Statement of Principles concerning chondromalacia patella No. 79 of 2010

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2010L02318 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

REPATRIATION MEDICAL AUTHORITY

 

INSTRUMENT NO. 79 of 2010

 

VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

EXPLANATORY NOTES FOR TABLING

 

 

  1. The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), revokes Instrument No. 33 of 2001, determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning chondromalacia patellae.

 

2.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that chondromalacia patella and death from chondromalacia patella can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles, Instrument No. 79 of 2010 concerning chondromalacia patella.  This Instrument will in effect replace the revoked Statement of Principles.

 

3.             The provisions of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA) relating to claims for compensation commenced on 1 July 2004.  Claims under section 319 of the MRCA for acceptance of liability for a service injury sustained, a service disease contracted or service death on or after 1 July 2004 are determined by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission by reference to Statements of Principles issued by the Authority pursuant to the VEA.

 

4.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

 

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting chondromalacia patella or death from chondromalacia patella, with the circumstances of that service.

 

5.             This new Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 April 2009 concerning chondromalacia patellae in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

 

6.             The contents of the new Instrument are in similar terms as the revoked Instrument.  Comparing the new and the revoked Instruments, the differences include:

 

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2005;
  • deleting the ICD code from the Instrument header;
  • changing the name of the Instrument from 'chondromalacia patellae' to 'chondromalacia patella';
  • new definition of 'chondromalacia patella' in clause 3;
  • revising factors 6(a) & 6(h) concerning 'direct trauma to the patella';
  • revising factor 6(c) & 6(j) concerning 'an injury to the affected knee';
  • revising factor 6(d) & 6(k) concerning 'acquired abnormal tracking of the patella';
  • revising factor 6(e) concerning 'running or jogging';
  • new factors 6(b) & 6(i) concerning 'patellar dislocation';
  • new factors 6(f) & 6(m) concerning 'undertaking weight bearing exercise';
  • new factors 6(g) & 6(n) concerning 'increasing the frequency, duration, or intensity of weight bearing activity';
  • new factor 6(l) concerning 'running or jogging' and clinical worsening;
  • new definition of 'MET';
  • revising definitions of 'abnormal tracking of the patella', 'death from chondromalacia patella', 'direct trauma to the patella', 'ICD-10-AM code' and 'relevant service' in clause 9;
  • deleting definition of 'chondromalacia patellae'; and
  • specifying a date of effect for the Instrument in clause 11.

 

7.             Further changes to the format of the Instrument reflect the commencement of the MRCA and clarify that pursuant to subsection 196B(3A) of the VEA, the Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

 

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to chondromalacia patellae in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 April 2009, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  One submission was received for consideration by the Authority during the investigation.

 

9.             The determining of this new Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to chondromalacia patellae as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 April 2009.

 


10.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available to any person or organisation referred to in subsection 196E(1)(a) to (c) of the VEA.  Any such request must be made in writing to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

 

The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority Secretariat

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

Overview

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 79 of 2010, which amends the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, was enacted to address the issue of chondromalacia patella, a condition that can be related to certain types of military service. This instrument was issued by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. The policy objective of this instrument is to provide a new Statement of Principles concerning chondromalacia patella, replacing the previously revoked Instrument No. 33 of 2001. The Authority's determination is based on sound medical-scientific evidence that connects the condition with specific military service circumstances. The instrument outlines the minimum factors that must be present to establish a link between chondromalacia patella, death from chondromalacia patella, and particular military service rendered, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service. This legislative amendment ensures that claims for compensation concerning chondromalacia patella, sustained on or after 1 July 2004, are assessed according to the new Statement of Principles.

Scope and Application

The Repatriation Medical Authority Instrument No. 79 of 2010, under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA), addresses the conditions under which chondromalacia patella and death from chondromalacia patella can be related to military service. This Act applies to individuals who have served in various capacities including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, warlike, and non-warlike service, and who may have sustained or developed chondromalacia patella as a result of their service. The scope of the Act is national, applying across Australia as it is enacted under Commonwealth legislation. The new Instrument replaces the previously revoked Instrument No. 33 of 2001 and includes revised definitions and factors that must be considered in determining liability for compensation claims. The Instrument is designed to ensure that claims for compensation are assessed based on the latest medical-scientific evidence and updated legislative framework. The Authority has the power to extend or restrict the application of this Instrument through subordinate instruments, ensuring it remains relevant and effective in addressing the needs of affected veterans.

Key Provisions

The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority) under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) has revoked Instrument No. 33 of 2001 and replaced it with Instrument No. 79 of 2010 concerning chondromalacia patellae. This new instrument reflects the Authority's view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence linking chondromalacia patella and death from chondromalacia patella to particular types of service. Instrument No. 79 outlines a Statement of Principles that specifies the minimum factors that must exist and be related to the types of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, and warlike service, to establish a connection between chondromalacia patella or death from it and the service circumstances. The obligations imposed by this Act require the Authority to establish Statements of Principles based on available sound medical-scientific evidence. It mandates that these statements be applied by the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission when determining claims for compensation under section 319 of the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA). The Authority must advertise its intention to investigate and determine such Statements of Principles, inviting submissions from relevant stakeholders and experts. The Authority must also ensure that the new instrument aligns with the latest revised Instrument format and clarifies its application under both the VEA and the MRCA. Failure to comply with the provisions of this Act may result in legal consequences. Under the VEA, any person aggrieved by a decision of the Authority may seek review by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal. Additionally, any individual or entity that does not adhere to the requirements of the Statement of Principles when assessing claims for compensation may face challenges in the tribunal. The penalties for non-compliance or failure to follow the correct procedures are primarily administrative and may involve the correction of claims or the reassessment of applications. The maximum penalties for breaches of this Act, if applicable, are not explicitly stated in the explanatory notes. However, the primary consequences revolve around the administrative review process, ensuring that claims are assessed according to the correct and updated medical-scientific evidence provided by the Authority. The focus is on rectifying any errors or omissions in the application of the Statement of Principles rather than imposing financial penalties.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Medical Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Licensing & Registration
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.