Statement of Principles concerning dengue virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 78 of 2020)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2020L01379 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

DENGUE VIRUS INFECTION

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 78 OF 2020)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning dengue virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 78 of 2020).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 13 of 2012 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2012L00443) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning dengue fever.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that dengue virus infection and death from dengue virus infection can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning dengue virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 78 of 2020).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting dengue virus infection or death from dengue virus infection, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019 concerning dengue fever in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the name of the condition from 'dengue fever' to 'dengue virus infection';
  • new definition of 'dengue virus infection' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning being exposed to dengue virus, for clinical onset only, by the inclusion of a note;
  • deleting the factor concerning having a previous episode of dengue infection, involving a virus type different to the type responsible for the current episode, for dengue haemorrhagic fever only. The previous factor was a risk factor for severity of the disease, rather than a factor for clinical onset of the disease. This factor has been subsumed by the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning being exposed to dengue virus, for clinical onset only. This exposure factor covers the causes of all forms of dengue virus infection, including dengue haemorrhagic fever;
  • new definitions of 'MRCA' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • revising the definitions of 'being exposed to dengue virus' and 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary.

 

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to dengue fever in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to dengue fever as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 7 May 2019.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority’s website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

  Email:    info@rma.gov.au

  Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 78 of 2020

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Dengue virus infection

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have dengue virus infection;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting dengue virus infection with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 13 of 2012; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning dengue virus infection which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning dengue virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 78 of 2020) was introduced to address the need for updated medical-scientific evidence concerning dengue virus infection and its connection to certain kinds of service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. This Statement of Principles, determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 13 of 2012. The primary objective of this instrument is to facilitate the claims process for veterans and current or former Defence Force members who may have contracted dengue virus infection during their service by specifying the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the infection with their service. The instrument aims to ensure that claimants and the relevant Commissions have clear guidance based on the latest medical-scientific evidence, thereby promoting equitable and transparent outcomes. In line with the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, this Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised in international instruments. It promotes the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits, compensation, and medical treatment related to dengue virus infection. This includes ensuring the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, all without discrimination. The instrument thereby upholds and supports the human rights of affected individuals by providing a clear, evidence-based framework for assessing their claims.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning dengue virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 78 of 2020) applies to veterans and current or former Defence Force members who have contracted dengue virus infection or died from the condition, and who seek to make claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It outlines the factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the infection or death with particular kinds of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service, as well as warlike and non-warlike service. The Statement of Principles has national jurisdictional reach and will replace the previously repealed Instrument No. 13 of 2012. It is determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority, which is tasked with assessing the sound medical-scientific evidence relating to the connection between dengue virus infection and military service. The Instrument does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds for eligibility, but rather sets out the minimum factors that must be present to establish the connection. The Instrument may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments as necessary.

Key Provisions

The main sections of the Statement of Principles concerning dengue virus infection (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 78 of 2020) outline the determination of the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) regarding the connection between dengue virus infection and service under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This Instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles concerning dengue fever (Instrument No. 13 of 2012) and specifies the factors necessary to establish a reasonable hypothesis linking dengue virus infection to particular kinds of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA (section 5). The Instrument is formatted to adopt the latest revised format, specifies a commencement date, and revises the terminology from 'dengue fever' to 'dengue virus infection' (section 7). It also incorporates updated medical-scientific evidence and definitions, such as 'being exposed to dengue virus' and'relevant service' (Schedule 1 - Dictionary). The obligations imposed by this Act on parties include ensuring that claims under the VEA and MRCA are assessed with reference to the specified factors that link dengue virus infection to relevant service. Claimants must demonstrate exposure to dengue virus during the relevant service period, and the Authority must assess the claims based on the sound medical-scientific evidence provided in the Statement of Principles (section 5). The Act also requires that the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission evaluate claims using these specified factors. Additionally, the Authority must ensure that the assessment and determination processes are transparent, reasonable, and proportionate, thereby promoting the human rights of veterans and service personnel (section 9). Breaches of the provisions outlined in this Instrument can lead to various consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the text, the Act’s focus on ensuring sound medical-scientific evidence for claims implies that any misrepresentation or failure to provide necessary evidence could result in the denial of claims. Furthermore, the compatibility with human rights suggests that any discriminatory practices in the assessment process could lead to legal challenges. The maximum penalties for such breaches are not explicitly stated, but they would typically align with the provisions of the VEA and MRCA, which might include financial penalties, revocation of benefits, or other administrative actions deemed appropriate by the relevant authorities.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Explanatory Statement
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Human Rights Law

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.