Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 7 of 2024)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2024L00038 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

MALIGNANT NEOPLASM OF THE TESTIS AND EPIDIDYMIS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 7 OF 2024)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 7 of 2024).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 3 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2014L01813) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and paratesticular tissues.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis and death from malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 7 of 2024).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis or death from malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022 concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and paratesticular tissues in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising ICD-10-AM codes for 'malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • new factor in subsection 9(2) concerning smoking cannabis;
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning having exposure to dimethylformamide;
  • new factor in subsection 9(4) concerning being employed as a firefighter;
  • new factor in subsection 9(5) concerning being employed in aircraft maintenance work; and
  • new definitions of 'joint-years of cannabis', 'MRCA' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1  Dictionary.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the testis and paratesticular tissues in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the testis and paratesticular tissues as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 7 of 2024

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 3 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 7 of 2024), enacted under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, addresses the need for updated criteria to assess claims related to malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis in veterans and current or former Defence Force members. The Repatriation Medical Authority, established under the Veterans' Entitlements Act, determined this Statement of Principles in response to the availability of new sound medical-scientific evidence, replacing the previous Statement of Principles No. 3 of 2015. This legislative instrument aims to facilitate the assessment of claims and the provision of compensation and medical treatment for eligible individuals, ensuring that the determination of benefits is based on the latest medical evidence. The policy objective is to uphold the rights of veterans and Defence Force members to social security, adequate living standards, and the highest attainable standard of health, without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 7 of 2024) applies to individuals who have served in specific kinds of service as defined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). These include operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service. The scope of this legislation is limited to claims regarding malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis or death from such conditions, and it sets out the minimum factors that must exist and be related to the service rendered for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting these conditions with the service. This instrument replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 3 of 2015 and incorporates updated medical-scientific evidence and revised definitions to reflect the latest understanding of the condition. It applies nationally within Australia, affecting both current and former Defence Force members, veterans, and their dependants who are eligible for benefits under the VEA and MRCA. The legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as outlined in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, promoting the rights of veterans and Defence Force members to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. It ensures that these rights are exercised without discrimination and is designed to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims, thus supporting the wellbeing and rehabilitation of affected individuals. The Statement of Principles is a technical instrument that improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and MRCA, reflecting the latest available evidence and ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 7 of 2024) sets out the criteria that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to particular kinds of service, before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised that the condition or death from the condition is connected to the service rendered by a person (sections 5 and 9). The kinds of service include operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Instrument is determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA (section 1). The Statement of Principles specifies the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have malignant neoplasm of the testis and epididymis (section 2). This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (section 9). The Statement of Principles promotes human rights, including the right to social security, the right to an adequate standard of living, the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, and the rights of persons with disabilities (section 4). The Authority must assess claims under the VEA and MRCA in accordance with the Statement of Principles, ensuring that claimants meet the specified criteria for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised (section 5). The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must consider the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles when assessing claims for medical treatment and compensation (section 5). Failure to comply with the Statement of Principles may result in incorrect determinations of eligibility for benefits, potentially leading to claims being denied or benefits being withheld from eligible claimants. This could result in financial hardship and a lack of access to necessary medical treatment and rehabilitation services for veterans and Defence Force members. The maximum penalty for breaches of the Statement of Principles is not specified in the legislation, but non-compliance could result in administrative or judicial review, and potential compensation for affected claimants.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Licensing & Registration
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.