 of 2024) sets out the factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to connect these conditions with particular kinds of service. It imposes obligations on the Repatriation Medical Authority to determine these principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence and to facilitate the assessment and review of claims. While the Statement of Principles itself does not detail specific penalties for breach, the underlying Acts provide a framework for addressing non-compliance, which may include fines, imprisonment, or legal action, depending on the nature of the breach and the relevant laws.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.