Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the pancreas No. 46 of 2005

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2005L04133 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES NO. 46 of 2005

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (‘the Authority’), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (‘the VEA’) revokes Instrument No. 56 of 1997 of 4 July 1997 and Instrument No. 21 of 2002 of 9 January 2002, each of which were determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning malignant neoplasm of the pancreas.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that malignant neoplasm of the pancreas and death from malignant neoplasm of the pancreas can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined, pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA, Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the pancreas No. 46 of 2005. This Instrument will replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             Pursuant to the provisions of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (‘the MRCA’), claims for pension under the VEA or compensation under the MRCA are determined by the Repatriation Commission or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, malignant neoplasm of the pancreas or death from malignant neoplasm of the pancreas is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from the investigation concerning malignant neoplasm of the pancreas, notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazettes of 20 August 2003 and 14 July 2004, in accordance with section 196G of the VEA. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The title and format of this new Instrument have been varied, including a new titling clause 1, headnote to clause 2 and the renumbering of subsequent clauses. These changes have been introduced in order to assist users in locating the appropriate Instrument when searching the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.

 

7.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments. Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the significant differences include:

 

  • changing the definition of ‘malignant neoplasm of the pancreas’ in clause 3;
  • a new factor 6(b) relating to smokeless tobacco;
  • rewording factor 6(d) relating to chronic pancreatitis, requiring chronic pancreatitis at least five years before clinical onset;
  • deleting the factor relating to spraying or decanting DDT;
  • a new factor 6(e) relating to being obese;
  • deleting the definitions in clause 9 of ‘chronic pancreatitis’, ‘ICD code’, ‘malignant neoplasm of the exocrine pancreas’ and ‘pack year’;
  • revising the definition of ‘relevant service’ in clause 9;
  • including new definitions in clause 9 of ‘being obese’, ‘death from malignant neoplasm of the pancreas’, ‘ICD-10-AM code’, ‘pack years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products’, ‘smokeless tobacco’ and ‘terminal event; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

8.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

9.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the pancreas in the Government Notices Gazette of 20 August 2003, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.

 

10.         Following the commencement of the MRCA, the Authority published a “Further Notice of Investigations” in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 July 2004, extending the closing date for submissions in relation to the above mentioned investigation until 10 September 2004. The Authority again invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA (who include persons eligible to make a claim under the MRCA), as well as the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and any person having expertise in the field.

 

11.         Two submissions were received and considered by the Authority during the investigation.

 

12.         On 12 September 2005, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed instrument, the medical-scientific evidence considered by the Authority and drawing attention to the non-inclusion of a factor relating to spraying or decanting DDT in the proposed new instrument. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No representations were received.

 

13.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the pancreas which was advertised in the Government Notices Gazettes of 20 August 2003 and 14 July 2004.

 

14.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Statement of Principles No. 46 of 2005 was enacted in 2005 to address the medical-scientific evidence related to malignant neoplasm of the pancreas and its connection to certain types of service under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Statement of Principles was developed by the Repatriation Medical Authority, an entity established under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act, to provide clarity on the eligibility criteria for veterans and service personnel seeking compensation for malignant neoplasm of the pancreas. The primary policy objective is to ensure that claims for pension or compensation are assessed based on sound medical-scientific evidence, thus providing a fair and accurate assessment of the impact of service on the development of the condition. This instrument replaces previous Statements of Principles and incorporates updated definitions and factors to reflect the latest evidence and legal requirements.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Statement of Principles No. 46 of 2005, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, provides the framework for determining claims related to malignant neoplasm of the pancreas for veterans and service personnel. This instrument applies to individuals who have served in eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service, and who may be entitled to a pension or compensation if they have developed malignant neoplasm of the pancreas or died from it, and if it can be established that the condition is related to their service. The Authority determines the Statements of Principles, which outline the medical and service-related factors necessary for a claim to be considered valid. The instrument replaces earlier statements concerning malignant neoplasm of the pancreas and includes modifications based on the latest medical-scientific evidence, such as changes to definitions and the addition of factors like smokeless tobacco and obesity. The instrument is applicable nationally and extends to both the Commonwealth and the states and territories, governing the assessment of claims by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has determined Statement of Principles No. 46 of 2005 concerning malignant neoplasm of the pancreas, revoking the earlier Instruments No. 56 of 1997 and No. 21 of 2002. This new Statement of Principles (section 2) outlines the factors that must exist to establish a connection between malignant neoplasm of the pancreas or death from such a neoplasm and particular types of service under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). These factors must be related to eligible war service (other than operational service), defence service (other than hazardous service), or peacetime service. The obligations imposed by this Statement of Principles on parties and entities include the requirement for claimants to provide evidence that links their malignant neoplasm of the pancreas or death from such a neoplasm to their service, in accordance with the specified factors. The Repatriation Commission or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must assess claims based on these Statements of Principles (section 3). The Authority's determination process involved an investigation, notification in Government Notices Gazettes, and consideration of submissions from relevant stakeholders (sections 9 to 11). Breaches of the provisions in the Statement of Principles could lead to civil or criminal consequences, depending on the context in which they occur. While the Statement of Principles itself does not specify penalties, the underlying Acts, the VEA and the MRCA, may impose penalties for misrepresentation or fraud in claims. Under the VEA, for example, penalties can include fines or imprisonment for knowingly making a false statement in a claim (section 196B(8)). The exact penalties would depend on the specific circumstances of any breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statement of Principles
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.