Statement of Principles concerning hepatitis C No. 43 of 1995

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au C2010L00044 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Instrument No.43 of 1995

 

 

Statement of Principles

concerning

HEPATITIS C

ICD CODES: 070.41, 070.51

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986
subsection 196B(2)

 

1. Being of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that hepatitis C and death from hepatitis C can be related to operational service rendered by veterans, peacekeeping service rendered by members of Peacekeeping forces and hazardous service rendered by members of the Forces, the Repatriation Medical Authority determines, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986, that the factors that must as a minimum exist before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting hepatitis C or death from hepatitis C with the circumstances of that service, are:

 

(a) having received a blood transfusion or blood product injection or organ transplant, that was not screened for hepatitis C more than two weeks before the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C infection; or

 

(b) having had an injection or dental procedure or surgical procedure (including tattooing) more than two weeks before the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C infection, and for which the instruments were not sterilised; or

 

(c) having had a wound, laceration, or other injury or disease disrupting skin integrity that may have been contaminated by the body fluids of a person not shown to be hepatitis C negative, and that contamination having occurred more than two weeks before the existence of evidence of the hepatitis C infection; or

 

(d) being a parenteral drug user and sharing needles more than two                             weeks before the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C                                           infection; or

 

(e) having had unprotected sexual intercourse with a person not                              proven to be negative for hepatitis C more than two weeks before                             the existence of the evidence of the hepatitis C infection; or

 

(f) inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for hepatitis C.             

 

2. Subject to clause 3 (below) at least one of the factors set out in  paragraphs 1(a) to (f), must be related to any service rendered by a               person.

 

3. The factor set out in paragraph 1(f) applies only where:

 

(a) the person’s hepatitis C was contracted prior to a period, or part of a period, of service to which the factor is related; and

 

(b) the relationship suggested between the hepatitis C and the particular service of a person is a relationship set out in paragraph 8(1)(e), 9(1)(e), 70(5)(d), or 70(5A)(d) of the Act.

 

4. For the purposes of this Statement of Principles:

 

“blood product injection” means injection with a substance derived from human blood;

 

“body fluids” means blood, serum, serous discharge, saliva, tears, seminal fluid, bile or vaginal secretions;

 

“hepatitis C” means an infection with a positive strand ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus which results in antigens to hepatitis C and attracts an ICD code of 070.41 or 070.51;

 

“ICD code” means a number assigned to a particular kind of injury or disease in the tenth edition of the International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision, effective date of 1 October 1993, copyrighted by the US Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, and having the Library of Congress number 77-94472;

 

“parenteral drug user” means a person who injects or causes to be injected addictive or recreational drugs into their body;

 

“sexual intercourse” means sexual intercourse in which there is an exchange of body fluids.

 

 

Dated this  Twentieth            day of  February 1995

 

 

 

 

The Common Seal of the    )

Repatriation Medical Authority   )

was affixed to this instrument  )

in the presence of:    )

 

 

 

KEN DONALD

CHAIRMAN

Overview

The Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 was enacted to provide a range of benefits and services to Australian veterans, their spouses, and their children. The Act was introduced to address the needs of veterans who have been affected by their service, including those who may have contracted diseases or conditions related to their service. The Statement of Principles concerning Hepatitis C, issued in 1995, was designed to provide guidance on the circumstances in which a connection can be made between hepatitis C or death from hepatitis C and the operational, peacekeeping, or hazardous service rendered by veterans. The Repatriation Medical Authority, under subsection 196B(2) of the Act, determined that a reasonable hypothesis could be raised if specific factors existed, such as exposure to unscreened blood transfusions, non-sterilised instruments, or unprotected sexual intercourse, among others. The policy objective of this legislative instrument is to ensure that veterans who contracted hepatitis C in the course of their service receive the appropriate benefits and support.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Hepatitis C, outlined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, applies to veterans, peacekeeping force members, and members of the Australian Defence Force who have contracted hepatitis C or died from the disease in relation to their service. This legislative instrument specifies the conditions under which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting hepatitis C to service circumstances, such as through exposure to unscreened blood products, non-sterilised instruments, or unprotected sexual contact, among other factors. The legislation establishes a national scope, applying across Australia, and aims to provide medical and financial support to those affected. It is noteworthy that this legislative instrument may be subject to modifications or further clarification through subordinate instruments, ensuring the principles remain relevant and effectively address emerging circumstances or medical advancements related to hepatitis C.

Key Provisions

The legislative instrument in question, C2010L00044, contains several key provisions which are primarily concerned with establishing the connection between hepatitis C infection or death from hepatitis C and the service rendered by veterans, peacekeeping forces, or members of the Australian Defence Force. The main operative sections (1-4) detail the specific circumstances under which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting hepatitis C with service-related factors. These include receiving a blood transfusion or blood product injection not screened for hepatitis C, undergoing a procedure where instruments were not sterilised, sustaining a contaminated wound, being a parenteral drug user sharing needles, engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse with a person not proven to be negative for hepatitis C, or being unable to obtain appropriate clinical management for hepatitis C. These provisions underscore that at least one of the factors must relate to the service rendered by the individual (Section 2). The obligations imposed by this legislation primarily revolve around the provision of evidence to support a claim related to hepatitis C and service. Claimants must demonstrate that at least one of the factors outlined in Section 1 is related to their service and that this factor existed prior to the evidence of hepatitis C infection. The Repatriation Medical Authority has a responsibility to assess the evidence presented and determine if a reasonable hypothesis can be established based on the criteria set out in the Act. This involves a detailed review of medical histories, service records, and other relevant documentation to ascertain the connection between the hepatitis C infection and the service rendered. Breach of the obligations or failure to comply with the requirements stipulated in this legislation can lead to civil or criminal consequences. While the specific penalties are not detailed in the legislative instrument, breaches of provisions under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 can generally lead to penalties under the Act, which may include fines and other sanctions. The maximum penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, and could be determined by relevant courts or tribunals in accordance with the prevailing laws. Claimants must ensure they provide accurate and comprehensive evidence to substantiate their claims to avoid any potential repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans’ Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.