Statement of Principles concerning gout No. 30 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L01046 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 30 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 11 of 2000, as amended by Instrument No. 43 of 2003, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning gout.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that gout and death from gout can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 30 of 2010 concerning gout.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting gout or death from gout, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008 concerning gout in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'gout' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(t) concerning 'specified haematological disorder';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(u) concerning 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs';
  • revising factors 6(c) & 6(v) concerning 'overweight';
  • revising factors 6(d) & 6(w) concerning 'lead nephropathy';
  • revising factors 6(e) & 6(x) concerning 'chemotherapy for a malignant tumour';
  • revising factors 6(f), 6(g), 6(y) & 6(z) concerning 'alcohol';
  • new factors 6(h), 6(i), 6(aa) & 6(bb) concerning 'red meat or offal';
  • new factors 6(j), 6(k), 6(cc) & 6(dd) concerning 'seafood';
  • new factors 6(l) & 6(ee) concerning 'fructose';
  • new factors 6(m) & 6(ff) concerning 'being postmenopausal';
  • new factors 6(n) & 6(gg) concerning 'solid organ or bone marrow transplant';
  • new factors 6(o) & 6(hh) concerning 'chronic renal failure';
  • new factors 6(p) & 6(ii) concerning 'hypertension';
  • new factors 6(q) & 6(jj) concerning 'dyslipidaemia';
  • new factors 6(r) & 6(kk) concerning 'type 2 diabetes mellitus';
  • new factors 6(s) & 6(ll) concerning 'fasting';
  • new definitions of 'a specified haematological disorder', 'alcohol', 'being overweight', 'being treated with a drug or a drug from a class of drugs as specified', 'chronic renal failure', 'dyslipidaemia', 'red meat' and 'seafood' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'ICD-10-AM code' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'alcohol (contained within alcoholic drinks)', 'being obese', 'being treated with a specified drug', 'chemotherapy', 'lead nephropathy' and 'specified list of diseases'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to gout in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to gout as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 30 of 2010 amends the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 by addressing the issue of gout and its relation to military service. The instrument revokes the previous Instrument No. 11 of 2000, as amended, and introduces a new Statement of Principles concerning gout, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. This instrument was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, aiming to provide clarity and updated criteria for determining compensation claims related to gout in veterans. The instrument sets out the minimum factors required to establish a connection between gout, death from gout, and specific types of military service, thereby formalising the process for veterans seeking compensation. The new instrument incorporates changes in format and definitions to align with the current legislative framework and to ensure consistency with the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 30 of 2010, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), sets out a new Statement of Principles concerning gout, replacing previous instruments. This instrument applies to veterans who have served in various capacities including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service, and it specifies the medical-scientific evidence required to establish a connection between gout or death from gout and the circumstances of their service. The Authority's determination is made in light of sound medical-scientific evidence and is intended to guide claims for compensation. This new instrument is applicable nationally in Australia and affects all veterans who may have sustained or contracted gout or experienced death from gout due to their service. The Authority has revised the definition of 'gout' and introduced new factors and definitions to reflect updated medical understanding, while ensuring consistency with the MRCA, which governs compensation claims from July 1, 2004, onwards. The Authority's decision process involved advertising the investigation in the Government Notices Gazette and inviting submissions from relevant organisations and individuals. The instrument does not specify exclusions or thresholds but is subject to the broader provisions of the VEA and MRCA.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) has revoked Instrument No. 11 of 2000, as amended by Instrument No. 43 of 2003, which concerned gout, and issued a new Instrument No. 30 of 2010 (section 1). This new instrument, under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), establishes a Statement of Principles regarding gout. This Statement outlines the minimum factors that must exist and be related to specific types of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, and hazardous service, to establish a connection between gout or death from gout and the service circumstances (section 4). The new Instrument replaces the previous one and incorporates the latest revised Instrument format, which began in 2005 (section 6). The Statement of Principles in Instrument No. 30 of 2010 sets forth the specific service-related factors that need to be present for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised linking gout or death from gout to service conditions (section 4). The Authority has made several revisions to the definitions and factors concerning gout, including updating terms such as 'specified haematological disorder', 'alcohol', 'being overweight', and others, and adding new factors like'red meat or offal', 'seafood', 'fructose', and more (section 6). Additionally, the Instrument clarifies that it applies for both the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), as per subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA (section 7). Before determining the new Instrument, the Authority notified its intention to investigate gout in the Government Notices Gazette of 9 January 2008 and invited submissions from relevant organisations and individuals (section 8). The Authority received one submission for consideration during the investigation (section 9). This process culminated in the determination of Instrument No. 30 of 2010, finalising the investigation into gout as advertised (section 10). The new Instrument imposes obligations on claimants and the Authority to ensure that the Statement of Principles is adhered to in claims for compensation related to gout under the VEA and MRCA. The Authority must determine the validity of claims based on the factors and definitions outlined in the Instrument, while claimants need to provide evidence connecting their gout or death from gout to the specified service factors. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Instrument may result in the rejection of a claim. Any breach of the provisions concerning the determination and application of the Statement of Principles could potentially lead to legal consequences, although specific penalties are not outlined in the explanatory notes.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.