Statement of Principles concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 57 of 2023)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2023L00486 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKAEMIA

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (No. 57 of 2023)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 57 of 2023).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 47 of 2014 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2014L00479) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that chronic myeloid leukaemia and death from chronic myeloid leukaemia can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 57 of 2023).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting chronic myeloid leukaemia or death from chronic myeloid leukaemia, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 31 August 2021 concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'chronic myeloid leukaemia' in subsection 7(2);
  • including ICD-10-AM codes for 'chronic myeloid leukaemia' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • removing the factor concerning smoking;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning undergoing ablative treatment with radioactive iodine;
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning being obese;
  • new factor in subsection 9(4) concerning being exposed to benzene;
  • new factor in subsection 9(5) concerning having received a kidney transplant;
  • new definitions of 8-hour time-weighted average, being obese, being exposed to benzene as specified and ppm-years               in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • deleting the definition of pack-years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products in Schedule 1  Dictionary.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to chronic myeloid leukaemia in the Government Notices Gazette of 31 August 2021, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 22 December 2022, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of factor relating to: "smoking at least 15  pack-years of cigarettes, or the equivalent thereof in other tobacco products, before the clinical onset of chronic myeloid leukaemia, and where smoking has ceased, the clinical onset of chronic myeloid leukaemia has occurred within ten years of cessation".  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to chronic myeloid leukaemia as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 31 August 2021.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 57 of 2023

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Chronic myeloid leukaemia

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have chronic myeloid leukaemia;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting chronic myeloid leukaemia with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 47 of 2014; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 57 of 2023) was enacted in 2023 to address the problem of establishing a reasonable hypothesis connecting chronic myeloid leukaemia or death from chronic myeloid leukaemia with specific service circumstances. This legislation, introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), aims to outline the minimum factors that must exist for such a hypothesis to be considered reasonable, thereby facilitating claims under the VEA and MRCA. It was determined following an investigation into the available sound medical-scientific evidence, and this new instrument replaces the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 47 of 2014. The policy objective is to ensure that compensation and benefits are extended to eligible persons based on reasonable, proportionate, and transparent qualifying conditions, thereby promoting human rights such as the right to social security, adequate standard of living, and highest attainable standard of health.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning chronic myeloid leukaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 57 of 2023) applies to claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). It is applicable to veterans and current or former Defence Force members who have rendered specific types of service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, and British nuclear test defence service under the VEA, as well as warlike and non-warlike service under the MRCA. The principles are designed to determine whether a reasonable hypothesis exists that links chronic myeloid leukaemia or death from the condition to the service rendered by the claimant. The instrument's jurisdiction covers Commonwealth provisions and applies nationally, as it is determined under the authority of the Repatriation Medical Authority as specified in the VEA. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the instrument, but it does specify certain factors that must be present to connect chronic myeloid leukaemia with service, thereby potentially restricting the application to cases meeting these criteria. The instrument may be further refined or extended through subordinate instruments or regulations, though no such measures are indicated in the provided text.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statement of Principles concern chronic myeloid leukaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 57 of 2023) outline the circumstances under which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting chronic myeloid leukaemia or death from chronic myeloid leukaemia with particular kinds of service rendered by a person, as specified in sections 5 and 9. This involves setting out factors that must exist and be related to the service, such as operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). The factors include exposure to certain substances like benzene, undergoing ablative treatment with radioactive iodine, being obese, and having received a kidney transplant, among others. This Statement of Principles replaces the previous Instrument No. 47 of 2014 and incorporates the latest medical-scientific evidence available to the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority). The obligations imposed by the Act on the parties it governs include ensuring that claims under the VEA and MRCA are assessed based on the specified factors in the Statement of Principles. Claimants must demonstrate that the requisite factors exist and are related to their service, while the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission are required to evaluate these claims based on the criteria outlined in the Statement of Principles. The Authority is also obligated to periodically review and update the Statement of Principles to reflect new medical-scientific evidence, ensuring that the determination of claims remains accurate and relevant. The Statement of Principles does not explicitly outline specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach. However, it is implied that failure to adhere to the criteria set forth in the Statement of Principles could result in the denial of benefits or compensation to which a claimant might otherwise be entitled. While the Statement of Principles itself does not impose penalties, the underlying Acts (VEA and MRCA) contain provisions for the review and appeal of decisions related to claims. If a claimant believes their claim has been unjustly denied, they can seek review through the Veterans' Review Board or the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, as applicable. These reviews provide avenues for rectifying any errors or injustices in the initial claim assessment.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statement of Principles
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.