Statement of Principles concerning herpes simplex No. 4 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L00010 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 4 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 343 of 1995, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning herpes simplex.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that herpes simplex and death from herpes simplex can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 4 of 2010 concerning herpes simplex.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, herpes simplex or death from herpes simplex is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 27 June 2007 concerning herpes simplex in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'herpes simplex' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection/exposure;
  • new factor 6(b) concerning thermal burn exposure;
  • new factor 6(c) concerning immunosuppressed state;
  • new factors 6(d) & 6(k) concerning surgery to nerve root ganglia;
  • new factors 6(e) & 6(l) concerning having surgery to the brain - for acute herpes simplex encephalitis and acute herpes simplex retinal necrosis only;
  • new factors 6(f) & 6(m) concerning having surgery to the face or having an upper respiratory tract infection – for orofacial herpes only;
  • new factor 6(g) concerning being exposed to sunlight or ultraviolet light;
  • new factors 6(h) & 6(o) concerning being at least 20 weeks pregnant;
  • revising factor 6(i) concerning thermal burn exposure;
  • revising factor 6(j) concerning immuno-compromised state now using the term immunosuppressed state;
  • revising factor 6(n) concerning being exposed to ultraviolet light, expanding the factor to include exposure to sunlight or ultraviolet light;
  • new definitions of "a significant thermal burn", "being exposed to HSV-1", "being exposed to HSV-2", "being in an immunosuppressed state", "death from herpes simplex", "ICD-10-AM code", "relevant service", "surgery to the face", and "terminal event" in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of "external thermal burns", "ICD code", "immuno-compromised state", and "primary HSV-I or HSN-II infection"; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to herpes simplex in the Government Notices Gazette of 27 June 2007, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to herpes simplex as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 27 June 2007.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 4 of 2010 was enacted to address the relationship between herpes simplex and particular kinds of military service under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This instrument revokes the previous Instrument No. 343 of 1995 concerning herpes simplex and introduces a new Statement of Principles based on the latest medical-scientific evidence. The Authority determined that it is more probable than not that herpes simplex and death from herpes simplex can be related to certain types of military service, thus establishing criteria for claims under the VEA and MRCA. The new instrument clarifies the connection between herpes simplex and specific service circumstances, such as exposure to HSV-1 or HSV-2, thermal burns, immunosuppressed states, and surgeries, among others. This legislative instrument was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority, reflecting a policy objective to ensure that veterans and service personnel receive appropriate compensation for service-related health conditions.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 4 of 2010, concerning herpes simplex, applies to veterans and service personnel who served in eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service, and who may have contracted herpes simplex or died from herpes simplex as a result of their service. The instrument outlines the medical and service-related factors that must exist for a connection to be made between herpes simplex and the service rendered, and it replaces a previous instrument concerning the same condition. This instrument serves to determine claims for compensation under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, applying to claims for service injuries, diseases, or deaths that occurred on or after 1 July 2004. The instrument’s scope is national, as it applies to all veterans and service personnel across Australia. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the instrument itself, though the specific criteria for connection to service must be met for compensation to be granted. The application of this instrument may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments issued by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the authority of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has revoked Instrument No. 343 of 1995 under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), replacing it with Instrument No. 4 of 2010 concerning herpes simplex. This new instrument was determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA, as the Authority concluded that it is more probable than not that herpes simplex and death from herpes simplex can be related to particular kinds of service based on the available medical-scientific evidence. This new Statement of Principles outlines the factors that must exist for herpes simplex or death from herpes simplex to be connected with service under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The Statement of Principles requires that specific factors must be present and related to eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service before a connection to herpes simplex or death from herpes simplex can be established. These factors include exposure to herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2, thermal burn exposure, being in an immunosuppressed state, and having certain surgeries such as to the nerve root ganglia, brain, face, or experiencing an upper respiratory tract infection. The instrument also specifies additional factors such as exposure to sunlight or ultraviolet light, and being at least 20 weeks pregnant, which can contribute to the connection between herpes simplex or death from herpes simplex and service. Claims for compensation under section 319 of the MRCA for injuries sustained, diseases contracted, or deaths occurring on or after 1 July 2004 are to be determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, using the Statements of Principles issued by the Authority. These principles must be referenced in any compensation claims, ensuring that all relevant factors are considered in determining liability. Breaches of the provisions within the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 or the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 can result in legal consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory notes, violations of these Acts can lead to civil or criminal penalties, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. The precise penalties would be determined in accordance with the respective Acts, and could include fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions as provided by law.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Prohibited Conduct
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.