Statement of Principles concerning coeliac disease (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 30 of 2020)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2020L00498 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

COELIAC DISEASE

(BALANCE OF PROBABILITIES) (NO. 30 OF 2020)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning coeliac disease (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 30 of 2020).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 2 of 2011 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2010L03249) determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning coeliac disease.

3.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that coeliac disease and death from coeliac disease can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning coeliac disease (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 30 of 2020).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service and British nuclear test defence service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, coeliac disease or death from coeliac disease is connected with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 8 May 2018 concerning coeliac disease in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'coeliac disease' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning being treated with interferon alpha;
  • new factor in subsection 9(2) concerning being treated with a proton pump inhibitor or a histamine-2 receptor antagonist, for clinical worsening only;
  • deleting the factor concerning being pregnant;
  • new definitions of 'MRCA' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • revising the definition of 'relevant service' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to coeliac disease in the Government Notices Gazette of 8 May 2018, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 12 December 2019, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of the factor relating to being pregnant.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority regarding the proposed Instrument.  Following consideration of the submission, the Authority decided to retain the separate factor concerning an inability to maintain a gluten-free diet as an independent clinical worsening factor (subsection 9(3)).  Minor typographical changes were also made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to coeliac disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 8 May 2018.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 30 of 2020

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Coeliac disease

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have coeliac disease;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must exist before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, coeliac disease is connected with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 2 of 2011; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning coeliac disease which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning coeliac disease (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 30 of 2020) was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) to address the need for an updated assessment of the connection between coeliac disease and military service. This legislative instrument repeals Instrument No. 2 of 2011 and is based on the latest sound medical-scientific evidence, which indicates that coeliac disease and death from coeliac disease are more likely than not to be related to specific types of military service. The primary objective of this legislation is to provide a clear framework for assessing claims related to coeliac disease, ensuring that veterans and service personnel receive appropriate medical treatment and compensation. The Authority consulted with relevant organisations and individuals before finalising the instrument, ensuring its compatibility with human rights as recognised in international instruments. The Statement of Principles outlines the factors that must exist and be related to particular kinds of military service to establish a connection with coeliac disease or death from coeliac disease. It specifies the types of service under the VEA and MRCA that are considered eligible, thereby facilitating the assessment and review of claims by the Repatriation Commission, Veterans' Review Board, and Administrative Appeals Tribunal. The instrument also reflects advancements in medical-scientific evidence since the previous instrument was determined, enhancing the quality of outcomes under the VEA and MRCA. The legislative instrument promotes various human rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, ensuring that these rights are exercised without discrimination.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning coeliac disease (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 30 of 2020) applies to individuals who are eligible for benefits under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), specifically those who have coeliac disease or who died from coeliac disease and who rendered certain kinds of service. These kinds of service include eligible war service (other than operational service) and defence service (other than hazardous service and British nuclear test defence service) under the VEA, as well as peacetime service under the MRCA. The Act facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have coeliac disease, and it replaces Instrument No. 2 of 2011. The legislation is applicable nationally, as it is a Commonwealth instrument, and there are no stated exclusions or exemptions. The application of the Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which are instruments determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning coeliac disease (Balance of Probabilities) (No. 30 of 2020) primarily serves to detail the factors that must exist for it to be said that coeliac disease is connected with certain kinds of service, on the balance of probabilities. According to section 5 of the Explanatory Statement, these factors must be related to eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service as defined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislation replaces the previously repealed Instrument No. 2 of 2011 and aligns with the most recent sound medical-scientific evidence available. Entities governed by this Act, such as the Repatriation Medical Authority, the Repatriation Commission, and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, have specific obligations under this legislation. They are required to apply the Statement of Principles when determining claims for coeliac disease under the VEA and MRCA. These entities must ensure that their decisions are based on the factors outlined in the Statement of Principles, reflecting the latest medical-scientific evidence. Additionally, they must facilitate the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal as mentioned in section 2 of the Explanatory Statement. Breach of the provisions set forth in this Act can lead to significant consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the provided text, breaches generally result in invalid claims or denial of benefits. The legislation emphasises the importance of basing decisions on sound medical-scientific evidence, and any deviation from this requirement could lead to legal challenges or administrative reviews. The maximum penalties for such breaches are not explicitly stated but typically involve the invalidation of claims and potential financial repercussions for claimants who are found to have misrepresented their conditions or service history.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Consultation Requirements
Offence Provisions
Catchwords
Compatibility with Human Rights

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.