Statement of Principles concerning dementia pugilistica No. 11 of 2012

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2012L00018 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 11 of 2012

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 7 of 2000, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning dementia pugilistica.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that dementia pugilistica and death from dementia pugilistica can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 11 of 2012 concerning dementia pugilistica.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting dementia pugilistica or death from dementia pugilistica, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 June 2010 concerning dementia pugilistica in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'dementia pugilistica' in clause 3;
  • revising factor 6(a) concerning 'at least 250 blows to the head';
  • new factor 6(b) concerning 'blows to the head';
  • new definition of 'high impact contact activity' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'blows to the head' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definition of 'ICD-10-AM code'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to dementia pugilistica in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 June 2010, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny Act 2011).

 

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to dementia pugilistica as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 June 2010.


11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 11 of 2012 was enacted to address the issue of dementia pugilistica, a condition related to particular kinds of military service. This instrument was introduced to replace the previous Instrument No. 7 of 2000 concerning the same condition. It was determined under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and applies to the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The primary objective of this instrument is to outline the factors that must be present to establish a connection between dementia pugilistica or death from dementia pugilistica and specific types of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence service, warlike, and non-warlike service. This instrument finalises the investigation into dementia pugilistica that was initiated and notified in the Government Notices Gazette of 30 June 2010.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986, has revoked Instrument No. 7 of 2000 and introduced Instrument No. 11 of 2012 concerning dementia pugilistica, reflecting the latest medical-scientific evidence. This Instrument applies to various types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service, establishing the minimum factors necessary to connect dementia pugilistica or death from it with the circumstances of the service. Claims for compensation for injuries sustained, diseases contracted, or deaths occurring on or after 1 July 2004 are assessed by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, with the new Instrument guiding their determination. The Instrument has been designed to be compatible with human rights and freedoms as recognised or declared in the relevant international instruments, ensuring its adherence to broader legal and ethical standards.

Key Provisions

The main sections of this instrument, including the Statement of Principles, outline the specific conditions and factors that must exist for dementia pugilistica, or death from dementia pugilistica, to be considered related to a person's service (sections 4 and 5). This includes detailing the types of service that must have been rendered, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence service, warlike, or non-warlike service (section 4). Additionally, the instrument specifies the medical-scientific evidence that must be present to support a claim, such as the number and nature of blows to the head, and the involvement in high-impact contact activities (section 6). The obligations imposed by this Act on the parties it governs include ensuring that claims for compensation related to dementia pugilistica are supported by sufficient medical-scientific evidence, and that these claims are made in accordance with the conditions set out in the Statement of Principles (sections 4, 5, and 6). Claimants must demonstrate that their service involved the specified types of activities and that they were exposed to the relevant factors that could have led to the development of dementia pugilistica. Additionally, the Repatriation Medical Authority is responsible for determining the validity of these claims based on the evidence provided and the criteria outlined in the Statement of Principles. There are no specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach detailed within this instrument. However, the failure to comply with the requirements for making a claim, including the submission of adequate evidence and adherence to the conditions set out in the Statement of Principles, could result in the rejection of the claim. This could lead to the denial of compensation or benefits that the claimant may be entitled to under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. Additionally, providing false or misleading information in a claim could potentially lead to legal consequences under general criminal law provisions for fraud or deceit.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards
Catchwords
Statements of Principles

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.