Statement of Principles concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 101 of 2021)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2021L01384 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

CHRONIC GASTRITIS AND CHRONIC GASTROPATHY

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 101 OF 2021)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 101 of 2021).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 25 of 2013 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2013L00720) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy and death from chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 101 of 2021).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy or death from chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 January 2021 concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definitions of 'chronic gastritis' and 'chronic gastropathy' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the factors in paragraphs 9(1)(a) and 9(9)(a) concerning having a Helicobacter pylori infection of the gastric mucosa, for chronic gastritis only;
  • revising the factors in paragraphs 9(1)(b) and 9(9)(b) concerning having Helicobacter heilmannii sensu lato infection of the gastric mucosa, for chronic gastritis only;
  • revising the factors in paragraphs 9(1)(c) and 9(9)(c) concerning having an infection of the gastric mucosa from the specified list of infections, for chronic gastritis only;
  • revising the factors in paragraphs 9(1)(d) and 9(9)(d) concerning being in an immunocompromised state as specified, for chronic gastritis only;
  • revising the factors in paragraphs 9(1)(e) and 9(9)(e) concerning taking an immune checkpoint inhibitor, for chronic gastritis only;
  • revising the factor in paragraph 9(2)(a) concerning having reflux of bile acids into the stomach, for clinical onset of chronic gastropathy only;
  • revising the factor in paragraph 9(2)(b) concerning taking a non-topical, non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drug, including aspirin, for clinical onset of chronic gastropathy only;
  • revising the factor in paragraph 9(2)(c) concerning taking a drug from the Specified List 1 of drugs, for clinical onset of chronic gastropathy only;
  • revising the factor in paragraph 9(2)(d) concerning consuming alcohol, for clinical onset of chronic gastropathy only;
  • revising the factor in paragraph 9(2)(e) concerning undergoing a course of therapeutic radiation for cancer, for clinical onset of chronic gastropathy only;
  • revising the factor in paragraph 9(2)(f) concerning having received yttrium-90 microspheres, for clinical onset of chronic gastropathy only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(3) concerning having reflux of bile acids into the stomach, for clinical worsening;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning taking a non-topical,
    non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drug, including aspirin, for clinical worsening;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(5) concerning taking a drug from the Specified List 2 of drugs, for clinical worsening;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning consuming alcohol, for clinical worsening;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning undergoing a course of therapeutic radiation for cancer, for clinical worsening;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning having received yttrium-90 microspheres, for clinical worsening;
  • deleting the factors concerning having received a cumulative equivalent dose of ionising radiation as these are covered by the factors in paragraph 9(2)(e) and subsection 9(7) concerning undergoing a course of therapeutic radiation for cancer;
  • new definitions of 'chronic renal failure', 'Helicobacter heilmannii sensu lato', 'immunosuppressive drug', 'MRCA', 'Specified List 1 of drugs', 'Specified List 2 of drugs', 'specified list of infections' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'immunocompromised state as specified' and 'relevant service'               in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from Specified List 1', 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from Specified List 2', 'a specified infection', 'alcohol' and 'cumulative equivalent dose'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 January 2021, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

Human Rights

9.             This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

10.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 5 January 2021.

References

11.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 101 of 2021

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 25 of 2013; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 101 of 2021) was introduced by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 to address the need for updated medical-scientific evidence linking chronic gastritis, chronic gastropathy, and certain types of military service. This legislation replaces the previous Instrument No. 25 of 2013, reflecting new evidence that supports a connection between these conditions and specific service circumstances. The primary objective is to ensure that veterans and current or former Defence Force members can claim appropriate medical treatment and compensation if they develop chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy due to their service, while also promoting transparency and fairness in the assessment of such claims. The Statement of Principles sets out the minimum factors that must be present and related to the service in question to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting the conditions with the service rendered. This approach aims to facilitate both the assessment of claims by relevant authorities and the review of decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 101 of 2021) applies to claims under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It sets out the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis that chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy, or death from these conditions, is related to specific types of service rendered by a person. These services include operational service, peacekeeping service, hazardous service, British nuclear test defence service, warlike service, and non-warlike service. The principles are designed to facilitate both the making of claims and the assessment of those claims by the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, respectively. The scope of the Act is national, applying across Australia. The Act does not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, but it may be subject to extensions or restrictions through subordinate instruments. This legislative instrument promotes various human rights, including the right to social security, an adequate standard of living, and the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, ensuring these rights are exercised without discrimination.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning chronic gastritis and chronic gastropathy (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 101 of 2021) (the Statement) outlines the factors that must exist for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised that chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy, or death from these conditions, is related to particular kinds of service. The Statement is determined under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) and replaces the previous Instrument No. 25 of 2013. It specifies the circumstances under which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy, and it facilitates the assessment and review of such claims. The factors set out in the Statement are based on the latest sound medical-scientific evidence. The Statement imposes several obligations on parties involved in the assessment and determination of claims under the VEA and MRCA. Claimants must provide evidence that they suffer from chronic gastritis or chronic gastropathy, and that the condition is related to specific kinds of service as outlined in the Statement. The Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission must assess claims based on the factors set out in the Statement, ensuring that decisions are made on the basis of the available sound medical-scientific evidence. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal must review decisions in accordance with the Statement, ensuring that the process is fair and transparent. Failure to comply with the requirements of the Statement may have legal consequences for the parties involved. The VEA and MRCA provide for various offences, penalties, and civil or criminal consequences for breach. For instance, providing false or misleading information to obtain benefits under the VEA or MRCA may result in criminal charges and penalties. Similarly, obstructing or interfering with the assessment or review process may also result in criminal charges and penalties. The maximum penalties for such offences are determined by the respective Acts and may include fines and imprisonment. It is essential that all parties involved in the assessment and determination of claims under the VEA and MRCA adhere to the requirements of the Statement and comply with the relevant legislation to avoid any legal consequences.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Implications
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.