Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder No. 96 of 2007

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2007L03578 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 96 of 2007

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) revokes Instrument No. 24 of 2000 determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder and death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that malignant neoplasm of the bladder and death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 96 of 2007 concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, malignant neoplasm of the bladder or death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 21 December 2005 concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder in accordance with section 196G of the Act.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'malignant neoplasm of the bladder' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'Schistosoma haematobium';
  • revising factor 6(d) concerning aromatic amines';
  • revising factor 6(e) concerning 'systemic cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide';
  • new factor 6(f) concerning 'phenacetin';
  • new factor 6(g) concerning 'Aristolochia fangchi';
  • revising factor 6(i) concerning 'polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons';
  • new factor 6(j) concerning 'fumes';
  • new factor 6(k) concerning 'arsenic';
  • new factor 6(l) concerning 'indwelling bladder catheter';
  • new factor 6(m) concerning 'renal transplant';
  • new factor 6(n) concerning 'dialysis';
  • revising definitions of 'cumulative equivalent dose'; 'ICD-10-AM code'; 'polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • new definitions of 'an aromatic amine'; 'being exposed to arsenic as specified'; 'being exposed to fumes containing high concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons' and ' one of the aromatic amines from the specified list' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'being exposed to one of the chemicals from the specified list'; 'being exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)' and 'benzene soluble matter (BSM)'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the bladder in the Government Notices Gazette of 21 December 2005, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the bladder as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 21 December 2005.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 96 of 2007, enacted under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, was introduced to address the relationship between malignant neoplasm of the bladder and particular kinds of service rendered by individuals. This legislation was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority, which, based on sound medical-scientific evidence, determined that it is more probable than not that malignant neoplasm of the bladder and death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder can be related to certain types of service. This instrument replaces the revoked Statements of Principles and outlines the factors that must exist and be related to eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service before a connection can be made with malignant neoplasm of the bladder. The policy objective of this legislation is to ensure that veterans and service personnel receive appropriate compensation for service-related diseases by establishing clear criteria for claims based on the latest available medical-scientific evidence.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 96 of 2007, under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, establishes a Statement of Principles regarding malignant neoplasm of the bladder, replacing the previous Instrument No. 24 of 2000. This legislation applies to veterans and service personnel who have rendered eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service, and who may be affected by malignant neoplasm of the bladder or death from such a condition. The determination of this instrument applies across the Commonwealth of Australia and is effective for claims concerning service injuries, diseases, or deaths occurring on or after 1 July 2004, with decisions on compensation claims being made by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. The instrument outlines specific factors that must be present to establish a connection between malignant neoplasm of the bladder and the service rendered, taking into account the latest medical-scientific evidence. The instrument also delineates various exposure factors and conditions that could contribute to the development of the condition, reflecting the commencement of the MRCA and clarifying its application to both the VEA and the MRCA.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 96 of 2007 concern the revocation of previous provisions (subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986) and the determination of a new Statement of Principles (subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986) regarding malignant neoplasm of the bladder. This new instrument replaces the revoked Instrument No. 24 of 2000. It specifies the circumstances under which malignant neoplasm of the bladder or death from such a condition can be related to particular kinds of service, such as eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service. The instrument outlines the factors that must exist for such a connection to be made on the balance of probabilities. The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. The Authority is tasked with determining Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence. It must consider submissions from relevant parties, including veterans, service personnel, and experts in the field. The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must use these Statements of Principles to determine claims for compensation under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. These claims pertain to service injuries, diseases, or deaths that occurred on or after 1 July 2004. The new Statement of Principles must be applied to such claims, ensuring that the factors specified in the instrument are evaluated correctly. Breach of the obligations and requirements set out in the Act can result in various consequences. While the Act does not explicitly detail specific offences, failure to comply with the determinations of the Repatriation Medical Authority or the procedures set by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission could lead to disputes and potential litigation. For instance, if the Authority fails to adequately consider submissions or if the Commission improperly applies the Statement of Principles, affected parties may seek judicial review. Although the Act does not specify maximum penalties, the consequences of such breaches can include financial penalties, compensation claims, or the need for corrective actions to ensure compliance with the legislative requirements.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Military Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.