Statement of Principles concerning hepatitis B No. 11 of 1999

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au C2010L00052 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Instrument No.11 of 1999

 

Revocation and Determination

of

Statement of Principles

concerning

HEPATITIS B

ICD-9-CM CODES: 070.2, 070.3

 

Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986

 

 

1. The Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act):

 

(a) revokes Instrument No.41 of 1995 and Instrument No.124 of 1995; and

 

(b) determines in its place the following Statement of Principles.

 

Kind of injury, disease or death

2. (a) This Statement of Principles is about hepatitis B and death from hepatitis B.

 

(b) For the purposes of this Statement of Principles, “hepatitis B”, means infection with a partially double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) virus which results in antigens to hepatitis B, attracting ICD code 070.2 or 070.3

 

Basis for determining the factors

3. The Repatriation Medical Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that hepatitis B and death from hepatitis B can be related to relevant service rendered by veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, or members of the Forces.

 

Factors that must be related to service

4. Subject to clause 6, at least one of the factors set out in clause 5 must be related to any relevant service rendered by the person.

 

Factors

5. The factors that must as a minimum exist before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting hepatitis B or death from hepatitis B with the circumstances of a person’s relevant service are:

 

(a) in relation to hepatitis B where there is evidence of recent infection:

 

(i) having received a blood transfusion or blood product injection or organ transplant, that was not screened for hepatitis B, within the six months immediately before the existence of the evidence of the recent infection; or

 

(ii) having had an injection, or dental procedure, or surgical procedure (including tattooing) within the six months immediately before the existence of the evidence of the recent infection and for which the instruments used in those procedures were not sterilised; or

 

(iii) having had a wound, laceration, or other injury or disease disrupting skin integrity that may have been contaminated by the body fluids of a person not shown to be hepatitis B negative, and that contamination having occurred within the six months immediately before the existence of evidence of the recent hepatitis B infection; or

 

(iv) being a parenteral drug user and sharing needles with a person not shown to be hepatitis B negative within the six months immediately before the existence of the evidence of the recent hepatitis B infection; or

 

(v) having had unprotected sexual intercourse with a person not shown to be hepatitis B negative within the six months immediately before the existence of the evidence of the recent hepatitis B infection; or

 

(b) in relation to hepatitis B where there is evidence of non-recent infection:

 

(i) having been a Prisoner of War of Japan during World War 2; or

 

(ii) having served in Burma, Thailand, Malaya or Singapore in World War 2; or

 

(iii) having received a blood transfusion or blood product injection or organ transplant more than four months before the existence of the evidence of non-recent hepatitis B infection and that procedure was not screened for hepatitis B; or

 

(iv) having had an injection or dental procedure or surgical procedure (including tattooing) more than four months before the existence of the evidence of the non-recent hepatitis B infection and for which the instruments used in those procedures were not sterilised; or

 

(v) having had a wound, laceration, or other injury or disease disrupting skin integrity that may have been contaminated by the body fluids of a person not shown to be hepatitis B negative, and that contamination occurred more than four months before the existence of evidence of non-recent hepatitis B infection; or

 

(vi) being a parenteral drug user and sharing needles with a person not shown to be hepatitis B negative more than four months before the existence of the evidence of the non-recent hepatitis B infection; or

 

(vii) having had unprotected sexual intercourse with a person not shown to be hepatitis B negative more than four months before the existence of the evidence of the non-recent hepatitis B infection; or

 

(c) inability to obtain appropriate clinical management for hepatitis B.

 

Factors that apply only to material contribution or aggravation

6. Paragraph 5(c) applies only to material contribution to, or aggravation of, hepatitis B where the person’s hepatitis B was suffered or contracted before or during (but not arising out of) the person’s relevant service; paragraph 8(1)(e), 9(1)(e), 70(5)(d) or 70(5A)(d) of the Act refers.

 

Inclusion of Statements of Principles

7. In this Statement of Principles if a relevant factor applies and that factor includes an injury or disease in respect of which there is a Statement of Principles then the factors in that last mentioned Statement of Principles apply in accordance with the terms of that Statement of Principles.

