Statement of Principles concerning chronic pruritus ani No. 76 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L02315 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 76 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 42 of 1996, determined under subsection 196B(3) of the VEA concerning pruritus ani.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that on the sound medical-scientific evidence available it is more probable than not that chronic pruritus ani and death from chronic pruritus ani can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(3) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 76 of 2010 concerning chronic pruritus ani.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 eligible war service (other than operational service) under the VEA;

 defence service (other than hazardous service) under the VEA;

 peacetime service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that, on the balance of probabilities, chronic pruritus ani or death from chronic pruritus ani is connected with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008 concerning pruritus ani in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • changing the name of the Instrument from 'pruritus ani' to 'chronic pruritus ani';
  • new definition of 'chronic pruritus ani' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(m) concerning 'adequate anal hygiene';
  • revising factors 6(b) & 6(n) concerning 'diarrhoea';
  • revising factors 6(c) & 6(o) concerning 'a rectal or anal condition';
  • revising factors 6(d) & 6(p) concerning 'a perianal or anal infection';
  • revising factors 6(e) & 6(q) concerning 'a local perianal or anal infestation';
  • revising factors 6(f) & 6(r) concerning 'a pathological vaginal discharge';
  • revising factors 6(g) & 6(s) concerning 'a dermatological disease';
  • revising factors 6(h) & 6(t) concerning 'therapeutic radiation';
  • revising factors 6(i) & 6(u) concerning 'corticosteroid related atrophy of the perianal skin';
  • revising factors 6(j) & 6(v) concerning 'being systemically treated with water-soluble corticosteroid phosphates';
  • revising factors 6(k) & 6(w) concerning 'being treated with nicosamide, clioquinol or mineral oil';
  • new factors 6(l) & 6(x) concerning 'a systemic disease';
  • new definitions of 'a rectal or anal condition from the specified list', 'a systemic disease from the specified list', 'adequate anal hygiene', 'an agent from the specified list of infections', 'an agent from the specified list of infestations', 'death from chronic pruritus ani' and 'terminal event' in clause 9;
  • revising definitions of 'a course of therapeutic radiation', 'a dermatological disease from the specified list', 'a pathological vaginal discharge', 'diarrhoea', and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definitions of 'anal hygiene', 'dermatological disease from the specified list', 'high potency topical corticosteroid-containing preparations', 'ICD code', 'malignant lesion of the anal or perianal region', 'perianal area', 'pruritus ani', 'specified list of colorectal or anal conditions', 'specified list of infections and infestations' and 'therapeutic radiation'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to pruritus ani in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to pruritus ani as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008.

 

10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 76 of 2010 was enacted under the authority granted by the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument addresses the gap in the provision of medical evidence concerning the potential link between chronic pruritus ani and specific types of military service. By replacing the previous Instrument No. 42 of 1996, the Authority aims to provide updated and comprehensive criteria for determining the eligibility of veterans for compensation related to chronic pruritus ani, ensuring that claims are assessed based on the most current medical-scientific evidence. The policy objective is to provide fair and timely compensation to veterans suffering from conditions that can be linked to their service, thereby upholding the commitment to support those who have served their country.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority, pursuant to the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA), has established Instrument No. 76 of 2010 concerning chronic pruritus ani, replacing the previously revoked Instrument No. 42 of 1996. This new instrument is designed to address the medical-scientific evidence that suggests a probable connection between chronic pruritus ani and specific types of military service. The determination of this Instrument applies to individuals who have served in eligible war service, defence service, or peacetime service, as defined by the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). Claims for compensation related to chronic pruritus ani, sustained or contracted on or after 1 July 2004, are adjudicated by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, referencing the Statements of Principles issued by the Authority. The Instrument specifies the conditions and factors that must exist for a claim to be considered in relation to the service rendered, thereby providing a framework for determining the connection between chronic pruritus ani and military service. The Authority conducted an investigation, inviting submissions from relevant organisations and experts, though no submissions were received. The finalisation of this Instrument concludes the investigation as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008.

Key Provisions

The key operative sections of this legislation, particularly sections 2 to 8, outline the revocation of Instrument No. 42 of 1996 concerning pruritus ani and the determination of a new Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 76 of 2010 concerning chronic pruritus ani under subsection 196B(3) of the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA). This new Instrument details the specific conditions under which chronic pruritus ani, or death from chronic pruritus ani, can be considered related to particular kinds of military service. The new Instrument supersedes the previously revoked one and is designed to reflect the most recent medical-scientific evidence available to the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority). It is important to note that the new Instrument adopts a revised format and contains updated definitions and factors relating to the condition. The obligations and requirements imposed by this Act are primarily on the Authority, which must determine Statements of Principles based on sound medical-scientific evidence. The Authority is tasked with evaluating the evidence concerning the connection between chronic pruritus ani and various types of military service, as specified in the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). Additionally, the Authority is responsible for notifying the public of its intention to investigate conditions such as pruritus ani, as seen in the notification published in the Government Notices Gazette of 25 June 2008. The Authority must also consider any submissions received from relevant organisations and individuals during the investigation process. Furthermore, the Authority is required to make a list of references relating to the condition available to specified persons or organisations upon request. In terms of offences, penalties, or consequences for breach, the legislation itself does not explicitly outline specific criminal or civil penalties for non-compliance with the requirements set out in the new Instrument. However, the determination of the Statement of Principles and the conditions it outlines will have significant implications for veterans and service personnel seeking compensation for service-related injuries or diseases. The new Instrument will be used by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission to assess claims for compensation under section 319 of the MRCA. Failure to adhere to the provisions of the new Instrument could potentially result in the denial of compensation claims for those who cannot demonstrate a connection between their condition and their service as outlined in the Statement of Principles. While the legislation does not specify maximum penalties for non-compliance, the impact on claimants seeking compensation could be substantial.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Licensing & Registration

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.