Statement of Principles concerning discoid lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 49 of 2025)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2025L00504 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

DISCOID LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 49 OF 2025)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1.              This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning discoid lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 49 of 2025).

Background

  1.              The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 126 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2015L01680) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning discoid lupus erythematosus.
  2.              The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that discoid lupus erythematosus and death from discoid lupus erythematosus can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning discoid lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 49 of 2025).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

  1.              The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).
  2.              The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting discoid lupus erythematosus or death from discoid lupus erythematosus, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

  1.              This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023 concerning discoid lupus erythematosus in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.
  2.              The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'discoid lupus erythematosus' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning taking any of the following medications;
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning taking a medication which is associated with;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning taking estradiol menopausal hormone therapy;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning smoking;
  • new factor in subsection 9(6) concerning having posttraumatic stress disorder;
  • deleting factors concerning having an injury to the skin at the affected site;
  • new definition of 'one pack-year' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'injury to the skin', 'pack-year of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products' and 'specified list of classes of drugs'.

Consultation

  1.              Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to discoid lupus erythematosus in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.
  2.              On 3 February 2025, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factors relating to having an injury to the skin at the affected site.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

  1.          This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

 

Finalisation of Investigation

  1.          The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to discoid lupus erythematosus as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 November 2023.

References

  1.          A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 49 of 2025

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Discoid lupus erythematosus

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have discoid lupus erythematosus;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting discoid lupus erythematosus with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 126 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning discoid lupus erythematosus which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Discoid Lupus Erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 49 of 2025) was enacted in 2025 by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument addresses the problem of determining the connection between discoid lupus erythematosus and military service, thereby ensuring that veterans and service personnel can receive appropriate medical treatment and compensation. The Authority determined this Statement of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence, replacing the previous Statement of Principles No. 126 of 2015. The policy objective is to facilitate claims under the VEA and MRCA by clearly outlining the factors necessary to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking the disease to particular kinds of service. This instrument ensures that the qualifying conditions for benefits are reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents. It aids in the assessment and determination of social security benefits, supports the right to an adequate standard of living, and facilitates the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits related to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning discoid lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 49 of 2025) applies to claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) for veterans and current or former Defence Force members who have developed discoid lupus erythematosus. It applies to the kinds of service including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service. The instrument specifies the minimum factors that must exist and be related to the relevant service to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the disease with service. It sets out the sound medical-scientific evidence considered by the Repatriation Medical Authority in determining the factors. The instrument does not apply to other diseases or conditions not specified within it. Its application can be extended or modified through subordinate instruments, which may introduce additional factors or modify existing ones based on evolving medical-scientific evidence. The instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting the rights to social security, an adequate standard of living, and health for eligible veterans and Defence Force members. The instrument's scope is national, as it applies to veterans and Defence Force members across Australia, and it is determined under the VEA and MRCA, which have federal jurisdiction. It replaces the previous instrument (No. 126 of 2015) and incorporates changes reflecting new medical-scientific evidence. The instrument is a technical measure aimed at ensuring that claims are assessed based on the most current and reliable evidence, thereby improving the quality of medico-scientific outcomes for claimants. The Authority consulted with relevant organisations but did not receive submissions, and no changes were made to the proposed instrument following consultation.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statement of Principles concerning discoid lupus erythematosus (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 49 of 2025) are sections 1 through 10, which detail the specific factors and circumstances required to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting discoid lupus erythematosus or death from discoid lupus erythematosus with the service rendered by a person. This Statement of Principles outlines the minimum factors that must be present and related to particular kinds of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service, before a claim can be considered valid under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. The sections detail the medical and service-related factors that must be satisfied, including definitions, specific conditions, and the relationship between the service and the condition. The Statement of Principles imposes obligations on claimants, the Repatriation Commission, and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission to ensure that claims are assessed fairly and in accordance with the sound medical-scientific evidence provided. Claimants must provide evidence that meets the criteria outlined in the Statement of Principles to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting their condition with their service. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must use this Statement to assess the validity of claims, ensuring that all relevant factors are considered. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are also required to review decisions made under this Statement of Principles. The Statement of Principles does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil or criminal consequences for breach. However, any failure to comply with the requirements set out in this Statement could potentially result in the denial of claims for compensation and medical treatment under the relevant Acts. The determination of this Statement of Principles is based on sound medical-scientific evidence, and any breach of its provisions by claimants or the authorities could lead to the invalidation of claims, thereby denying eligible individuals their rightful entitlements. The focus of the Statement is on ensuring that claims are assessed based on accurate and up-to-date medical evidence, rather than on imposing punitive measures for non-compliance.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Licensing & Registration
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Catchwords
Human Rights Implications

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.