Statement of Principles concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2026)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2025L01624 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 3 OF 2026)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2026).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 42 of 2017 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2017L00883) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and death from femoroacetabular impingement syndrome can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2026).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting femoroacetabular impingement syndrome or death from femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 April 2025 concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • new definition in subsection 7(2) concerning application of Statement of Principle to 'femoroacetabular impingement syndrome';
  • revising the definition of 'femoroacetabular impingement syndrome' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning undertaking weight bearing and/or other exercises before clinical onset;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning undertaking weight bearing and/or other exercises before clinical worsening;
  • new definitions of ‘clinical onset’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of ‘MET’.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 April 2025, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

  1.              This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to femoroacetabular impingement syndrome as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 28 April 2025.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 3 of 2026

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have femoroacetabular impingement syndrome;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 42 of 2017; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2026) was enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument addresses the need for updated medical-scientific evidence concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, ensuring that it is considered in the context of claims for benefits and compensation by veterans and service personnel. The Authority repealed the previous Statement of Principles (Instrument No. 42 of 2017) and introduced this new statement to reflect the latest available evidence. The primary purpose of this instrument is to outline the minimum factors that must exist to raise a reasonable hypothesis connecting femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with specific types of military service, facilitating the assessment of claims under the VEA and MRCA. This update ensures that claims are assessed based on the most current medical-scientific understanding of the condition. The Authority determined this new Statement of Principles after conducting an investigation, as notified in the Government Notices Gazette on 28 April 2025. This process involved reviewing the latest medical-scientific evidence available, and no submissions were received during the consultation period. The Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2026) applies to claims made under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 by veterans and current or former Defence Force members who have developed femoroacetabular impingement syndrome as a result of their service. The principles outlined in this instrument are designed to assist both claimants and the respective Commissions in determining eligibility for compensation and medical treatment related to the condition. The instrument specifies the circumstances in which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting the syndrome with the service rendered, thereby facilitating the assessment and determination of benefits. This applies to various kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, and warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. The instrument also details the factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised, such as the clinical onset and progression of the syndrome in relation to the service. It replaces the previous Statement of Principles No. 42 of 2017, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. This legislation is designed to ensure that the determination of benefits is based on sound medical-scientific evidence, thus improving the quality of medico-scientific outcomes under the relevant Acts. The instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, ensuring that benefits are accessible without discrimination.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 3 of 2026) outlines the circumstances in which veterans and current or former Defence Force members can claim compensation or medical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This document specifies the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking the condition to particular types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence service, warlike, and non-warlike service (sections 5 and 9). The document also sets out definitions and factors related to the clinical onset and worsening of the condition (subsections 7(2), 7(3), 9(1) and 9(2)). The Statement of Principles imposes obligations on claimants to provide evidence that their condition meets the specified factors linking it to their service, and on the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission to assess claims based on the evidence provided and the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles. It also facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Breaching the requirements outlined in the Statement of Principles may have legal consequences, although the document does not specify any particular offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for non-compliance. However, failing to provide sufficient evidence to meet the factors specified in the Statement of Principles may result in a claim being denied, and an applicant may have the right to appeal such a decision. The Statement of Principles is compatible with human rights, as it does not derogate from any human rights and promotes several rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. It also ensures that these rights will be exercised without discrimination of any kind.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Rights & Protections

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.