Statement of Principles concerning dislocation No. 24 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L01040 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 24 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 290 of 1995 determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning dislocation.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that dislocation and death from dislocation can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 24 of 2010 concerning dislocation.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting dislocation or death from dislocation, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007 concerning dislocation in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'dislocation' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'physical trauma';
  • revising factor 6(b) concerning 'a disease process affecting the normal structural or functional relationship between the articulating surfaces of the affected joint';
  • new factor 6(c) concerning 'damage to a soft tissue structure as specified';
  • new factor 6(d) concerning 'laxity of the joint capsule or a stabilising ligament';
  • new factor 6(e) concerning 'fracture, avulsion or bony defect';
  • new factor 6(f) concerning 'biomechanical abnormality';
  • new factor 6(g)(i) concerning 'an inflammatory or infectious condition involving the ear, nose or throat';
  • new factor 6(g)(ii) concerning 'a surgical procedure involving the head or neck';
  • new factor 6(h)(i) concerning 'tracheal intubation';
  • new factor 6(h)(ii) concerning 'intravenous sedation';
  • new factor 6(h)(iii) concerning 'an activity that involves wide opening of the mouth';
  • deleting worsening factor concerning 'physical trauma';
  • deleting worsening factor concerning 'a disease process affecting the normal structural or functional relationship between the articulating surfaces of the affected joint';
  • new definitions of 'a biomechanical abnormality involving the affected joint', 'a soft tissue structure as specified', 'an activity that involves wide opening of the mouth', 'death from dislocation', 'ICD-10-AM code', 'neuropathic arthropathy', 'relevant service' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'a disease process affecting the normal structural or functional relationship between the articulating surfaces of the affected joint' and 'physical trauma to the affected joint' in clause 9;
  • deleting definition of 'ICD code'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to dislocation in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             On 16 February 2010, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority. This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to 'suffering physical trauma' and 'suffering a disease process'. The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed instrument prior to its determination. No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.

 

10.         The determining of this new instrument finalises the investigation in relation to dislocation as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 2 May 2007.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 24 of 2010 is an instrument enacted under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The instrument was introduced to address the medical-scientific evidence linking dislocation and death from dislocation to particular kinds of military service. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), established under the VEA, revoked Instrument No. 290 of 1995 concerning dislocation and replaced it with this new instrument following an investigation. The new instrument, which sets out the minimum factors required to establish a connection between dislocation or death from dislocation and the service circumstances, aims to ensure that compensation claims are assessed in light of the most current medical-scientific evidence. The Authority invited submissions from relevant organisations and experts during the investigation but did not receive any. The instrument clarifies the format and definitions to accommodate the commencement of the MRCA and specifies that the Statement of Principles applies to both the VEA and the MRCA.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority (RMA) has issued Instrument No. 24 of 2010 concerning dislocation, replacing Instrument No. 290 of 1995, under the authority of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This instrument applies to persons who have sustained a dislocation or death from dislocation during specific types of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service. The instrument sets out the minimum factors that must exist to establish a connection between the service and the condition, thereby qualifying the individual for compensation under the relevant acts. The application of this instrument extends to claims for injuries, diseases, or deaths occurring on or after 1 July 2004, as these are now governed by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The instrument specifies the latest medical-scientific evidence and incorporates several revisions and new definitions to better reflect current medical understanding and terminology. The RMA is responsible for determining Statements of Principles that guide the assessment of claims, and this instrument finalises the investigation into dislocation that was announced in the Government Notices Gazette on 2 May 2007. The instrument is applicable nationally, and any references related to the condition can be requested from the RMA.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 24 of 2010 concern the revocation of a previous Statement of Principles (Instrument No. 290 of 1995) regarding dislocation and the introduction of a new Statement of Principles concerning dislocation (subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, or VEA). This new instrument replaces the previous one and outlines the medical-scientific evidence related to dislocation and death from dislocation in relation to specific types of military service (paragraphs 2 and 3). The instrument is effective for both the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) (paragraph 7). The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, it requires the Repatriation Medical Authority to determine Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence, which must be made available to relevant organisations and individuals (paragraphs 4 and 5). Secondly, it mandates that claims for compensation for injuries or diseases related to military service be assessed by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in accordance with the new Statement of Principles (subsection 196B(2) of the VEA). Lastly, the Authority must advertise its intention to investigate and gather submissions from relevant parties before determining any new instrument (paragraphs 8 and 9). The consequences for breach of the Act are not explicitly stated in the explanatory notes. However, given the nature of the legislation and its focus on compensation claims, it is reasonable to assume that any breaches could lead to civil or administrative penalties, such as fines or the withholding of compensation payments. The maximum penalties for such breaches would depend on the specific nature of the breach and the applicable laws governing the enforcement of the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Affairs
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.