Statement of Principles concerning hepatitis C No. 44 of 1995

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au C2010L00046 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Instrument No.44 of 1995

 

 

Statement of Principles

concerning

HEPATITIS C

ICD CODES: 070.41, 070.51

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
subsection 196B(3)

 

1. Being of the view that, on the sound medical-scientific evidence available to the Repatriation Medical Authority, it is more probable than not that hepatitis C and death from hepatitis C can be related to eligible war service (other than operational service) rendered by veterans and defence service (other than hazardous service) rendered by members of the Forces, the Repatriation Medical Authority determines, under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, that the factors that must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, hepatitis C or death from hepatitis C is connected with the circumstances of that service, are:

 

(a) having received a blood transfusion or blood product injection or organ transplant, that was not screened for hepatitis C, more than two weeks before the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C infection; or

 

(b) having had an injection or dental procedure or surgical procedure (including tattooing) more than two weeks before the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C infection, and for which the instruments were not sterilised; or

 

(c) having had a wound, laceration, or other injury or disease disrupting skin integrity that may have been contaminated by the body fluids of a person not shown to be hepatitis C negative, and that contamination having occurred more than two weeks before the existence of evidence of the hepatitis C infection; or

 

(d) being a parenteral drug user and sharing needles more than two                             weeks before the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C                                           infection; or

 

(e) having had unprotected sexual intercourse with a person not                              proven to be negative for hepatitis C more than two weeks before                             the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C infection; or

 

(f) inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for hepatitis C.             

 

2. Subject to clause 3 (below) at least one of the factors set out in  paragraphs 1(a) to (f), must be related to any service rendered by a               person.

 

3. The factor set out in paragraph 1(f) applies only where:

 

(a) the person’s hepatitis C was contracted prior to a period, or part of a period, of service to which the factor is related; and

 

(b) the relationship suggested between the hepatitis C and the particular service of a person is a relationship set out in paragraph 8(1)(e), 9(1)(e) or 70(5)(d) of the Act.

 

4. For the purposes of this Statement of Principles:

 

“blood product injection” means injection with a substance derived from human blood;

 

“body fluids” means blood, serum, serous discharge, saliva, tears, seminal fluid, bile or vaginal secretions;

 

“hepatitis C” means an infection with a positive strand ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus which results in antigens to hepatitis C and attracts an ICD code of 070.41 or 070.51;

 


“ICD code” means a number assigned to a particular kind of injury or disease in the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision, effective date of 1 October 1993, copyrighted by the US Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, and having the Library of Congress number 77-94472;

 

“parenteral drug user” means a person who injects or causes to be injected addictive or recreational drugs into their body;

 

“sexual intercourse” means sexual intercourse in which there is an exchange of body fluids.

 

 

Dated this  Twentieth       day of      February 1995

 

 

The Common Seal of the    )

Repatriation Medical Authority   )

was affixed to this instrument  )

in the presence of:    )

 

KEN DONALD

CHAIRMAN

Overview

The Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 was enacted to provide a legislative framework that supports and recognises the contributions and sacrifices of veterans, including those who contracted diseases such as hepatitis C as a result of their service. In addressing the specific issue of hepatitis C, the Repatriation Medical Authority issued a Statement of Principles in 1995 to clarify the circumstances under which hepatitis C or death from hepatitis C can be considered connected to eligible war service or defence service. This legislative instrument aims to ensure that veterans who contracted hepatitis C under certain conditions are eligible for appropriate benefits and support. The policy objective is to provide a clear and fair basis for determining the eligibility of veterans for compensation and related benefits concerning hepatitis C, reflecting the medical-scientific evidence available at the time.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Hepatitis C is a legislative instrument under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, established to determine the connection between hepatitis C infection and certain war or defence services rendered by veterans and members of the Australian Defence Force. It applies to veterans and members of the Forces who contracted hepatitis C and specifies the factors that must exist to establish a probable link between their infection and their service, such as exposure to unscreened blood products, unsterilised instruments, contaminated body fluids, or unprotected sexual intercourse. The legislation establishes that at least one of these factors must be related to the individual's service and applies to cases where the hepatitis C was contracted prior to the service period in question if the individual was unable to obtain appropriate clinical management. The instrument extends the application of the Act through the determination of specific factors related to hepatitis C and service, thereby clarifying the circumstances under which a veteran or defence member may claim a connection between their hepatitis C and their service for the purposes of veterans' entitlements.

Key Provisions

The main sections of this legislative instrument (C2010L00046) establish the Statement of Principles concerning hepatitis C under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. Section 1 identifies the factors that must exist to establish a probable link between hepatitis C or death from hepatitis C and eligible war service or defence service (subsection 196B(3)). The key factors include exposure to unscreened blood products or non-sterile medical procedures, injuries contaminated by body fluids, parenteral drug use, unprotected sexual contact, and lack of appropriate clinical management (section 1(a)-(f)). It is important that at least one of these factors must be related to the service rendered by the person (section 2). The factor related to the inability to obtain appropriate clinical management applies only under specific conditions (section 3(a) and (b)). The obligations and requirements imposed by this legislation primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority and the veterans or members of the Forces who may be eligible for entitlements due to hepatitis C. The Repatriation Medical Authority is required to determine whether the hepatitis C or death from hepatitis C is connected with the circumstances of the service based on the outlined factors. Veterans or members of the Forces seeking to establish a connection between their hepatitis C and their service must provide evidence of one or more of the specified factors and demonstrate that these factors relate to their service. This may involve providing medical records, testimonies, or other relevant documentation to support their claim. Breach of the provisions of this legislative instrument may lead to various consequences, though the specific penalties or sanctions are not detailed within this text. Generally, failure to comply with the requirements for establishing a connection between hepatitis C and service could result in the denial of entitlements. In more severe cases, where misrepresentation or fraud is suspected, there may be criminal consequences, although such cases are not specified in this document. The maximum penalties for any related offences would be determined by the broader legal framework governing the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and any other relevant legislation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Medical Law
Veterans’ Affairs
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.