Statement of Principles concerning fracture No. 54 of 2006

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2006L03563 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 54 of 2006

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (‘the Authority’), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (‘the VEA’) revokes Instrument No. 12 of 1994 of 8 September 1994, as amended by Instrument No. 220 of 1995 of 1 June 1995, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning fracture and death from fracture.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that fracture and death from fracture can be related to particular kinds of service. The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 54 of 2006 concerning fracture. This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (‘the MRCA’) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, fracture or death from fracture is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 19 November 2003 concerning fracture in accordance with section 196G of the Act. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of ‘fracture’ in clause 3;
  • rewording factors 6(a) & 6(j) concerning trauma;
  • rewording factor 6(b) concerning Paget's disease;
  • rewording and including separate factors 6(c) & 6(d) concerning osteoporosis and osteomalacia;
  • new factor 6(e) & 6(k)concerning osteonecrosis;
  • rewording factors 6(f) & 6(l)concerning infection;
  • rewording factor 6(g) concerning malignant neoplasm;
  • rewording factor 6(h) concerning benign neoplasm;
  • rewording 6(i) concerning stress fracture;
  • new factor 6(m) concerning stress fracture;
  • deleting the factors concerning Paget's disease; osteoporosis or osteomalacia; malignant neoplasm; and benign tumour, relating to the clinical worsening of fracture;
  • revising the definition of 'osteomalacia' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'benign tumour of the bone'; 'ICD code'; 'malignant neoplasm'; mycotic, suppurative or syphilitic infection'; 'osteoporosis'; and 'Paget's disease', from clause 9;
  • including new definitions of 'death from fracture'; 'osteonecrosis'; 'relevant service'; 'repetitive loading stress'; and 'terminal event', in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to fracture in the Government Notices Gazettes of 19 November 2003, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants. The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.

 

9.             Following the commencement of the MRCA, the Authority published a “Further Notice of Investigations” in the Government Notices Gazette of 14 July 2004, extending the closing date for submissions in relation to the above mentioned investigation until 10 September 2004. The Authority again invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA (who include persons eligible to make a claim under the MRCA), as well as the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission and any person having expertise in the field. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

10.         On 18 August 2006, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument, the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to 'Paget's disease', 'osteoporosis or osteomalacia', 'malignant neoplasm affecting the bone' and 'benign tumour of the bone’. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

11.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to fracture as advertised in the Government Notices Gazettes of 19 November 2003.

 

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available, on written request, from the Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 54 of 2006, enacted under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, was introduced to address the need for updated medical-scientific evidence regarding the connection between fractures and specific types of military service. This legislation aims to establish a Statement of Principles concerning fracture, replacing the previous revoked instruments from 1994 and 1995. The instrument delineates the factors that must exist, and which factors must be related to certain kinds of service, before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, a fracture or death from fracture is connected with the circumstances of that service. The instrument was developed following an investigation by the Authority, which examined the latest medical-scientific evidence, and was finalised after no submissions were received during the review period. This legislative instrument serves to clarify and update the criteria for determining compensation claims related to fractures under both the Veterans' Entitlements Act and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004.

Scope and Application

The Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 establish the framework for the Repatriation Medical Authority's determination of Statements of Principles concerning service-related medical conditions, including fractures. The Authority, under the provisions of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act, has determined a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 54 of 2006, which supersedes the previously revoked Instruments concerning fractures. This Statement of Principles applies to veterans, service personnel, and their dependants who may have sustained fractures during eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service. The new instrument outlines the medical-scientific evidence necessary to establish a connection between the fracture and the service, providing clarity on the types of service and conditions that must be met for a claim to be substantiated. The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, established by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, is tasked with assessing claims for compensation under the new legal framework, referencing the Statements of Principles issued by the Authority. The Authority's determination process involved an extensive investigation and consultation with relevant stakeholders, including veterans' organisations and medical experts, to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the medical-scientific evidence underpinning the Statement of Principles.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority has issued Instrument No. 54 of 2006, revoking Instrument No. 12 of 1994 concerning fracture and death from fracture, and replacing it with a new Statement of Principles (section 2). This new instrument, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), establishes the medical-scientific criteria for linking fracture and death from fracture to specific types of service, including eligible war service, defence service, and peacetime service (section 4). Under this new instrument, various obligations and requirements are placed on parties, such as the necessity for certain factors to exist and be related to the specified service types to substantiate a claim that fracture or death from fracture is connected with the service circumstances (section 4). The instrument also details the process for determining claims for compensation under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), which requires reliance on Statements of Principles issued by the Authority (section 3). The Authority has laid out specific conditions and definitions necessary for making a claim, including the revised definition of 'fracture' and the introduction of new factors such as osteonecrosis and repetitive loading stress (section 6). Failure to comply with these provisions or misrepresentation in claims may lead to civil or criminal consequences. Under the VEA, penalties for knowingly making a false statement or claim can result in fines or imprisonment (section 120). Additionally, under the MRCA, penalties for fraudulent claims can include fines and imprisonment, as stipulated in section 319A. This instrument is crucial for veterans and service personnel seeking to claim compensation related to fractures or death from fractures, providing a clear framework for eligibility and the necessary medical evidence to support their claims. It also ensures that the Authority has considered the latest medical-scientific evidence in determining the link between service and these conditions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.