Statement of Principles concerning gastro-oesophageal reflux disease No. 11 of 2005

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2005L00824 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 11 of 2005

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (‘the Authority’), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (‘the VEA’) revokes Instrument No. 52 of 2002 of 6 August 2002, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and death from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and death from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 11 of 2005 concerning gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (‘the MRCA’) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or death from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 18 December 2002 concerning gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in accordance with section 196G of the Act. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2003;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • changing the definition of ‘gastro-oesophageal reflux disease’ in clause 2;
  • factors 5(c) and (n) relating to smoking cigarettes or equivalent tobacco products requires at least ten cigarettes per day for a continuous period of at least six months immediately before clinical onset or worsening;
  • factors 5(d) and (o) relating to alcohol consumption requires an average of at least 300 grams of alcohol per week for a continuous period of at least twelve months immediately before clinical onset or worsening;
  • factors 5(e) and (p) relating to surgery requires a procedure to the region of the oesophageal hiatus of the diaphragm within the three months before clinical onset or worsening;
  • new factors 5(f) and (q) relating to gastrectomy;
  • new factors 5(j) and (u) relating to eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a person with chronic gastritis;
  • new factors 5(k) and (v) relating to Sjögren’s syndrome;
  • new factor 5(x) relating to being treated with doxycycline at the time of clinical worsening;
  • new factor 5(y) relating to being treated with a drug reported to have caused acute erosive oesophagitis at the time of clinical worsening;
  • deleting the previously included factor relating to being treated with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug at the time of the clinical onset;
  • deleting the definition of ‘area of the lower oesophageal sphincter’, ‘pack years of cigarettes or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products’ and ‘smooth muscle relaxant drug’ in clause 8;
  • revising the definition of ‘ICD-10-AM code’, ‘relevant service’ and ‘Zollinger-Ellison syndrome’ in clause 8;
  • including new definitions of ‘a smooth muscle relaxant drug’ and ‘Sjögren’s syndrome’ in clause 8; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 10.

 

7.             Further changes to the format and wording of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             The Instrument refers to, but does not incorporate by reference, The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM), effective date of 1 July 2004, copyrighted by the National Centre for Classification in Health, Sydney, NSW, and having ISBN 1 86487 594 1. This publication is available for purchase from the National Centre for Classification in Health, The University of Sydney, PO Box 170, Lidcombe NSW 1825.

 

9.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the Government Notices Gazettes of 18 December 2002, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.

 

10.         Following the commencement of the MRCA, the Authority published a “Further Notice of Investigations” in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 July 2004, extending the closing date for submissions in relation to the above mentioned investigation until 10 September 2004. The Authority again invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA (who include persons eligible to make a claim under the MRCA), as well as the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and any person having expertise in the field. One submission was received and considered by the Authority during the investigation.

 

11.         On 12 November 2004, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument, the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority and emphasising the deletion of the factor relating to being treated with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug at the time of the clinical onset. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No representations were received.

 

12.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazettes of 18 December 2002.

 

13.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

 

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 11 of 2005, issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, addresses the issue of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and death from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in relation to service rendered by veterans. The instrument was introduced to establish a Statement of Principles that identifies the circumstances under which such conditions can be connected to service, thereby guiding compensation claims. The instrument revokes the previous Instrument No. 52 of 2002, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence and revised criteria for assessing claims. This legislative instrument was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority, operating under the authority of the Veterans' Entitlements Act, to ensure that veterans' claims for compensation are assessed fairly and in accordance with current medical understanding. The policy objective is to provide clear guidelines for the connection between service and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, facilitating appropriate compensation for affected veterans.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 11 of 2005 is an instrument under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, concerning gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. It applies to individuals who have served in operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, or non-warlike service, and who are seeking compensation for a service injury, disease, or death related to gastro-oesophageal reflux. The instrument sets out the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking gastro-oesophageal reflux disease or death from this condition to specific kinds of service. This new instrument replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 52 of 2002. The Authority’s determination of this instrument follows an investigation into gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, with submissions invited from relevant organisations and experts. The instrument’s changes include updated criteria, such as revised definitions and factors relating to smoking, alcohol consumption, surgery, and other medical treatments or conditions that may be linked to gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The instrument also clarifies that it applies for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA, following the commencement of the latter Act.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), has issued Instrument No. 11 of 2005, which revokes the previous Instrument No. 52 of 2002 concerning gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and death from GERD. This new instrument, in line with subsection 196B(2) of the VEA, provides a Statement of Principles that establishes the conditions under which GERD or death from GERD can be connected to certain types of service. This Statement of Principles is applicable to operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service as defined under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The new instrument outlines the minimum factors that must exist and be related to the service rendered to raise a reasonable hypothesis linking GERD or death from GERD to the service circumstances. These factors include specific service-related conditions such as smoking, alcohol consumption, surgical procedures, and other medical treatments. The instrument also revises definitions and adopts a new format that aligns with the commencement of the MRCA. Claims for compensation under the MRCA that commenced on 1 July 2004 are now determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, using these Statements of Principles. The Authority is responsible for ensuring that the Statement of Principles reflects the latest medical-scientific evidence. The Authority conducted an investigation and invited submissions from relevant parties, including the Repatriation Commission, organisations representing veterans, and experts in the field. The instrument incorporates the latest revisions and clarifies the scope of application for both the VEA and the MRCA. It also addresses specific factors such as the amount of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption required to meet certain criteria and introduces new factors like gastrectomy and Sjögren’s syndrome. Failure to comply with the provisions of this instrument could result in legal consequences. For example, inaccuracies or non-compliance in the application of the Statement of Principles during compensation claims could lead to disputes or legal challenges. The Authority’s determination of the instrument is final, and any subsequent investigations or claims must adhere to the outlined principles and factors. The Authority’s process of advertising intentions, inviting submissions, and considering expert opinions ensures that the instrument is based on robust evidence and stakeholder input, providing a fair and transparent basis for determining liability and compensation claims.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Military Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.