Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2020)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2020L00192 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

MALIGNANT NEOPLASM OF THE NASOPHARYNX

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 9 OF 2020)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2020).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 25 of 2011 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2011L00740) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx and death from malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2020).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx or death from malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 November 2018 concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning infection with the Epstein-Barr virus;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning infection with human immunodeficiency virus;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning smoking;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning consuming alcohol;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning inhaling wood dust, with the inclusion of a note;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning inhaling formaldehyde;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(9) concerning consuming Chinese-style salted fish;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(10) concerning consuming preserved vegetables;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(11) concerning an inability to consume fresh fruit and vegetables;
  • new factor in subsection 9(12) concerning chronic sinusitis or chronic rhinitis;
  • new definitions of 'MRCA' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'Chinese-style salted fish', 'pack-years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products' and 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definition of 'alcohol'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 November 2018, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 4 October 2019, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of a factor relating to human immunodeficiency virus from the balance of probabilities Instrument.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  A minor change was made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 6 November 2018.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 9 of 2020

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 25 of 2011; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2020) was enacted to address the issue of malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx in veterans and service personnel and its connection to their service. The legislation was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The purpose of this legislation is to outline the minimum factors that must exist, connecting malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx or death from malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx to specific types of service rendered by a person, thereby raising a reasonable hypothesis. This new Statement of Principles replaces the repealed Instrument No. 25 of 2011 and incorporates updated medical-scientific evidence, ensuring that the assessment of claims for medical treatment and compensation remains accurate and relevant. The primary policy objective of this legislation is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims for medical treatment and compensation in cases of malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx, ensuring that the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents are upheld. By setting out the minimum factors required to establish a reasonable hypothesis, the legislation aims to promote the human rights of these individuals, including their right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. Additionally, the legislation ensures that these rights are exercised without discrimination, in line with international human rights standards.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Malignant Neoplasm of the Nasopharynx (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2020) applies to claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, focusing on the connection between malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx or death from such neoplasm and particular types of service rendered by individuals. The Statement of Principles identifies factors that must exist and be related to specified service types to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the disease with service circumstances. This includes operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence services under the Veterans' Entitlements Act and warlike and non-warlike services under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act. The principles assist in the assessment of claims by clarifying the required evidence and circumstances necessary for a claim to be substantiated. The legislation does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but rather relies on the sound medical-scientific evidence to determine the eligibility for benefits. The Statement of Principles has a national reach, impacting veterans and members of the Defence Force across Australia. The legislation is compatible with human rights as it promotes the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, facilitating their access to social security, healthcare, and other benefits without discrimination. The Repatriation Medical Authority, which determines these principles, ensures that the legislation aligns with international human rights standards, thereby supporting the rights to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Key Provisions

The main sections of this legislation, the Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 9 of 2020), outline the circumstances in which malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx, or death from it, can be reasonably hypothesised to be connected to certain kinds of service, as stipulated in subsection 9(1) to (12). These provisions detail the medical and service-related factors that must exist for a claim to be considered under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This includes factors such as infection with the Epstein-Barr virus, exposure to certain substances like wood dust or formaldehyde, and dietary habits such as the consumption of Chinese-style salted fish (subsections 9(1) to (12)). The Act imposes obligations on both claimants and the Repatriation Medical Authority. Claimants must provide evidence that aligns with the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles to substantiate their claim for benefits related to malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx (subsection 9). The Authority, on the other hand, is required to assess these claims based on the sound medical-scientific evidence available and determine whether a reasonable hypothesis exists that connects the condition with the service rendered (subsection 196B(2)). The Authority must also ensure that the Statement of Principles reflects the latest medical-scientific evidence, facilitating the review of claims and decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Violations or breaches of the provisions outlined in this Statement of Principles do not explicitly list specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences. However, any failure to adhere to the requirements or provide the necessary evidence as stipulated in the Act could result in the denial of a claim, which could be further contested through the review mechanisms provided under the VEA and the MRCA. The implications of non-compliance for claimants could be significant, potentially leading to the rejection of their claims for benefits. The Repatriation Medical Authority, in its role, must ensure that the application of the Statement of Principles is in line with the human rights standards, as outlined in the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, without derogating from any rights.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Health Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Law
Catchwords
Malignant neoplasm of the nasopharynx

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.