Statement of Principles concerning human immunodeficiency virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2019)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2018L01841 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 5 OF 2019)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning human immunodeficiency virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2019).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 5 of 2010 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2010L00012) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning human immunodeficiency virus.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that human immunodeficiency virus infection and death from human immunodeficiency virus infection can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning human immunodeficiency virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2019).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting human immunodeficiency virus infection or death from human immunodeficiency virus infection, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 October 2016 concerning human immunodeficiency virus in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • changing the title of the Instrument to 'human immunodeficiency virus infection';
  • revising the definition of 'human immunodeficiency virus infection' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning 'being exposed to HIV-1 or HIV-2';
  • new factor in subsection 9(2) concerning 'genital ulcerative disease' or 'nonulcerative anogenital sexually transmitted infection' or 'herpes simplex virus type 2 anogential infection';  
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning 'depot medroxyprogesterone acetate contraception';
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning 'an infection from the specified list';
  • new definitions of 'helminthic infection', 'MRCA', 'specified list of infections' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • revising the definitions of 'being exposed to HIV-1 or HIV-2', 'relevant service' and 'specified body substance' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to human immunodeficiency virus in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 October 2016, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to human immunodeficiency virus as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 October 2016.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 5 of 2019

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Human immunodeficiency virus infection

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors linking particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have human immunodeficiency virus infection;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting human immunodeficiency virus infection with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 5 of 2010; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning human immunodeficiency virus infection which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2019) was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the authority conferred by the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislation was introduced to address the need for an updated and comprehensive set of principles that link human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection to specific kinds of service, as required under the VEA and MRCA. The legislation replaces the earlier Statement of Principles No. 5 of 2010, reflecting the latest sound medical-scientific evidence regarding HIV infection. The policy objective is to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims for medical treatment and compensation for veterans and Defence Force members who have contracted HIV, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. This approach helps to uphold the human rights of affected individuals, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning human immunodeficiency virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2019) applies to individuals who have served in various capacities under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service, as well as warlike and non-warlike service. This instrument is designed to assist claimants in making and assessing claims for medical treatment and compensation related to human immunodeficiency virus infection, and it outlines the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the infection with the service rendered. The scope of the Act is national as it pertains to Commonwealth legislation. The instrument does not contain specific exclusions but is determined based on sound medical-scientific evidence. It may be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments. The Statement of Principles was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and is compatible with human rights as recognised in international instruments, promoting rights such as social security, adequate living standards, and health. This instrument is a technical improvement to the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the two Acts and aims to ensure that benefits are awarded reasonably, proportionately, and transparently without discrimination.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning human immunodeficiency virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 5 of 2019) sets out the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis that an individual's HIV infection is related to their service (Section 5). This is applicable to various kinds of service including operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). These factors are crucial in determining claims for medical treatment and compensation under these acts. The Statement of Principles was determined based on the latest sound medical-scientific evidence available to the Repatriation Medical Authority and replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 5 of 2010. The Statement of Principles imposes obligations on claimants to provide evidence that links their HIV infection to their service, as outlined in the document. It also imposes obligations on the Repatriation Commission to assess these claims based on the specified factors and on the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to review decisions made in relation to these claims. The instrument aims to ensure that the claims process is fair, transparent, and based on the most current medical evidence. Breaches of the provisions outlined in the Statement of Principles may not directly result in civil or criminal penalties, but failure to comply with the requirements for making a claim could lead to the denial of benefits. The Statement of Principles itself does not impose specific penalties, but the acts under which claims are made (VEA and MRCA) may include provisions for penalties in cases of fraud or misrepresentation. The maximum penalties for such offences can vary and are specified in the respective acts.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.