Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer No. 57 of 2006

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2006L03572 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 57 of 2006

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (‘the Authority’), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (‘the VEA’) revokes Instrument No. 21 of 1999 of 25 February 1999 determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning peptic ulcer disease and death from peptic ulcer disease.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer and death from gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 57 of 2006 concerning gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (‘the MRCA’) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer, or death from gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 23 June 2004 concerning peptic ulcer disease in accordance with section 196G of the Act. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments. Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • renaming the Statements of Principles 'gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer', which was previously known as 'peptic ulcer disease';
  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • including the definition of ‘gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer’ in clause 3 in lieu of the definition for 'peptic ulcer disease';
  • rewording factors 6(a) & 6(k) concerning prisoner of war;
  • rewording factors 6(b) & 6(l) concerning Helicobacter pylori;
  • rewording and expanding factors 6(c) & 6(m) concerning anti-inflammatory drug;
  • rewording and expanding factors 6(d) & 6(n) concerning smoking;
  • new factors 6(e) & 6(o) concerning gastrin-secreting tumour;
  • new factor 6(f) concerning immunosuppressive therapy;
  • new factor 6(g) concerning nasogastric tube or other foreign body;
  • new factors 6(h) & 6(p) concerning critical illness or injury;
  • new factors 6(i) & 6(q) concerning drug treatment;
  • new factors 6(j) & 6(r) concerning corticosteroids;
  • rewording factor 6(s) concerning inability to obtain appropriate clinical management;
  • revising the definition of 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'death from peptic ulcer disease'; 'Helicobacter pylori infection'; and 'ICD-9-CM code', from clause 9;
  • including new definitions of 'a drug from specified list 1'; 'a drug from specified list 2'; 'critical illness or injury'; 'death from gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer'; 'ICD-10-AM code'; and 'pack year of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products', in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to peptic ulcer disease in the Government Notices Gazettes of 23 June 2004, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.

 

9.             Following the commencement of the MRCA, the Authority published a “Further Notice of Investigations” in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 July 2004, extending the closing date for submissions in relation to the above mentioned investigation until 10 September 2004. The Authority again invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA (who include persons eligible to make a claim under the MRCA), as well as the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and any person having expertise in the field. Two submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

10.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer as advertised in the Government Notices Gazettes of 23 June 2004.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 57 of 2006, issued under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), addresses the gap in existing legislation regarding the relationship between gastric and duodenal ulcers, and certain types of military service. This instrument revokes the previous Instrument No. 21 of 1999 concerning peptic ulcer disease, and introduces a new Statement of Principles to better align with current medical-scientific evidence. The Authority, pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA, determined the new Statement of Principles to replace the revoked ones, focusing on the conditions under which gastric and duodenal ulcers, and their associated deaths, can be related to military service. The Authority's decision was based on an investigation published in the Government Notices Gazette, which solicited submissions from relevant organisations and experts. The new instrument provides clarity on the types of service that must be related to the condition, thereby assisting claimants in establishing a connection between their service and their medical condition for compensation purposes.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 57 of 2006, issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, revokes Instrument No. 21 of 1999, which concerned peptic ulcer disease and death from peptic ulcer disease, and introduces a new Statement of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. This instrument applies to veterans and service personnel, specifically addressing claims related to operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service. The new instrument replaces the previously revoked one, providing updated criteria for determining a connection between gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer, or death from these conditions, and the service rendered by a person. The instrument was developed after an investigation by the Authority, which involved reviewing sound medical-scientific evidence and inviting submissions from relevant stakeholders. The new Statement of Principles incorporates changes such as rewording and expanding certain factors, adding new factors, and updating definitions to reflect the latest medical understanding. The instrument is effective from a specified date and applies nationally, covering claims for injuries and diseases sustained or contracted on or after 1 July 2004, as per the provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 57 of 2006 revokes Instrument No. 21 of 1999, which was previously concerned with peptic ulcer disease and death from peptic ulcer disease, and establishes new Statements of Principles concerning gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. These new provisions, detailed under section 4 of the instrument, outline the factors necessary to establish a connection between gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer, or death from such conditions, and service rendered by a person, whether operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, or non-warlike. The instrument specifies that these factors must be related to the kind of service provided to raise a reasonable hypothesis of connection. The changes in the instrument reflect an updated format and new definitions, such as 'gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer', and definitions for terms like 'critical illness or injury', and 'ICD-10-AM code', among others. The obligations imposed by this instrument on the parties governed by it primarily involve the provision of evidence that aligns with the factors listed in the new Statements of Principles. Claimants must demonstrate that the gastric ulcer or duodenal ulcer, or death from such conditions, is connected to the service they provided. This requires the submission of relevant medical evidence and documentation that satisfies the criteria set out in the instrument. The Authority's role includes assessing the evidence provided and determining whether the connection to service can be established based on the factors outlined in the instrument. Breaches of the obligations under this instrument may not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties within the explanatory notes. However, the implications of failing to meet the criteria or provide sufficient evidence could result in the denial of claims for compensation or benefits related to gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, which handles claims under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, would be the body responsible for assessing claims and determining liability in accordance with the Statements of Principles. Consequently, claimants who cannot substantiate their claims according to the instrument's requirements would not be eligible for compensation or benefits.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.