Statement of Principles concerning ingrown nail (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 72 of 2024)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2024L01051 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

INGROWN NAIL

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 72 OF 2024)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning ingrown nail (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 72 of 2024).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 106 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L01326) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning ingrowing nail.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that ingrown nail and death from ingrown nail can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning ingrown nail (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 72 of 2024).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting ingrown nail or death from ingrown nail, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022 concerning ingrowing nail in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'ingrown nail' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning being treated with;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning having excessive trimming of the affected toenail;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning wearing footwear that causes compression of the toes;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning having hyperhidrosis affecting the feet;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having an inability to regularly wash feet or socks;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having diabetes mellitus;
  • deleting factor concerning inability to keep the skin of the feet dry; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'deformity of the affected digit, affected nail or the affected nail bed', 'ill-fitting footwear', 'poor foot hygiene' and 'poor nail care of the affected toenail'.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to ingrowing nail in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.
  2.              On 6 June 2024, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of the factor relating to inability to keep the skin of the feet dry.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to ingrowing nail as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 72 of 2024

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Ingrown nail

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have ingrown nail;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting ingrown nail with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 106 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning ingrown nail which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning ingrown nail (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 72 of 2024) was introduced to address the gap in the legal framework regarding the connection between ingrown nail and military service, facilitating the assessment and determination of claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. Enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the authority granted by the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, this legislative instrument aims to ensure that the qualifying conditions for medical treatment and compensation are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, promoting the human rights of veterans and Defence Force members, including their right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The instrument, which replaces the previous Statement of Principles, incorporates the latest medical-scientific evidence and specifies the circumstances under which ingrown nail can be related to military service, thereby enhancing the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the Acts.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning ingrown nail (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 72 of 2024) applies to claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It sets out the minimum factors that must exist and be related to specific kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence service, warlike, and non-warlike service, to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting ingrown nail or death from ingrown nail with the circumstances of that service. The Act is determined for the purposes of both the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, and is applicable to the Commonwealth of Australia. This Statement of Principles replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 106 of 2015, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. The Authority has ensured that this Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans and their dependents without any derogation from the rights recognised or declared in the relevant international instruments. The instrument facilitates the process of making and assessing claims for ingrown nail under the specified Acts, by outlining the factors that must be considered and ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. It also promotes the rights of veterans and current and former Defence Force members, including their right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Authority has undertaken consultation with relevant organisations and individuals prior to determining this instrument, and no changes were made following the consultation process.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statement of Principles concerning ingrown nail (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 72 of 2024) detail the specific circumstances under which claims for ingrown nail can be considered valid for compensation or medical treatment under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Statement of Principles identifies the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking ingrown nail to particular kinds of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence services under the VEA, and warlike and non-warlike services under the MRCA. Section 7(2) revises the definition of 'ingrown nail', while subsections 9(3) to 9(8) outline specific factors such as treatment history, footwear issues, hyperhidrosis, hygiene difficulties, and diabetes mellitus that are relevant to the assessment of claims. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act on the parties it governs are primarily directed at the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), which is responsible for determining the Statement of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence. The Authority must review the available evidence, consult with relevant stakeholders, and ensure that the Statement of Principles is compatible with human rights. Claimants, the Repatriation Commission, and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must also adhere to the criteria outlined in the Statement of Principles when assessing and processing claims. The Statement of Principles aims to facilitate the assessment and review processes by providing clear guidelines on what constitutes a reasonable hypothesis connecting ingrown nail with military service. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined for breach of the provisions in this Statement of Principles. However, the Authority's determinations under the VEA and MRCA are subject to review by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, which can overturn decisions if they are found to be unreasonable, unjust, or improper. The primary consequence of non-compliance with the Statement of Principles would be the denial of claims for compensation or medical treatment related to ingrown nail if the factors specified in the Statement are not met. The Authority's determinations are based on the available medical-scientific evidence, and any significant changes in the evidence could lead to revisions in the Statement of Principles, as demonstrated by the repeal and replacement of Instrument No. 106 of 2015 with this new instrument.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Medical Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.