Statement of Principles concerning epileptic seizure No. 77 of 2013

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2013L01897 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 77 of 2013

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 47 of 2005, as amended by Instrument No. 37 of 2009, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning epileptic seizure.
  2. The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that epileptic seizure and death from epileptic seizure can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 77 of 2013 concerning epileptic seizure.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statements of Principles.
  3. The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.
  4. The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting epileptic seizure or death from epileptic seizure, with the circumstances of that service.

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 18 May 2011 concerning epileptic seizure in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instruments.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

  • new definition of 'epileptic seizure' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury';
  • revising factor 6(b) concerning 'concussion';
  • new factor 6(c) concerning 'a surgical procedure which involves a craniotomy';
  • revising factor 6(d) concerning 'a cerebrovascular accident or subarachnoid haemorrhage';
  • revising factor 6(e) concerning 'an hypoxic cerebral insult';
  • new factor 6(g) concerning 'an autoimmune disorder affecting the brain';
  • revising factor 6(h) concerning 'carbon monoxide poisoning';
  • revising factor 6(i) concerning 'an intracranial space-occupying lesion';
  • revising factor 6(j) concerning 'an infection of the brain or meninges';
  • revising factor 6(k) concerning 'human immunodeficiency virus';
  • revising factor 6(l) concerning 'using a drug from Specified List 1';
  • new factor 6(m) concerning 'dementia';
  • new factor 6(n) concerning 'a specified physical stimulus';
  • revising factor 6(o) concerning 'alcohol';
  • revising factor 6(t) concerning 'acute renal failure' or 'chronic renal disease requiring renal transplantation or dialysis';
  • revising factor 6(u) concerning 'renal dialysis';
  • revising factor 6(v) concerning 'a solid organ or stem cell transplantation';
  • revising factor 6(w) concerning 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs';
  • new factor 6(x) concerning 'taking a drug';
  • new factor 6(aa) concerning 'a medical condition from the specified list affecting the brain';
  • new factor 6(dd) concerning 'a neurotoxic substance, or a food or compound containing a neurotoxic substance';
  • new factor 6(ee) concerning 'a specified metal';
  • new factor 6 (ff) concerning 'animal envenomation';
  • deleting factors concerning 'Alzheimer's disease' and 'Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease', as they are now covered by factor 6(m) concerning 'dementia';
  • deleting a factor concerning 'reflex epilepsy' which is now covered by the Statements of Principles concerning epilepsy;
  • deleting a factor concerning 'multiple sclerosis' as it is now covered by factor 6(aa) concerning 'a medical condition from the specified list affecting the brain';
  • deleting factors concerning 'organochlorine insecticide' and 'RDX' as they are now covered by factor 6(dd) concerning 'a neurotoxic substance, or a food or compound containing a neurotoxic substance';
  • deleting a factor concerning 'being stung by a scorpion' as it is now covered by factor 6 (ff) concerning 'animal envenomation';
  • deleting a factor concerning 'having not slept within the forty-eight hours' as it is now covered by factor 6(n) concerning 'a physical stimulus';
  • new definitions of 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from the specified list', 'a medical condition from the specified list', 'a moderate to severe alcohol use disorder', 'a neurotoxic substance or a food or compound containing a neurotoxic substance', 'a specified metal', 'a specified physical stimulus', 'alcohol intoxication', 'an autoimmune disorder affecting the brain', 'an hypoxic cerebral insult', 'an inhalant', 'alcohol', 'dementia', 'signs and symptoms of poisoning' and 'sleep deprivation' in clause 9;
  • revising the definitions of 'a drug from Specified List 1', 'acute renal failure', 'an infection of the brain or meninges', 'an intracranial space-occupying lesion' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting the definitions of 'a class of drug from Specified List 2', 'a mild head injury', 'cerebral trauma', 'chronic renal failure' and 'reflex epilepsy' in clause 9; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to epileptic seizure in the Government Notices Gazette of 18 May 2011, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to epileptic seizure as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 18 May 2011.

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 77 of 2013

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Epileptic seizure

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have epileptic seizure;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting epileptic seizure with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 4 of the Explanatory Notes;
  • replaces Instrument No. 47 of 2005, as amended by Instrument No. 37 of 2009; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning epileptic seizure which have occurred since these earlier instruments were determined.

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members; and
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 77 of 2013 was enacted under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 to address the issue of epileptic seizures and deaths related to military service. This instrument revokes the previous Instrument No. 47 of 2005, as amended by Instrument No. 37 of 2009, and replaces it with a new Statement of Principles that incorporates the latest sound medical-scientific evidence. The Authority determined this instrument to facilitate claims for compensation and medical treatment for veterans and Defence Force members who suffer from epileptic seizures due to their service. The new Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must exist to establish a connection between epileptic seizures and the service rendered, covering various types of service and medical conditions. This legislative instrument was developed following an investigation into epileptic seizure, which was advertised in the Government Notices Gazette on 18 May 2011, and no submissions were received during the investigation. The instrument is compatible with human rights, as it promotes the rights of veterans, Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 77 of 2013, concerning epileptic seizure, applies to veterans and current or former Defence Force members who have rendered various types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This instrument replaces the previously revoked Instruments No. 47 of 2005, as amended by Instrument No. 37 of 2009. It sets out the minimum factors that must exist to raise a reasonable hypothesis connecting epileptic seizure or death from epileptic seizure with the service circumstances, and these factors must be related to the specific kinds of service rendered by the person. The instrument facilitates claimants in making and the Repatriation Commission in assessing claims under the VEA and the MRCA, respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have epileptic seizure. It also outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting epileptic seizure with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person. This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, and promotes a number of human rights, including the right to social security, the right to an adequate standard of living, the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, and the rights of persons with disabilities.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) has revoked Instrument No. 47 of 2005, as amended by Instrument No. 37 of 2009, concerning epileptic seizure. This revocation is due to the RMA's determination of a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 77 of 2013, concerning epileptic seizure. This new instrument replaces the previous ones and reflects updated medical-scientific evidence regarding the connection between epileptic seizure and certain kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike services. The new Statement of Principles outlines the factors that must exist, at a minimum, to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking epileptic seizure or death from epileptic seizure with the service circumstances. The Act imposes several obligations and requirements on the parties it governs. It mandates the RMA to determine Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence, ensuring that these principles accurately reflect the current understanding of the conditions in question. Claimants seeking compensation for epileptic seizures must provide evidence that connects their condition to the service rendered, in line with the factors specified in the Statement of Principles. The Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission is responsible for determining claims under section 319 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) by referring to the Statements of Principles issued by the RMA. Furthermore, the Authority must ensure that these instruments are compatible with human rights as recognized in international instruments, promoting the rights of veterans and their dependents. Any breaches of the provisions in this legislation can lead to civil or criminal consequences. While specific penalties are not detailed in the explanatory notes, violations of the requirements to provide accurate evidence or misrepresenting service-related conditions can result in legal action. This could potentially lead to fines or other penalties as stipulated by relevant laws. The overarching aim is to ensure that claimants receive fair and accurate assessments of their entitlements based on sound medical-scientific evidence, thereby protecting the integrity of the compensation process. The legislation, through its technical improvements and updated medical-scientific evidence, ensures that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. This not only facilitates the assessment and determination of social security benefits but also upholds the rights to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. By doing so, it supports the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, ensuring they receive appropriate compensation and care.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.