Statement of Principles concerning female sexual dysfunction (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 43 of 2026)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2026L00463 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

FEMALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 43 OF 2026)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning female sexual dysfunction (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 43 of 2026).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 95 of 2016 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2016L01677) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning female sexual dysfunction.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that female sexual dysfunction and death from female sexual dysfunction can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning female sexual dysfunction (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 43 of 2026). This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting female sexual dysfunction or death from female sexual dysfunction, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 October 2024 concerning female sexual dysfunction in accordance with section 196G of the VEA. The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'female sexual dysfunction' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning genitourinary conditions;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning chronic renal failure;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning haematological or solid organ cancer;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning radiotherapy;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning endocrine disorders;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning neurological disorders;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning  a chronic medical condition;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(9) concerning having persistent pain;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(10) concerning BMI;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(11) concerning blunt or penetrating trauma;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(12) concerning menopause;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(13) concerning clinically significant disorders of mental health;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(14) concerning a category 1A stressor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(15) concerning experience as a child;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(16) concerning physical activity;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(17) concerning taking medication;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(20) concerning inability to obtain appropriate clinical management before clinical worsening only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having a concussion;
  • new factor in subsection 9(18) concerning intimate partner violence;
  • new factor in subsection 9(19) concerning category 2 stressor;
  • deleting factor concerning category 1B stressor;
  • new definition of category 2 stressor in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • new definition of ‘intimate partner’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • new definition of ‘intimate partner violence’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • new definition of ‘intimate relationship’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of ‘clinically significant disorder of mental health’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definition of ‘female orgasmic disorder’ to ‘female orgasmic dysfunction’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definition of ‘female sexual interest/arousal disorder’ to ‘female sexual interest/arousal dysfunction’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definition of ‘genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder’ to ‘genito-pelvic pain/penetration dysfunction’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definition of ‘severe, chronic medical condition’ in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • deleting the definition of ‘being obese’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘BMI’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘category 1B stressor’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘chronic renal failure’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘corpse’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘eyewitness’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘MET’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘persistent pain’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘severe childhood abuse’;
  • deleting the definition of ‘specified list of drugs’;
  • deleting the definition of specified list of ‘endocrine disorders’;
  • deleting the definition of specified list of ‘genitourinary conditions’; and
  • deleting the definition of specified list of ‘neurological disorders’.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to female sexual dysfunction in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 October 2024, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.
  2.              On 12 December 2025 the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factor relating to Category 1B Stressor. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority. No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to female sexual dysfunction as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 October 2024.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 43 of 2026

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: female sexual dysfunction

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have female sexual dysfunction;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting female sexual dysfunction with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 95 of 2016; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning female sexual dysfunction which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Female Sexual Dysfunction (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 43 of 2026) is an instrument determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It was introduced to address the problem of establishing a connection between female sexual dysfunction and service rendered by veterans and Defence Force members. The Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must exist, and must be related to specific types of service, for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised that the dysfunction is linked to the service. This instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles concerning female sexual dysfunction, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence and aims to facilitate claims and reviews under the VEA and MRCA while promoting human rights, including the right to social security and health. The Repatriation Medical Authority conducted an investigation, advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 October 2024, and provided an opportunity for consultation, although no submissions were received. The instrument is compatible with human rights, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and their dependents.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Female Sexual Dysfunction (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 43 of 2026) applies to veterans, current and former members of the Defence Force, and other eligible persons who have experienced female sexual dysfunction as a result of specific types of service. The types of service covered under this Act include operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The Act outlines the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the female sexual dysfunction to the service rendered. The Statement of Principles has been developed based on sound medical-scientific evidence and replaces the repealed Instrument No. 95 of 2016. The Act has a Commonwealth jurisdictional reach, applying across Australia, and is compatible with human rights as it promotes and does not derogate from various rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. The Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, but no changes were made to the proposed Instrument following consultation with relevant organisations.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning Female Sexual Dysfunction (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 43 of 2026) primarily serves to outline the factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting female sexual dysfunction to specific kinds of service rendered by a person. The factors are detailed in section 9 and include various medical and service-related conditions that, when related to the service, may support a claim of connection between the service and the condition. The legislation repeals Instrument No. 95 of 2016 and updates the sound medical-scientific evidence related to the condition. The Act imposes certain obligations and requirements on the parties involved. Claimants must provide evidence that the factors outlined in section 9 of the Statement of Principles exist and are related to the service rendered. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission are required to assess claims based on the evidence provided and the criteria set out in the Statement of Principles. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are tasked with reviewing decisions made by these commissions, ensuring that the process is fair and transparent. Breach of the provisions outlined in the Statement of Principles or any associated legislation may result in civil or criminal consequences. Although specific penalties are not detailed in the text, breaches of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 can lead to legal action. The severity of the consequences would depend on the nature and extent of the breach, potentially including fines, imprisonment, or other penalties as prescribed by the relevant Acts. The Statement of Principles also asserts compatibility with human rights, promoting rights such as the right to social security, adequate standard of living, and highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. It ensures that these rights are exercised without discrimination, thereby supporting the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Compliance Obligations
Exemptions & Exclusions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.