Statement of Principles concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 88 of 2023)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2023L01164 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

CHARCOT-MARIE-TOOTH DISEASE

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (No. 88 of 2023)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 88 of 2023).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 21 of 2015 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2014L01827) determined under subsection 196B(2) of the VEA concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and death from Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 88 of 2023).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or death from Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022 concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(1) concerning taking a drug that cannot be ceased or substituted;
  • new definitions of 'MRCA' and VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary; and
  • deleting the definition of 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from the specified list'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 23 May 2023, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised replacing the 'being treated with a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from the specified list' factor with a generic drug factor.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  No changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 10 May 2022.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority's website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

Email:    info@rma.gov.au

Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001

 


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 88 of 2023

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 21 of 2015; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICESCR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICESCR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 88 of 2023) was enacted in 2023 by the Repatriation Medical Authority under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA). This legislative instrument addresses the need for a clear, medically-grounded framework to assess claims related to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease among veterans and Defence Force members. The policy objective is to ensure that claimants can more easily access the benefits and compensation they are entitled to by providing a detailed and evidence-based connection between the disease and specific kinds of service. This instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles from 2015, updating it to reflect the latest medical-scientific evidence and clarifying the criteria necessary to establish a reasonable hypothesis of service-related Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. The document is designed to facilitate both the assessment of claims and the review of decisions, ensuring that the rights of veterans and their dependents are upheld with transparency and fairness.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 88 of 2023) applies to veterans and members of the Defence Force under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004. It outlines the circumstances in which Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or death from the disease can be reasonably hypothesised to be connected with particular kinds of service, such as operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence service, warlike, or non-warlike service. This document serves to facilitate claims and assessments made by eligible persons and their representatives, and to outline the minimum factors required to establish a reasonable hypothesis of connection between the disease and the service rendered. The Instrument is applicable nationally and replaces the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 21 of 2015, reflecting updated medical-scientific evidence. The Authority has determined this Instrument solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence and it does not derogate from any human rights but rather promotes various human rights for veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents, including the right to social security and health. The Instrument's application may be further extended or restricted through subordinate instruments.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 88 of 2023) under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) outlines the circumstances under which a reasonable hypothesis can be raised connecting Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease or death from it with particular kinds of military service. The main sections of this instrument (subsections 5, 7, 9, and 11) detail the specific factors and service types that must be considered to establish such a connection. These sections require that certain medical and service-related conditions must exist and be linked to the service in question. The obligations imposed by this Act primarily concern the Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), which must determine the sound medical-scientific evidence and establish the Statement of Principles. The Authority is responsible for ensuring that the instrument facilitates both claimants and the relevant Commissions (Repatriation Commission and Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission) in assessing and reviewing claims. The Authority must also ensure that the instrument does not derogate from any human rights and promotes the rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members, and their dependents. In terms of penalties and consequences, the legislation does not explicitly detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breaches. However, the determination of this instrument is crucial for the proper administration of veterans' entitlements and compensation claims. Failure to comply with the requirements of this instrument could lead to improper assessments of claims, potentially resulting in veterans or their dependents not receiving the benefits to which they are entitled. Such failures could also lead to administrative or judicial review, where the courts may provide remedies or order corrective actions to ensure compliance with the Act.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Human Rights Law
Instrument
Act
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Human Rights Implications
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.