Statement of Principles concerning gout No. 31 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L01047 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 31 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 12 of 2000, as amended by Instrument No. 44 of 2003, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning gout.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that gout and death from gout can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 31 of 2010 concerning gout.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, gout or death from gout is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008 concerning gout in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'gout' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(q) concerning 'specified haematological disorder';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(r) concerning 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs';
  • revising factors 6(d) & 6(t) concerning 'lead nephropathy';
  • revising factors 6(e) & 6(u) concerning 'chemotherapy for a malignant tumour';
  • revising factors 6(f), 6(g), 6(v) & 6(w) concerning 'alcohol';
  • new factors 6(h), 6(i), 6(x) & 6(y) concerning 'red meat or offal';
  • new factors 6(j), 6(k), 6(z) & 6(aa) concerning 'seafood';
  • new factors 6(l) & 6(bb) concerning 'fructose';
  • new factors 6(m) & 6(cc) concerning 'being postmenopausal';
  • new factors 6(n) & 6(dd) concerning 'solid organ or bone marrow transplant';
  • new factors 6(o) & 6(ee) concerning 'chronic renal failure';
  • new factors 6(p) & 6(ff) concerning 'fasting';
  • new definitions of 'a specified haematological disorder', 'alcohol', 'being treated with a drug or a drug from a class of drugs as specified', 'chronic renal failure', 'red meat' and 'seafood' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'ICD-10-AM code' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'alcohol (contained within alcoholic drinks)', 'being treated with a specified drug', 'chemotherapy', 'lead nephropathy' and 'specified list of diseases'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to gout in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to gout as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 31 of 2010, enacted under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), addresses the need for updated medical-scientific evidence concerning the relationship between gout and particular kinds of military service. This legislation was introduced to rectify the outdated Instrument No. 12 of 2000, as amended by Instrument No. 44 of 2003, by providing a new Statement of Principles to determine eligibility for compensation claims related to gout. The policy objective is to ensure that compensation claims are assessed based on the most current and reliable medical evidence, thereby providing fair and accurate assessments for veterans and service personnel affected by gout. The Authority, acting under the VEA, determined this new instrument following an investigation into the medical-scientific evidence available, which concluded that it is more probable than not that gout and death from gout can be related to specific types of military service.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 31 of 2010, made under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), establishes a Statement of Principles concerning gout, thereby revoking previous instruments related to the condition. This new instrument applies to veterans and service personnel who have contracted gout or died from gout in relation to specific types of service, including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service, as outlined in the Statement of Principles. The instrument is intended to clarify the medical and service factors necessary to establish a connection between gout and service, thereby facilitating claims for compensation under the MRCA for injuries or diseases sustained on or after 1 July 2004. The Authority considered sound medical-scientific evidence and invited submissions from relevant organisations and individuals before finalising this instrument. The new format and revisions aim to align with the MRCA and improve clarity and accessibility for claimants.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority, under section 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), has revoked Instrument No. 12 of 2000 concerning gout, as amended by Instrument No. 44 of 2003, and issued a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 31 of 2010. This new instrument aims to address the connection between gout, death from gout, and certain types of service as per the latest medical-scientific evidence. The new Statement of Principles outlines the specific circumstances under which gout or death from gout can be considered related to eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service as defined in the VEA and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). These circumstances must exist on the balance of probabilities. The new Statement of Principles imposes obligations on claimants and the Authority itself. Claimants must demonstrate that the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles are related to their service. This includes providing evidence that their gout or death from gout is connected to their service in the specified categories. The Authority is obligated to assess these claims based on the evidence provided and the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles. The Authority must also ensure that the determination process is transparent and based on sound medical-scientific evidence. Additionally, the Authority is required to provide information about the new instrument to relevant organisations and invite submissions from interested parties during the investigation phase. Breach of the obligations set out in the VEA and MRCA can result in civil or criminal consequences. For example, providing false information or documents to support a claim can lead to charges of fraud, which may result in fines or imprisonment under section 136.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth). Similarly, if the Authority fails to adhere to the procedural requirements outlined in the VEA, it may face legal challenges regarding the validity of its decisions. The penalties for such breaches can vary, with potential fines and imprisonment for more severe offences. The new Statement of Principles also includes provisions for offences and penalties under the VEA and MRCA. For instance, knowingly making a false statement in a claim for benefits can result in a penalty of up to 100 penalty units under section 196D of the VEA. In more serious cases, such as those involving fraud, the penalties can be significantly higher, with potential fines and imprisonment. These provisions are designed to ensure that claims are made in good faith and that the integrity of the compensation system is maintained. The Authority is tasked with enforcing these provisions and ensuring that claimants and other parties comply with the requirements of the legislation.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.