Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 51 of 2024)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2024L00753 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

GASTRIC ULCER AND GASTRIC EROSION

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 51 OF 2024)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 51 of 2024).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 61 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L00657) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that gastric ulcer and gastric erosion and death from gastric ulcer and gastric erosion can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 51 of 2024).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting gastric ulcer and gastric erosion or death from gastric ulcer and gastric erosion, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022 concerning gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'gastric ulcer and gastric erosion' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising ICD-10-AM codes for 'gastric ulcer and gastric erosion' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning having Helicobacter pylori infection;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning having an infection of the gastric mucosa;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning undergoing a course of radiotherapy;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning undergoing 90Yttrium microsphere therapy;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having contact with a nasogastric tube;
  • new factor in subsection 9(11) concerning having bariatric surgery involving sleeve gastrectomy or gastric banding;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(13) concerning smoking;
  • new factor in subsection 9(15) concerning having a solid organ or bone marrow transplant;
  • new factor in subsection 9(16) concerning being treated with an antineoplastic agent;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(17) concerning being treated with one of the following drugs or class of drugs;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(18) concerning being treated with one of the following drugs or class of drugs, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(19) concerning being treated with one of the following drugs or class of drugs, for clinical worsening only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(20) concerning experiencing a category 1A stressor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(22) concerning being diagnosed by a registered medical practitioner with anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder or panic disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(24) concerning having alcohol use disorder;
  • new factor in subsection 9(25) concerning having diabetes mellitus;
  • new factor in subsection 9(26) concerning having Crohn disease;
  • new factor in subsection 9(27) concerning having one of the following medical conditions;
  • new factor in subsection 9(28) concerning having chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
  • deleting factors concerning experiencing a category 1B stressor;
  • new definitions of 'antineoplastic agent', 'MRCA', 'systemic mastocytosis', and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definition of 'critical illness or injury' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'a category 1A stressor', 'a category 1B stressor', 'a clinically significant disorder of mental health as specified', 'a corpse', 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from Specified List 1', 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from Specified List 2', 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from Specified List 3', 'a specified infection', 'an eye witness', 'being treated with an immunosuppressive drug' and 'pack-year of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 16 April 2024, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to 'category 1B stressor'.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 1 November 2022.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 51 of 2024

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Gastric ulcer and gastric erosion

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have gastric ulcer and gastric erosion;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting gastric ulcer and gastric erosion with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 61 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 51 of 2024) was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument was introduced to address the need for an updated and comprehensive set of principles connecting gastric ulcer and gastric erosion to specific service circumstances, facilitating the assessment and determination of claims for medical treatment and compensation under the VEA and MRCA. The Authority repealed the previous Instrument No. 61 of 2015, which was determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA, due to advancements in medical-scientific evidence. The new Statement of Principles specifies the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting gastric ulcer and gastric erosion with particular kinds of service, thus ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Authority conducted an investigation into gastric ulcer and gastric erosion, advertised in the Government Notices Gazette on 1 November 2022, and sought submissions from relevant organisations and experts. After considering the sound medical-scientific evidence, the Authority determined the Statement of Principles, which reflects recent developments in the field. This legislative instrument aims to improve the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and MRCA, ensuring that claimants and the Repatriation Commission and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission can effectively assess and determine claims. The Authority emphasised the deletion of factors relating to 'category 1B stressor' and provided an opportunity for representations, though no submissions were received, and no changes were made to the proposed instrument following this consultation process. The new Statement of Principles replaces the previous one and outlines the factors necessary for raising a reasonable hypothesis concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion in relation to service, ensuring that the rights of veterans and their dependents are protected and promoted.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 51 of 2024) applies to veterans and Defence force members who may have developed gastric ulcers or gastric erosions as a result of their service. Specifically, it governs claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), setting out the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons. The factors outlined in the Statement of Principles must exist and relate to particular kinds of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. This Instrument replaces the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 61 of 2015 and reflects the latest medical-scientific evidence concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion. The Instrument does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but provides a comprehensive framework for determining claims. Additionally, the Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes several human rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and gastric erosion (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 51 of 2024) sets out the minimum factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting gastric ulcer and gastric erosion, or death from gastric ulcer and gastric erosion, with the service circumstances of a person (sections 7 to 28). These factors include specific medical conditions and treatments, stress factors, and other relevant exposures or activities during service. This Statement of Principles applies to claims under both the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) (sections 4 and 5). The Act imposes specific obligations on the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) to ensure that the Statement of Principles is based on sound medical-scientific evidence and to consult relevant stakeholders during the determination process. The Authority must advertise its intention to investigate and invite submissions from interested parties, although no submissions were received for this particular Instrument (sections 8 and 9). The Authority must also ensure that the Instrument is compatible with human rights as recognised in international instruments, which it has confirmed through a Statement of Compatibility (sections 10 and 11). There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined for breach of the Statement of Principles itself. However, the underlying legislation, the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, provides for various penalties in relation to fraudulent claims or misrepresentations. For example, section 182 of the VEA imposes a maximum penalty of $13,200 or imprisonment for two years, or both, for knowingly making a false statement or representation in a claim for benefits. Similarly, section 183 imposes penalties for false statements or representations in connection with a claim for benefits, with a maximum penalty of $26,400 or imprisonment for five years, or both, depending on the severity of the offence. These penalties reflect the seriousness of fraudulent conduct in relation to veterans' entitlements.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Health Law
Instrument
Statement of Principles
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.