Statement of Principles concerning aplastic anaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 58 of 2020)

Administered by Department of Veterans' Affairs

Legislation au F2020L01085 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING

APLASTIC ANAEMIA

(REASONABLE HYPOTHESIS) (NO. 58 OF 2020)

 

VETERANS' ENTITLEMENTS ACT 1986

MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION ACT 2004

 

  1. This is the Explanatory Statement to the Statement of Principles concerning aplastic anaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 58 of 2020).

Background

2.             The Repatriation Medical Authority (the Authority), under subsection 196B(8) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA), repeals Instrument No. 50 of 2012 (Federal Register of Legislation No. F2012L01791) determined under subsections 196B(2) and (8) of the VEA concerning aplastic anaemia.

3.             The Authority is of the view that there is sound medical-scientific evidence that indicates that aplastic anaemia and death from aplastic anaemia can be related to particular kinds of service.  The Authority has therefore determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the VEA a Statement of Principles concerning aplastic anaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 58 of 2020).  This Instrument will in effect replace the repealed Statement of Principles.

Purpose and Operation

4.             The Statement of Principles will be applied in determining claims under the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).

5.             The Statement of Principles sets out the factors that must as a minimum exist, and which of those factors must be related to the following kinds of service rendered by a person:

 operational service under the VEA;

 peacekeeping service under the VEA;

 hazardous service under the VEA;

 British nuclear test defence service under the VEA;

 warlike service under the MRCA;

 non-warlike service under the MRCA,

before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised connecting aplastic anaemia or death from aplastic anaemia, with the circumstances of that service.  The Statement of Principles has been determined for the purposes of both the VEA and the MRCA.

6.             This Instrument results from an investigation notified by the Authority in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 October 2019 concerning aplastic anaemia in accordance with section 196G of the VEA.  The investigation involved an examination of the sound medical-scientific evidence now available to the Authority, including the sound medical-scientific evidence it has previously considered.

7.             The contents of this Instrument are in similar terms as the repealed Instrument.  Comparing this Instrument and the repealed Instrument, the differences include:

  • adopting the latest revised Instrument format, which commenced in 2015;
  • specifying a day of commencement for the Instrument in section 2;
  • revising the definition of 'aplastic anaemia' in subsection 7(2);
  • revising ICD-10-AM codes for 'aplastic anaemia' in subsection 7(3);
  • revising the reference to 'ICD-10-AM code' in subsection 7(4);
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(2) concerning being treated with a drug specified in the Schedule 2 - Drugs, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(3) concerning being treated with a drug, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(4) concerning being treated with a non-aspirin, nonsteroidal, anti-inflammatory drug, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(6) concerning being exposed to benzene, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(7) concerning inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a herbicide or insecticide, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(8) concerning acute hepatitis, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(10) concerning autoimmune diseases, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(11) concerning haematological malignancies, for clinical onset only;
  • revising the factor in subsection 9(12) concerning thymoma or thymic carcinoma, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(13) concerning infection with parvovirus B19 or acute infectious mononucleosis, for clinical onset only;
  • new factor in subsection 9(14) concerning being pregnant, for clinical worsening;
  • deleting the factor concerning inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a pesticide, as this is now covered by the factor in subsection 9(7) concerning inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with a herbicide or insecticide;
  • deleting the factor concerning undergoing a course of therapeutic radiation for ankylosing spondylitis;
  • new definitions of 'MRCA', 'specified list of haematological malignancies', 'specified list of herbicides and insecticides' and 'VEA' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • revising the definitions of 'being exposed to benzene as specified', 'relevant service' by the inclusion of a note and 'specified list of autoimmune diseases' in Schedule 1 - Dictionary;
  • new table of specified drugs in Schedule 2 - Drugs; and
  • deleting the definitions of 'a drug or a drug from a class of drugs from the specified list', 'a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug from the specified list', 'inhaling, ingesting or having cutaneous contact with' and 'specified list of pesticides'.

Consultation

8.             Prior to determining this Instrument, the Authority advertised its intention to undertake an investigation in relation to aplastic anaemia in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 October 2019, and circulated a copy of the notice of intention to investigate to a wide range of organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants.  The Authority invited submissions from the Repatriation Commission, the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission, organisations and persons referred to in section 196E of the VEA, and any person having expertise in the field.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority in relation to the investigation.

9.             On 16 April 2020, the Authority wrote to organisations representing veterans, service personnel and their dependants regarding the proposed Instrument and the medical-scientific material considered by the Authority.  This letter emphasised the deletion of the factor relating to undergoing a course of therapeutic radiation for ankylosing spondylitis within the six months before the clinical onset of aplastic anaemia.  The Authority provided an opportunity to the organisations to make representations in relation to the proposed Instrument prior to its determination.  No submissions were received for consideration by the Authority.  Non-substantial changes were made to the proposed Instrument following this consultation process.

Human Rights

10.         This instrument is compatible with the Human Rights and Freedoms recognised or declared in the International Instruments listed in Section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.  A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights follows.

Finalisation of Investigation

11.         The determining of this Instrument finalises the investigation in relation to aplastic anaemia as advertised in the Government Notices Gazette of 29 October 2019.

References

12.         A list of references relating to the above condition is available on the Authority’s website at: www.rma.gov.au. Any other document referred to in this Statement of Principles is available on request to the Repatriation Medical Authority at the following address:

              

  Email:    info@rma.gov.au

  Post:      The Registrar

Repatriation Medical Authority

GPO Box 1014

BRISBANE    QLD    4001


Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

(Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011)

 

Instrument No.:   Statement of Principles No. 58 of 2020

Kind of Injury, Disease or Death: Aplastic anaemia

 

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

1. This Legislative Instrument is determined pursuant to subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (the VEA) for the purposes of the VEA and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (the MRCA).  Part XIA of the VEA requires the determination of these instruments outlining the factors connecting particular kinds of injury, disease or death with service such being determined solely on the available sound medical-scientific evidence.