 

Other definitions

8. For the purposes of this Statement of Principles:

 

“blood product injection” means the injection of material extracted from human blood;

 

“body fluids” means blood, serum, serous discharge, saliva, tears, seminal fluid, bile, or vaginal secretions;

 

“death from hepatitis B” in relation to a person includes death from a terminal event or condition that was contributed to by the person’s hepatitis B;

 

“evidence of non-recent infection” means:

(a)             declining levels of IgM anti-HBc; or

(b)             the presence of antibody to hepatitis B core Antigen (IgG anti-HBc); or

(c)             the presence of HBsAg and total anti-HBc, in the absence of IgM anti-HBc; or

(d)             the presence of total anti-HBc and anti-HBs;

 

“evidence of recent infection” means:

(a)             rising levels of hepatitis B Surface antigen (HBsAg); or

(b)             the presence of IgM antibody to hepatitis B core Antigen (IgM anti-HBc); or

(c)             converting from HBsAg negative to HBsAg positive and being positive for total anti-HBc; or

(d)             the presence of HBsAg and IgM anti-HBc;

 

“ICD-9-CM code” means a number assigned to a particular kind of injury or disease in the Australian Version of The International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), effective date of 1 July 1996, copyrighted by the National Coding Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, and having ISBN 0 642 24447 2;

 

“parenteral drug user” means a person who injects or causes to be injected addictive or recreational drugs into their body;

 

“relevant service” means:

 

(a) operational service; or

(b) peacekeeping service; or

(c) hazardous service;

 

“sexual intercourse” means sexual intercourse in which there is an exchange of body fluids.

 

“terminal event” means the proximate or ultimate cause of death and includes:

 

a) pneumonia;

b) respiratory failure;

c) cardiac arrest;

d) circulatory failure; or

e) cessation of brain function.

 

Application

9. This instrument applies to all matters to which section 120A of the Act applies.

 

 

Dated this Fourteenth day of         January 1999

 

 

The Common Seal of the    )

Repatriation Medical Authority   )

was affixed to this instrument  )

in the presence of    )

 

KEN DONALD

CHAIRMAN

 

 

Overview

The Veterans' Entitlements Amendment (Hepatitis B) Instrument 2010 (C2010L00052) was enacted to address the need for a clearer legal framework regarding the presumption of service connection for Hepatitis B among veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, and members of the Australian Defence Force. This legislative instrument, issued under the authority of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, seeks to establish a formal Statement of Principles for the consideration of claims related to Hepatitis B. The Repatriation Medical Authority, acting under the provisions of the Act, has determined that there is sufficient medical-scientific evidence to support a connection between Hepatitis B, death from Hepatitis B, and relevant military service. The policy objective of this instrument is to ensure that veterans and other eligible persons who contracted Hepatitis B during their service are provided with the necessary recognition and support, facilitating their access to relevant benefits and services.

Scope and Application

This legislative instrument, issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, revokes previous statements of principles concerning hepatitis B and death from hepatitis B and establishes new criteria for determining the connection between hepatitis B and relevant military service. The new Statement of Principles applies to veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, and members of the Australian Defence Force who have contracted hepatitis B or died from the disease, with the instrument clarifying the specific circumstances under which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised that the hepatitis B was related to their service. The instrument specifies factors that must be present, such as evidence of recent or non-recent infection, and details the conditions that must be met for these factors to be related to service. The instrument's application extends to all matters covered by section 120A of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and may be further extended or restricted by subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The instrument revokes two previous statements of principles concerning Hepatitis B ICD-9-CM codes 070.2 and 070.3 and establishes new criteria for the recognition of Hepatitis B and death from Hepatitis B as related to relevant service (section 1). This new Statement of Principles outlines the specific factors that must exist to link Hepatitis B or death from Hepatitis B to relevant service, including recent or non-recent infection evidence, specific circumstances of exposure, or inability to obtain appropriate clinical management (section 5). The instrument mandates that at least one of these factors must be related to the person's relevant service (section 4). It also incorporates other existing Statements of Principles if a relevant factor includes an injury or disease covered by those statements (section 7). Furthermore, the instrument applies to all matters governed by section 120A of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (section 9). The obligations imposed by this instrument require veterans, members of Peacekeeping Forces, or members of the Forces to provide evidence that at least one of the specified factors relating to Hepatitis B or death from Hepatitis B was connected to their relevant service. This may include medical records, witness statements, or other documentation that demonstrates exposure to Hepatitis B under the circumstances outlined in the instrument (section 5). Additionally, it requires the Repatriation Medical Authority to evaluate the evidence provided to determine if the factors meet the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles. There are no explicit offences, penalties, or consequences mentioned in the instrument for breach of its provisions. However, failure to comply with the requirements or providing false or misleading information could potentially impact the eligibility for veterans' entitlements related to Hepatitis B under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986. The consequences of such non-compliance would be determined in the context of that Act, which may include the denial or revocation of benefits.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans’ Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.