Statement of Principles concerning frostbite (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2026)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2026L00459 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

FROSTBITE

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 37 OF 2026)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning frostbite (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2026).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 11 of 2018 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2018L00013) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning frostbite.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that frostbite and death from frostbite can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning frostbite (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2026).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting frostbite or death from frostbite, with the circumstances of that service. The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 August 2025 concerning frostbite in accordance with section 196G of the VEA. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2; and
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning inability to obtain appropriate clinical management

Incorporation

  1.              This Instrument refers to The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM), Tenth Edition, effective date of 1 July 2017, copyrighted by the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority, ISBN 978-1-76007-296-4.

The reference to the ICD-10-AM in this instrument is included for contextual and explanatory purposes only. Although not incorporated by reference, information about the ICD-10-AM can be obtained upon application in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority either via our website at www.rma.gov.au or postal address GPO Box 1014, Brisbane, Queensland 4001.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to frostbite in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 August 2025, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to frostbite as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 August 2025.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 37 of 2026

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: frostbite

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have frostbite;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting frostbite with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 11 of 2018; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning frostbite which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning frostbite (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2026) was determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) and applies to claims under both the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA). The Statement of Principles is a legislative instrument that outlines the minimum factors required to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting frostbite or death from frostbite with specific kinds of military service. This instrument replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 11 of 2018 and reflects the most recent medical-scientific evidence available. The purpose of this Statement of Principles is to facilitate the assessment of claims for benefits and compensation related to frostbite, ensuring that claimants and the relevant Commissions can rely on a clear and evidence-based framework for determining eligibility. The Authority undertook an investigation into frostbite and published a notice of intention to investigate in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 August 2025, inviting submissions from relevant organisations and individuals. Although no submissions were received, the Authority determined the Statement of Principles based on the available sound medical-scientific evidence. The instrument facilitates the assessment and review of claims, promotes the human rights of veterans and their dependents by ensuring access to social security and healthcare benefits, and ensures that the rights of all claimants are exercised without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning frostbite (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2026) applies to individuals who have served in various capacities under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, including those who have rendered operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, or British nuclear test defence service, as well as those who have participated in warlike or non-warlike service. This legislative instrument is designed to assist in the determination of claims related to frostbite by specifying the conditions under which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised that the frostbite is connected to the service rendered. The instrument is applicable nationally, covering all veterans and Defence Force members who fall under its purview and seek benefits or compensation related to frostbite. This Statement of Principles replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 11 of 2026 and incorporates recent advancements in medical-scientific evidence. It is also noted that while the International Classification of Diseases is referenced for contextual purposes, it is not incorporated by reference in this instrument. The instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans and their dependents without any infringement on existing human rights.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning frostbite (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 37 of 2026) outlines the minimum factors that must exist in order to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting frostbite, or death from frostbite, with specific types of service rendered by a person (section 5). This Statement of Principles applies to claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It specifies the types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence service, warlike, and non-warlike service, that must be related to the frostbite or death from frostbite for the hypothesis to be considered reasonable. The Statement of Principles was determined based on the available sound medical-scientific evidence and replaces the previous Instrument No. 11 of 2018. The obligations imposed by this Statement of Principles are primarily on the Repatriation Medical Authority, which is responsible for determining the principles, and on the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, which are responsible for assessing claims under the VEA and the MRCA, respectively. Claimants must provide evidence that demonstrates the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles, linking their frostbite or death from frostbite to the specified types of service. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must then assess the claims based on the evidence provided and the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles. There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil or criminal consequences outlined in the Statement of Principles itself. However, any breaches of the requirements under the VEA or the MRCA, such as providing false or misleading information in a claim, could result in civil or criminal penalties under those Acts. For example, under section 228 of the VEA, a person who makes a false statement or representation in relation to a claim can be liable to a fine of up to $5,250 or imprisonment for up to two years, or both. Similarly, under section 152 of the MRCA, a person who makes a false statement or representation in relation to a claim can be liable to a fine of up to $5,250 or imprisonment for up to two years, or both. These penalties reflect the seriousness of making false or misleading claims and the importance of ensuring that the benefits provided under the VEA and the MRCA are only extended to those who are eligible.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.