2. This Legislative Instrument:-

  • facilitates claimants in making, and the Repatriation Commission in assessing, claims under the VEA and the MRCA respectively, by specifying the circumstances in which medical treatment and compensation can be extended to eligible persons who have aplastic anaemia;
  • facilitates the review of such decisions by the Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal;
  • outlines the factors which the current sound medical-scientific evidence indicates must as a minimum exist, before it can be said that a reasonable hypothesis has been raised, connecting aplastic anaemia with the circumstances of eligible service rendered by a person, as set out in clause 5 of the Explanatory Statement;
  • replaces Instrument No. 50 of 2012; and
  • reflects developments in the available sound medical-scientific evidence concerning aplastic anaemia which have occurred since that earlier instrument was determined. 

3. The Instrument is assessed as being a technical instrument which improves the medico-scientific quality of outcomes under the VEA and the MRCA. 

Human Rights Implications

4. This Legislative Instrument does not derogate from any human rights. It promotes the human rights of veterans, current and former Defence Force members as well as other persons such as their dependents, including:

  • the right to social security (Art 9, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights; Art 26, Convention on the Rights of the Child and Art 28, Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) by helping to ensure that the qualifying conditions for the benefit are 'reasonable, proportionate and transparent'[1];
  • the right to an adequate standard of living (Art 11, ICSECR; Art 27, CRC and Art 28, CRPD) by facilitating the assessment and determination of social security benefits;
  • the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health (Art 12, ICSECR and Art 25, CRPD), by facilitating the assessment and determination of compensation and benefits in relation to the treatment and rehabilitation of veterans and Defence Force members;
  • the rights of persons with disabilities by facilitating the determination of claims relating to treatment and rehabilitation (Art 26, CRPD); and
  • ensuring that those rights "will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status" (Art 2, ICESCR).

Conclusion

This Legislative Instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not derogate from and promotes a number of human rights.

 

Repatriation Medical Authority

 

 

 

 

 

 

[1] In General Comment No. 19 (The right to social security), the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights said (at paragraph 24) this to be one of the elements of ensuring accessibility to social security.

Overview

The Statement of Principles concerning aplastic anaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 58 of 2020) is an instrument determined by the Repatriation Medical Authority under subsection 196B(2) of the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986. This instrument replaces the previously repealed Statement of Principles No. 50 of 2012 and outlines the factors that must exist, which must be related to certain kinds of service, for a reasonable hypothesis to be raised connecting aplastic anaemia or death from aplastic anaemia with the circumstances of that service. It serves to facilitate the assessment and determination of claims for medical treatment and compensation under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, reflecting the latest sound medical-scientific evidence. The instrument was determined following an investigation into aplastic anaemia, advertised in the Government Notices Gazette on 29 October 2019, with no submissions received for consideration. The instrument is compatible with human rights, promoting various rights such as the right to social security, adequate standard of living, and highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, without derogating from any human rights.

Scope and Application

The Statement of Principles concerning aplastic anaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 58 of 2020) applies to individuals who have served in the Australian Defence Force and have developed aplastic anaemia, or who died from aplastic anaemia, potentially as a result of their service. The Act operates under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004, thereby extending its application to both current and former Defence Force members. The principles are designed to facilitate the process of making and assessing claims for medical treatment and compensation for those affected by aplastic anaemia. The scope of this legislation is national, as it pertains to the Commonwealth of Australia and its statutory bodies, the Repatriation Medical Authority and the Repatriation Commission. The Act does not explicitly state any exclusions or exemptions, but it is understood that its application is contingent on the presence of specific medical-scientific evidence linking the service to the condition. The application of the Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, which can provide further clarifications or modifications as necessary.

Key Provisions

The Statement of Principles concerning aplastic anaemia (Reasonable Hypothesis) (No. 58 of 2020) outlines the minimum factors that must exist to establish a reasonable hypothesis connecting aplastic anaemia with specific types of military service, including operational, peacekeeping, hazardous, British nuclear test defence, warlike, and non-warlike service (sections 5 and 6). This instrument replaces the previous Statement of Principles No. 50 of 2012, incorporating updated medical-scientific evidence and a revised format (sections 2, 6, and 7). The factors related to exposure to certain drugs, chemicals, and conditions have been updated, and some factors have been deleted or modified to reflect the latest evidence (subsections 9(2) to 9(14)). Additionally, new definitions and lists have been introduced, and others have been removed or revised (Schedule 1 - Dictionary, and Schedule 2 - Drugs). The Statement of Principles imposes specific obligations on parties involved in claims related to aplastic anaemia. Claimants must provide evidence that the minimum factors outlined in the Statement of Principles are met, and the Repatriation Commission is required to assess these claims based on the criteria specified in the document. The Veterans' Review Board and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal are also bound by these provisions when reviewing decisions made under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VEA) and the Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2004 (MRCA) (section 2). The Repatriation Medical Authority must consider the latest sound medical-scientific evidence when determining these statements of principles (subsection 196B(2) of the VEA). The Statement of Principles does not create any new offences or penalties; rather, it serves as a guideline for assessing claims and determining eligibility for benefits and compensation related to aplastic anaemia. However, any failure to comply with the requirements outlined in the Statement of Principles could result in the denial of a claim or the revocation of benefits already granted. Additionally, the Repatriation Medical Authority may face legal challenges if it is determined that the Statement of Principles is not based on sound medical-scientific evidence or does not adequately protect the human rights of claimants (subsection 196B(8) of the VEA).

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Veterans' Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.