Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder No. 95 of 2007

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2007L03577 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 95 of 2007

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) revokes Instrument No. 23 of 2000 determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder and death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that malignant neoplasm of the bladder and death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 95 of 2007 concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting malignant neoplasm of the bladder or death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 21 December 2005 concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder in accordance with section 196G of the Act.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'malignant neoplasm of the bladder' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'Schistosoma haematobium';
  • revising factor 6(d) concerning aromatic amines';
  • revising factor 6(e) concerning 'systemic cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide';
  • new factor 6(f) concerning 'phenacetin';
  • new factor 6(g) concerning 'Aristolochia fangchi';
  • revising factor 6(i) concerning 'polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons';
  • new factor 6(j) concerning 'fumes';
  • new factor 6(k) concerning 'arsenic';
  • new factor 6(l) concerning 'kidney or bladder stone';
  • new factor 6(m) concerning 'indwelling bladder catheter';
  • new factor 6(n) concerning 'tetrachloroethylene or dry cleaning solvents';
  • new factor 6(o) concerning 'renal transplant';
  • new factor 6(p) concerning 'dialysis';
  • new factor 6(q) concerning 'diabetes mellitus';
  • revising definitions of 'cumulative equivalent dose'; 'ICD-10-AM code'; 'polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • new definitions of 'an aromatic amine'; 'an enclosed space'; 'being exposed to arsenic as specified' and 'being exposed to fumes containing high concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'being exposed to one of the chemicals from the specified list'; 'being exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)' and 'benzene soluble matter (BSM)'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the bladder in the Government Notices Gazette of 21 December 2005, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to malignant neoplasm of the bladder as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 21 December 2005.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 95 of 2007 was enacted in 2007 and pertains to the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This legislation addresses the issue of malignant neoplasm of the bladder, which has been found to be related to certain kinds of service. The Authority revoked the previous Instrument No. 23 of 2000 and issued a new Statement of Principles concerning malignant neoplasm of the bladder, based on sound medical-scientific evidence. The new instrument outlines the minimum factors that must exist and be related to specific types of service to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the condition with the service circumstances. The instrument also revises certain definitions and factors, adopts a new format, and specifies the date of effect. This change was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority, with the policy objective of providing clear and updated guidelines for claims related to malignant neoplasm of the bladder.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 95 of 2007, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, concerns malignant neoplasm of the bladder, replacing a previous instrument from 2000. This instrument applies to veterans and service personnel who have served in various capacities, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike services. The instrument sets out the minimum factors required to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting malignant neoplasm of the bladder with the circumstances of their service. It applies to claims for compensation for injuries, diseases, or deaths occurring on or after 1 July 2004, which are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. The instrument includes revised definitions and factors related to the condition, reflecting the latest medical-scientific evidence and clarifying the scope of the legislation for both the Veterans' Entitlements Act and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act. The Authority undertook an investigation and invited submissions from relevant organisations and individuals before finalising the instrument.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of the Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 95 of 2007 concern the revocation of Instrument No. 23 of 2000 and the establishment of a new Statement of Principles (section 2). This new Statement of Principles, which pertains to malignant neoplasm of the bladder and death from malignant neoplasm of the bladder, replaces the revoked Instrument and sets out the medical-scientific evidence and specific service-related factors that must exist to establish a connection between the condition and service rendered (section 4). The Statement of Principles also incorporates revised definitions and additional factors, such as exposure to new substances and conditions, that have been identified as relevant to the condition (section 6). The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties it governs include the requirement for claims under section 319 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 to be assessed by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in accordance with the new Statement of Principles (section 3). The Repatriation Medical Authority must ensure that the Statement of Principles accurately reflects the latest medical-scientific evidence and that it is properly communicated to relevant stakeholders, including veterans, service personnel, and their dependants (section 8). This entails advertising the intention to investigate the condition in the Government Notices Gazette and inviting submissions from interested parties (section 9). Failure to comply with the provisions of this Instrument may result in civil or criminal consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory notes, breaches of related Acts, such as the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, may incur penalties such as fines and imprisonment. For instance, under section 265 of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, a person who knowingly makes a false statement or representation in relation to a claim for a pension or allowance may be fined up to $5,000 or imprisoned for up to two years, or both. Additionally, under section 196G of the same Act, a person who contravenes any provision of the Act may be fined up to $11,000. Similar penalties may apply for breaches related to the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Prohibited Conduct
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.