Statement of Principles concerning conjunctivitis No. 2 of 2012

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2012L00006 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 2 of 2012

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 112 of 1996, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning conjunctivitis.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that conjunctivitis and death from conjunctivitis can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 2 of 2012 concerning conjunctivitis.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence (other than hazardous service and British nuclear test defence service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, conjunctivitis or death from conjunctivitis is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008 concerning conjunctivitis in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the revoked Instrument, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • revising the definition of 'conjunctivitis' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(m) concerning 'blepharitis';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(n) concerning 'infection of the conjunctiva';
  • revising factors 6(c) & 6(o) concerning 'a condition of the affected eye';
  • revising factors 6(d) & 6(p) concerning 'ocular or periocular exposure to an allergen';
  • revising factors 6(e) & 6(q) concerning 'a condition from the specified list';
  • revising factors 6(f) & 6(r) concerning 'therapy to the affected eye with topically applied medication' for iatrogenic conjunctivitis only;
  • revising factors 6(g) & 6(s) concerning 'ocular or periocular exposure to an irritant substance';
  • revising factors 6(h) & 6(t) concerning 'mustard gas exposure';
  • revising factors 6(i) & 6(u) concerning 'a foreign body';
  • revising factors 6(j) & 6(v) concerning 'an injury to the conjunctiva';
  • revising factors 6(k) & 6(w) concerning 'a benign or malignant neoplasm';
  • new factor 6(l) concerning 'being in an immunosuppressed state' for clinical onset;
  • revising factor 6(x) concerning 'being in an immunosuppressed state' for clinical worsening;
  • deleting factors concerning 'acute blepharitis' and 'chronic blepharitis', as they are now covered by factors 6(a) & 6(m);
  • deleting factors concerning 'bacterial infection', 'chlamydial infection', 'viral infection', 'Rickettsial infection', 'fungal infection' and 'parasitic infection', as they are now covered by factors 6(b) & 6(n);
  • deleting factors concerning 'xerosis conjunctivae', as they are now covered by factors 6(c) & 6(o);
  • deleting factors concerning 'a hypersensitivity reaction', as they are now covered by factors 6(d) & 6(p);
  • deleting factors concerning 'an autoimmune disease', 'psoriasis' and 'dermatitis herpetiformis', as they are now covered by factors 6(e) & 6(q);
  • deleting factors concerning 'external burn', as they are now covered by factors 6(j) & 6(v);
  • new definitions of 'a condition from the specified list', 'a condition of the affected eye from the specified list', 'an allergen', 'an infection of the conjunctiva', 'an injury to the conjunctiva', 'an irritant substance', 'being in an immunosuppressed state', 'death from conjunctivitis', 'ICD-10-AM code' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'iatrogenic conjunctivitis' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'acute blepharitis', 'autoimmune disease', 'bacterial conjunctivitis', 'chlamydial conjunctivitis', 'chronic blepharitis', 'dermatitis herpetiformis', 'external burn of the affected eye', 'foreign body on the affected eye', 'fungal conjunctivitis', 'hypersensitivity reaction', 'ICD code', 'immuno-compromised state', 'immunologic conjunctivitis', 'injury of the conjunctiva', 'irritant conjunctivitis', 'parasitic conjunctivitis', 'psoriasis', 'Rickettsial infection', 'viral infection' and 'xerosis conjunctivae'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to conjunctivitis in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny Act 2011).

 

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to conjunctivitis as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008.

 

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 2 of 2012 was introduced to address the issue of conjunctivitis, particularly its relation to service, under the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). Enacted by the Repatriation Medical Authority, the Instrument replaces the previous Instrument No. 112 of 1996, which also dealt with conjunctivitis. The Authority's determination is based on sound medical-scientific evidence indicating a probable connection between conjunctivitis, death from conjunctivitis, and particular kinds of service. This new Statement of Principles aims to provide clarity and updated definitions for various medical conditions and factors related to conjunctivitis, ensuring consistency with the latest medical understanding. The Instrument also aligns with the commencement of the MRCA, facilitating claims for compensation for conditions contracted or sustained on or after 1 July 2004.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 2 of 2012 under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) establishes a Statement of Principles concerning conjunctivitis, which replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 112 of 1996. This legislation applies to veterans and current or former members of the Australian Defence Force who may be suffering from or have died from conjunctivitis, linking it to specific kinds of service as outlined in the VEA and MRCA. The Instrument is applicable nationally, covering all veterans and Defence personnel across Australia, regardless of state or territory boundaries. The primary exclusion pertains to those whose conjunctivitis does not meet the criteria set out in the new Statement of Principles, which specifies the factors and conditions that must exist for a connection to be established between the service rendered and the conjunctivitis or death from conjunctivitis. The Instrument also clarifies that the Repatriation Medical Authority determines these Statements of Principles for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA, ensuring consistent application across the relevant acts.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority, pursuant to subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), has revoked Instrument No. 112 of 1996 concerning conjunctivitis and has issued a new Instrument No. 2 of 2012 (Instrument). This new Instrument outlines the Statement of Principles for the connection between conjunctivitis or death from conjunctivitis and particular kinds of military service. The Authority has made this determination based on the available sound medical-scientific evidence, indicating that it is more probable than not that such conditions can be related to certain types of service. The new Instrument lists specific factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service, before it can be said that conjunctivitis or death from conjunctivitis is connected with the circumstances of that service. These factors encompass various conditions and exposures that could lead to conjunctivitis, such as infections, allergens, irritants, and other medical states. Additionally, the Instrument includes revised definitions and clarifications of terms related to the condition and the service, which aim to provide a clearer and more comprehensive understanding of the circumstances under which conjunctivitis may be considered service-related. Under the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), claims for compensation for service injuries, diseases, or deaths on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission. The Commission uses the Statements of Principles issued by the Authority to decide on claims made under section 319 of the MRCA. The new Instrument therefore plays a crucial role in these determinations by providing the necessary medical and service-related criteria for linking conjunctivitis to military service. The Authority has outlined specific offences and penalties for breaches of the provisions within the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. While the Instrument itself does not detail specific penalties, breaches of these Acts can result in substantial civil or criminal consequences. For instance, providing false or misleading information in a claim for benefits or compensation can lead to fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. Additionally, any person found guilty of defrauding the Commonwealth in relation to veterans’ entitlements may face penalties that include fines of up to $21,000 and imprisonment for up to five years, as stipulated under the relevant sections of these Acts. These penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the legal requirements and truthful reporting in the context of veterans’ entitlements and compensation claims.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.