Statement of Principles concerning eating disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 15 of 2025)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2024L01709 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

EATING DISORDER

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 15 OF 2025)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning eating disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 15 of 2025).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 13 of 2016 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2016L00261) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning eating disorder.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that eating disorder and death from eating disorder can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning eating disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 15 of 2025).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting eating disorder or death from eating disorder, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023 concerning eating disorder in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'eating disorder' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising ICD-10-AM codes for 'eating disorder' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning experiencing a category 1A stressor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning experiencing a category 1B stressor;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning experiencing a category 2 stressor;
  • new factor in subsection 9(4) concerning being the subject of bullying;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning experiencing the death of an important or influential person;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning having one of the following clinically significant disorder of mental health;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning having experienced as a child (under the age of 18) one of the following;
  • new factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having experiencing as a child (under the age of 18) sexual abuse;
  • new factor in subsection 9(9) concerning experiencing regular food insecurity;
  • new factor in subsection 9(10) concerning having type 1 diabetes mellitus;
  • deleting (f) having a family member or significant other experience a major deterioration in their health and (g) being a full-time caregiver to a family member or significant other with a severe physical, mental or developmental disability from category 2 stressor;
  • deleting agoraphobia, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia from clinically-significant disorder of mental health;
  • deleting factors concerning having a medical illness or injury which is life-threatening;
  • deleting factor concerning being treated with the drug topiramate;
  • new definitions of 'bullying', 'DSM-5-TR', 'food insecurity' and 'witness' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'category 1A stressor', 'category 2 stressor' and 'clinically significant disorder of mental health' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of ' anorexia nervosa', 'binge-eating disorder', 'bulimia nervosa', 'DSM-5', 'eyewitness', 'other specified feeding or eating disorder and unspecified feeding or eating disorder', 'severe childhood abuse' and 'significant other'.

Incorporation

  1.              This Instrument incorporates by reference the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5-TR), Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 2022.  A copy of this document is available from the offices of the Repatriation Medical Authority, Level 8, 480 Queen St, Brisbane, Queensland 4000, by contacting the Registrar on telephone (07) 3815 9404.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to eating disorder in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.
  2.          On 27 September 2024, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to:
  • 9(3) & 9(11) deleting (f) having a family member or significant other experience a major deterioration in their health and (g) being a full-time caregiver to a family member or significant other with a severe physical, mental or developmental disability from definition of category 2 stressor;
  • 9(5) & 9(13) deleting agoraphobia, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia from definition of clinically-significant disorder of mental health;
  • 9(6) & 9(14) having a medical illness or injury which is life-threatening;
  • 9(8) & 9(15) being treated with the drug topiramate;

The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to eating disorder as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 15 of 2025

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Eating disorder

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have eating disorder;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting eating disorder with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 13 of 2016; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning eating disorder which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning eating disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 15 of 2025) was enacted to address the gap in existing legislation regarding the recognition and compensation of eating disorders in veterans and Defence Force members. The Repatriation Medical Authority, pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, determined this Statement of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence that links eating disorders to specific types of service. This legislative instrument aims to facilitate the assessment and processing of claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 by outlining the minimum factors that must be present to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting eating disorders with the service rendered. It replaces the previous Statement of Principles No. 13 of 2016 and reflects the most recent medical-scientific evidence available. The Statement of Principles sets out the circumstances under which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible individuals who have developed eating disorders, ensuring that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent. This legislative instrument promotes various human rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning eating disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 15 of 2025), issued under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), applies to veterans and current or former Defence Force members who are eligible under these Acts. It outlines the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting eating disorders or death from eating disorders with specific types of service rendered, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. This Statement of Principles is designed to guide claimants and the relevant Commissions in the assessment and determination of claims for medical treatment and compensation. The instrument replaces a previous Statement of Principles, incorporating updated sound medical-scientific evidence and modifying definitions and criteria to better reflect current understandings of eating disorders. The legislative instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights of veterans and their dependents by ensuring that the conditions for benefit are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thus facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits and healthcare rights.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning eating disorder (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 15 of 2025) outlines the circumstances under which a reasonable hypothesis may be raised that an eating disorder is connected to service rendered by a person under specified conditions. This includes operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) (sections 2 and 5). These provisions apply to both the VEA and the MRCA, providing a framework for determining claims related to eating disorders. The determination is based on the sound medical-scientific evidence available to the Repatriation Medical Authority, which has been reviewed and updated to reflect new findings. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties and entities it governs. Claimants must provide sufficient evidence linking their eating disorder to their service under the specified conditions. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission are required to assess these claims based on the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal also have the responsibility to review decisions made by these Commissions, ensuring that the process is fair and that the evidence aligns with the principles set forth in the legislation. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Statement of Principles or any subsequent determinations can lead to various consequences. While the Act does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for non-compliance, it implies that improper claims or misrepresentations could result in the denial of benefits or compensation. The Act emphasises the importance of accurate and truthful information in the claims process to ensure that only eligible individuals receive the benefits they are entitled to. The seriousness of the consequences, however, depends on the context and the discretion of the relevant authorities in assessing and reviewing claims.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Explanatory Statement
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Human Rights Implications

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.