Statement of Principles concerning frostbite No. 23 of 2009

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2009L01590 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 23 of 2009

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 166 of 1995 determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning frostbite.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that frostbite and death from frostbite can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 23 of 2009 concerning frostbite.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting frostbite or death from frostbite, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007 concerning frostbite in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'frostbite' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'freezing temperatures';
  • new definitions of 'death from frostbite', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'relevant service' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • deleting definition of 'ICD code'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to frostbite in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to frostbite as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 23 of 2009, enacted under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), addresses the issue of determining eligibility for compensation related to frostbite among military personnel. This legislative instrument was introduced to provide a clear framework for assessing the relationship between frostbite and specific types of military service, replacing the previously revoked Instrument No. 166 of 1995. The Repatriation Medical Authority, acting under the authority of the VEA, determined this new Statement of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence, establishing criteria for the acceptance of liability for frostbite and related deaths. This instrument ensures that claims for compensation for frostbite and related injuries sustained on or after 1 July 2004 are assessed according to the updated criteria, reflecting the latest medical understanding and legislative changes.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 23 of 2009 under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 establishes a new Statement of Principles concerning frostbite, replacing the previously revoked Instrument No. 166 of 1995. This legislation applies to veterans and service personnel who have sustained frostbite or died from frostbite as a result of their service, specifically operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service. The instrument sets out the minimum factors required to establish a connection between frostbite or death from frostbite and the service circumstances. This new instrument is determined for the purposes of both the Veterans' Entitlements Act and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, and it incorporates the latest revised format. Any changes to the application of this instrument may be made through subordinate instruments, although no such changes are currently indicated.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) has revoked Instrument No. 166 of 1995 concerning frostbite, and replaced it with a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 23 of 2009 (section 2). This new instrument details the factors that must exist, and which must be related to specific kinds of service, before a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting frostbite or death from frostbite with the circumstances of that service. The relevant kinds of service are: operational service under the VEA, peacekeeping service under the VEA, hazardous service under the VEA, warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), and non-warlike service under the MRCA (section 4). This new instrument also incorporates the latest revised Instrument format, revises definitions, and specifies a date of effect (section 6). The Authority's obligations include advertising its intention to investigate frostbite in the Government Notices Gazette, inviting submissions from relevant parties, and considering the latest medical-scientific evidence (section 8). The Authority must determine Statements of Principles for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA, as clarified by the revised Instrument format (section 7). Once the Authority determines a Statement of Principles, it must be published and made available to relevant persons and organisations upon request (section 10). There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences mentioned in the explanatory notes for breaching the provisions of the new Statement of Principles. However, the Authority's determinations under the VEA and MRCA are subject to judicial review and the general principles of administrative law, which may provide avenues for redress if a party believes their rights have been infringed. The maximum penalties for offences under the VEA and MRCA would depend on the specific provisions of those Acts and the nature of the offence committed.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Medical Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.