Statement of Principles concerning hallux valgus No. 92 of 2007

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2007L03567 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 92 of 2007

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) revokes Instrument No. 301 of 1995 concerning congenital hallux valgus and Instrument No. 48 of 1998 concerning acquired hallux valgus, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that hallux valgus and death from hallux valgus can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 92 of 2007 concerning hallux valgus.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, hallux valgus or death from hallux valgus is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from investigations notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 15 June 2005 concerning congenital hallux valgus and acquired hallux valgus, in accordance with section 196G of the Act.  The investigations involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'hallux valgus' in clause 3;
  • deleting the onset factor concerning pes planus';
  • revising factors 6(a) and 6(f) concerning 'ill-fitting footwear';
  • revising factors 6(b) and 6(g) concerning 'inflammatory, depositional or infective arthrosis';
  • revising factor 6(i) concerning 'amputation';
  • new factors 6(d) and 6(j) concerning 'surgery';
  • new factors 6(e) and 6(k) concerning 'trauma';
  • revising definitions of 'amputation of the second toe or the second metatarsal head'; 'death from hallux valgus' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'amputation'; 'congenital hallux valgus'; 'ICD code'; 'ICD-9-CM code'; 'osteoarthrosis' and 'pes planus' from clause 9;
  • new definitions of 'surgery to affected region' and 'trauma to the affected forefoot' in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake investigations in relation to congenital hallux valgus and acquired hallux valgus in the Government Notices Gazette of 15 June 2005, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigations.

 

9.             On 8 June 2007, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of the onset factor relating to pes planus. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

10.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigations in relation to congenital hallux valgus and acquired hallux valgus as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 15 June 2005.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 92 of 2007, enacted to address the problem of linking hallux valgus to military service, was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. This legislative instrument revokes previous instruments concerning congenital and acquired hallux valgus and replaces them with a new Statement of Principles. The policy objective of this instrument is to establish a clear connection between hallux valgus and specific types of military service, thereby enabling affected veterans to claim compensation. The Authority determined this new Statement of Principles based on the latest medical-scientific evidence, which suggests a probable link between hallux valgus and certain service conditions. The instrument specifies the factors and service types that must be considered to establish this connection and revises definitions and factors from the previous instruments to reflect updated medical understanding.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 92 of 2007 pertains to the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, specifically addressing claims related to hallux valgus, a foot deformity. This instrument applies to veterans and service personnel who have sustained or contracted hallux valgus, or who died from the condition, in relation to their service under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act or defence service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act. The new Statement of Principles, which replaces previous instruments concerning congenital and acquired hallux valgus, is designed to provide clarity on the medical-scientific evidence linking hallux valgus to certain types of service, thereby facilitating claims for compensation. The instrument is applicable nationally, covering all veterans and service personnel across Australia who meet the specified criteria related to their service. While the instrument sets out the general principles for determining compensation claims related to hallux valgus, it does not specify exclusions or thresholds within the text, though subordinate instruments may further define these aspects. The Authority's determination of this instrument concludes the investigations initiated in 2005 and finalised in 2007, ensuring that all claims are assessed based on the most current medical-scientific evidence.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), has revoked Instrument No. 301 of 1995 concerning congenital hallux valgus and Instrument No. 48 of 1998 concerning acquired hallux valgus (subsection 196B(3) of the VEA). This revocation is due to the availability of new medical-scientific evidence suggesting a probable link between hallux valgus, death from hallux valgus, and particular types of military service. To address this, the Authority has determined a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 92 of 2007 concerning hallux valgus. This new instrument will replace the previously revoked statements. This new instrument outlines the factors necessary to establish a connection between hallux valgus or death from hallux valgus and specific kinds of service under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA). These factors must relate to eligible war service (excluding operational service), defence service (excluding hazardous service), or peacetime service. The determination is based on sound medical-scientific evidence available to the Authority, including previously considered evidence, and follows investigations notified in the Government Notices Gazette of 15 June 2005. The obligations imposed by the new Statement of Principles require claimants to provide evidence that links their hallux valgus or death from hallux valgus to their service, as defined in the new instrument. This includes proving the existence of specific factors such as ill-fitting footwear, inflammatory arthrosis, or trauma to the affected forefoot, and demonstrating how these factors relate to their military service. Claimants must submit their claims for compensation in accordance with section 319 of the MRCA, which the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission will assess based on the new Statement of Principles. Breaches of the provisions set forth in this new instrument may result in penalties under the applicable Acts. While the explanatory notes do not specify maximum penalties, general provisions in the VEA and the MRCA may apply. These could include fines or other civil and criminal consequences for fraudulent claims or misrepresentation of facts. The precise penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the breach, as outlined in the respective Acts.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.